The social content CREATING these monsters is well known. The USA is NOT protecting their children.
Violent nihilism or any other form of promoted violence is illegal, especially with young people under 18 years old.
I thought electronic signatures were absolute proof of the device sending a message. Why is it websites like this exist? It is not freedom of speech when sexual exploitation and promoted violence is the content. This is not legal commerce. The internet of any kind is commerce as people pay a user fee. These violent perpetrators can be identified with their electronic signatures and should be immediately prosecuted and prohibited from ever using electronic media again. A judge can sentence the prohibition of internet access when a crime has been committed. With such a sentence perpetrators can be immediately arrested when they return to continued use of the internet.
These interventions to protect the children of the USA from death should be the easiest measure any law enforcement agent can carry out leading to prosecution. My understanding of an electronic signature is that it is rock solid. So, what is the problem?
