I am not joking. My understanding of the origins of the trek to the USA started by these parents were in countries engulfed in drug cartel wars. The ACLU has a very difficult task ahead in locating grieving parents that should’ve been given asylum.
I admire the mission of the ACLU, but, they are going to need the resources of such agencies as the FBI, diplomatic missions and armed forces within these countries to locate and return grieving parents if they are still alive. The parents heartlessly deported without your children are not going to be in the local phone directory.
If I may, enlist the help of people with knowledge of these countries. ALSO, there may have been contact with the grieving parents and their government when they were returned in the deportation process. In that could be some kind of paper trail as to where to find them. But, even with the deportation paper trail it may be an issue of reaching them to return the children.
I never meant this more, but, someone like Mr. Strzok would have a leg up to know how such a mission would work. This is very dangerous stuff and quite frankly it is going to require government infrastructure to help.
No one more than I want parents and child reunited, but, realistically there are going to be parentless children after all is said and done. It is the obligation of the USA government to reunit these families, but, the actual logistics is difficult with deported parents. I suspect some of the parents are already on a trek back to our southern border as well. That would be a scenario that has to be entertained by the US Border Patrol and ICE, too. The ACLU might want to require the southern border patrols and agencies respect any returning parent seeking their children.
By all means I hope their litigation is successful, but, they need to demand funding and access to US government infrastructure that can actually carry out the search. I wish the ACLU well, at least one American organization cares.
Thursday, July 12, 2018
Ms. Stephanie A. Gregory Clifford is innocent.
Ms. Clifford is innocent and charges are dropped.
I TOLD YOU SO.
I guess Giuliani didn’t want the risk of be discovered for the ruthless SOB that he is.
I hope Ms. Clifford will someday return to Ohio. Perhaps, Cleveland, Toledo or Dayton. One bad experience should not frighten her so deeply it adversely effects her career.
I TOLD YOU SO.
I guess Giuliani didn’t want the risk of be discovered for the ruthless SOB that he is.
I hope Ms. Clifford will someday return to Ohio. Perhaps, Cleveland, Toledo or Dayton. One bad experience should not frighten her so deeply it adversely effects her career.
The US House is out of line in implicating the FBI and Deputy Attorney General in fault of answering questions
The US House has inappropriately demanded answers to questions in an unsecured venue, putting national intelligence in jeopardy for the sake of their politics.
The FBI and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein are completely blameless for Congresses obvious inability to carry out any business of the people today.
The majority leadership in the US House should be held negligent of the public trust for the hearing today and face ethic investigations.
The FBI and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein are completely blameless for Congresses obvious inability to carry out any business of the people today.
The majority leadership in the US House should be held negligent of the public trust for the hearing today and face ethic investigations.
Do Not Vote For Those that voted for Brian Benczkowski
Republicans up for election this year that placed Mr. Benczkowski within the US DOJ:
Cindy Hyde-Smith - Mississippi
Dean Heller - Nevada
Ted Cruz - Texas
Roger Wicker - Mississippi
Deb Fischer - Nebraska
John Barraso - Wyoming
Cindy Hyde-Smith - Mississippi
Dean Heller - Nevada
Ted Cruz - Texas
Roger Wicker - Mississippi
Deb Fischer - Nebraska
John Barraso - Wyoming
Committee continued
Rep. Cedric Richmond wants a return to meaningful work by the US House of Representatives- He returned time back to leadership.
Rep. Dennis Ross stated Mr. Strzok believes his statements are free speech. I agree. Rep. Ross believes the ownership of the phone negates the freedom of speech. He doesn’t believe there is no remorse by Mr. Strzok. Mr. Strzok stayed many, many times he regrets the episode. Sounds like remorse to me.
Rep. Ted Leu states the hearing is unnecessary and reminds there is no evidence of Mr. Strzok acted on his personal beliefs to derail the 2016 elections. He goes on to point out Republicans have made donations to political parties and yet there is no loss of trust of these Republicans on that basis.
Mr. Mark Walker states Mr. Strzok was not doing his job because he was texting too much and to Lisa Page. He cited one of Mr. Strzok’s statement as a plan of action. I sincerely believe A STATEMENT is not a plan,
Rep. Jamie Raskin recognizes there are better ways to spend committee’s time and there are other comments made about Democratic candidates as well. Mr. Strzok states he recruited not one Republican who have made negative comments about Donald Trump onto a deep state conspiracy.
I really think Americans need to take their country seriously in elections and end corrupt in government. That is what this committee hearing is, corruption to change the national dialogue about the truth. There is no real purpose served today by taxpayer monies. Everything going on today are duplicates of other government work that have already found no wrong doing. Former Director is above reproach especially since he removed Mr. Strzok from the investigation. I am pleased all citizens that participate in politics, including FBI agents, can enjoy the role they played when able to attend inauguration parties that even the President - Elect does not necessarily get to for the numerous parties occurring. I would expect some FBI leadership, which Mr. Strzok was, to even be invited to the head table if invited. Americans are suppose to participate in politics and enjoy celebrations of the victories.
end for now - even I have my limits to insults of my country
Rep. Dennis Ross stated Mr. Strzok believes his statements are free speech. I agree. Rep. Ross believes the ownership of the phone negates the freedom of speech. He doesn’t believe there is no remorse by Mr. Strzok. Mr. Strzok stayed many, many times he regrets the episode. Sounds like remorse to me.
Rep. Ted Leu states the hearing is unnecessary and reminds there is no evidence of Mr. Strzok acted on his personal beliefs to derail the 2016 elections. He goes on to point out Republicans have made donations to political parties and yet there is no loss of trust of these Republicans on that basis.
Mr. Mark Walker states Mr. Strzok was not doing his job because he was texting too much and to Lisa Page. He cited one of Mr. Strzok’s statement as a plan of action. I sincerely believe A STATEMENT is not a plan,
Rep. Jamie Raskin recognizes there are better ways to spend committee’s time and there are other comments made about Democratic candidates as well. Mr. Strzok states he recruited not one Republican who have made negative comments about Donald Trump onto a deep state conspiracy.
I really think Americans need to take their country seriously in elections and end corrupt in government. That is what this committee hearing is, corruption to change the national dialogue about the truth. There is no real purpose served today by taxpayer monies. Everything going on today are duplicates of other government work that have already found no wrong doing. Former Director is above reproach especially since he removed Mr. Strzok from the investigation. I am pleased all citizens that participate in politics, including FBI agents, can enjoy the role they played when able to attend inauguration parties that even the President - Elect does not necessarily get to for the numerous parties occurring. I would expect some FBI leadership, which Mr. Strzok was, to even be invited to the head table if invited. Americans are suppose to participate in politics and enjoy celebrations of the victories.
end for now - even I have my limits to insults of my country
The chairman of the hearing is making up rules s he sees it.
U.S. House Representative Louis Gomert of the First District of Texas is unable to carry out any questioning during a Congressional hearing because he has no civil demeanor. He admits he did not ask a question. Gomert did nothing but defame a former FBI agent and Hillary Clinton. Gomert should be examined to his participation at this hearing for ethics violations.
This hearing is turning into empty accusation after empty accusation for the sake of Republican politician agenda. The committee isn’t interested in answers of a former agent under oath. There you go, a committee member states he does not believe Mr. Strzok even when under oath. It is a circus and not a hearing. It is nothing but a PR stunt. I am not hearing anything of quality or sanity. Strzok is under oath and members of the committee are annoyed when the truth is said.
The Republicans are trying desperately to change the truth. Strzok should sue for the harassment he is receiving today. Hillary Clinton should sue for defamation.
This committee meaning should have never occurred in the first place because there’s an ongoing investigation. This hearing would have been far more effective if it was conducted after the conclusion of the investigation.
The unprofessional demeanor of the committee along with the unprofessional behavior of President Trump in Europe is giving our allies disillusionment of this country. I also find the coordination of this illegitimate committee and Donald Trump’s unnecessary meeting with Vladimir Putin very, very odd.
I have to agree with US House Representative Luis Gutierrez that unprofessional committee hearings designed to defame the FBI is the best propaganda for Russia.
US Rep. Brenda Lawrence stated the testimony of Mr. Strzok was focused on the lack of appropriate setting to today’s committee meeting in an unclassified setting. In other words the hearing today caused suspicion to Mr. Strzok in the inappropriate setting and his necessity to refuse to answer questions.
The more I see this committee meeting the more it appears to be a public show for political purposes.
U.S. Rep. Gowdy also disbelieves Mr. Strzok answers. It is easy to state Mr. Gowdy formulated answers to his questions he expected and when not provided by Mr. Strzok, Mr. Gowdy raises doubts in Mr. Strzok’s honesty.
I also believe US Rep. Jefferies is correct, the values of the Republican Party are in question not the democracy of the USA.
Gowdy is doing it again. He is looking for an answer that isn’t there. Rep. Gowdy can’t even maintain regular order.
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman is attempting to bring the purpose of the hearing back to have truth answers from Mr. Strzok. His 2+ minute response was an impassioned plea to return to healthy skepticism of Russia and it’s manipulations of the 2016 elections.
Polygraph “Out of Scope” questions by Rep. Doug Collins. It was determined Mr. Strzok was out of scope in January of 2016.
Rep. David Cicline is correct, this committee meeting is about developing a dialogue. That is why Rep. Collins asked a factual question to provide his participation as a valid investigation by the committee.
I will say this much about Rep. Gowdy, he was using his power as Chairman to cross examine Mr. Strzok rather than maintain order according to committee rules.
Rep. De Santis explores the bias of Mr. Strzok and has brought a conclusion that bias effected Mr. Strzok work. Mr. Strzok states he is unaware by others regarding his bias. Rep. De Santis states he is confident there is still an investigation of Mr. Strzok’s bias.
Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi brought focus of leaks and their detrimental effect on investgations. The more people aware of a fact the more likely it leaks. Concern there was visceral hatred of Hillary Clinton in the New York City field office and st that time Mr. Giuliani was in touch with active FBI before Mr. Comey announced the issue of the Weiner laptop. That is very interesting. I knew Comey was motivated by somebody regarding Hollary. Guilliani threw the election to Trump after the Russians did their dampest. The entire Comey thing was out of place and proved to be unnecessary after the damage was done to Hillary’s reputation.
Jordan’s questions could not be answered because of the inappropriate venue for the questions. What is Jordan doing there? He is refusing his responsibility in the sexual abuse of wrestlers under his supervision.
Mr. Strzok statements about Trump never being President was a personal statement taken out of context.
This week is a very sad week in the history of the United States for this travesty of a committee meeting and Trump riding roughshod over NATO and then to realize Guilliani accepted Russian influence in the 2016 election and then stirred up enough fear of reprisal against Comey and the FBI for not announcing the Weiner emails is more insult to the country’s integrity. It goes to prove the Republican Party will accept all forms of power to win an election to deliver on promises to cronies like the Kochs. The political machine of the GOP will do anything including placing an unqualified lawyer in the Justice Department to attempt to dismantle an investigation regarding Russian interference. This is Guilliani. I would what he is being paid to overthrow the government of the USA?
The Koch money helped along with Russia, but, it didn’t solely win the seats in 2016.
There needs to be veto proof legislation to protect Mueller from the Russian traitor currently in the Justice Department. There also needs to be funding established to carry out the reunification of immigrate families and a dedicated unit within HHS to conduct background checks of parents waiting for their children. Both these issues need to be addressed now.
This hearing is turning into empty accusation after empty accusation for the sake of Republican politician agenda. The committee isn’t interested in answers of a former agent under oath. There you go, a committee member states he does not believe Mr. Strzok even when under oath. It is a circus and not a hearing. It is nothing but a PR stunt. I am not hearing anything of quality or sanity. Strzok is under oath and members of the committee are annoyed when the truth is said.
The Republicans are trying desperately to change the truth. Strzok should sue for the harassment he is receiving today. Hillary Clinton should sue for defamation.
This committee meaning should have never occurred in the first place because there’s an ongoing investigation. This hearing would have been far more effective if it was conducted after the conclusion of the investigation.
The unprofessional demeanor of the committee along with the unprofessional behavior of President Trump in Europe is giving our allies disillusionment of this country. I also find the coordination of this illegitimate committee and Donald Trump’s unnecessary meeting with Vladimir Putin very, very odd.
I have to agree with US House Representative Luis Gutierrez that unprofessional committee hearings designed to defame the FBI is the best propaganda for Russia.
US Rep. Brenda Lawrence stated the testimony of Mr. Strzok was focused on the lack of appropriate setting to today’s committee meeting in an unclassified setting. In other words the hearing today caused suspicion to Mr. Strzok in the inappropriate setting and his necessity to refuse to answer questions.
The more I see this committee meeting the more it appears to be a public show for political purposes.
U.S. Rep. Gowdy also disbelieves Mr. Strzok answers. It is easy to state Mr. Gowdy formulated answers to his questions he expected and when not provided by Mr. Strzok, Mr. Gowdy raises doubts in Mr. Strzok’s honesty.
I also believe US Rep. Jefferies is correct, the values of the Republican Party are in question not the democracy of the USA.
Gowdy is doing it again. He is looking for an answer that isn’t there. Rep. Gowdy can’t even maintain regular order.
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman is attempting to bring the purpose of the hearing back to have truth answers from Mr. Strzok. His 2+ minute response was an impassioned plea to return to healthy skepticism of Russia and it’s manipulations of the 2016 elections.
Polygraph “Out of Scope” questions by Rep. Doug Collins. It was determined Mr. Strzok was out of scope in January of 2016.
Rep. David Cicline is correct, this committee meeting is about developing a dialogue. That is why Rep. Collins asked a factual question to provide his participation as a valid investigation by the committee.
I will say this much about Rep. Gowdy, he was using his power as Chairman to cross examine Mr. Strzok rather than maintain order according to committee rules.
Rep. De Santis explores the bias of Mr. Strzok and has brought a conclusion that bias effected Mr. Strzok work. Mr. Strzok states he is unaware by others regarding his bias. Rep. De Santis states he is confident there is still an investigation of Mr. Strzok’s bias.
Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi brought focus of leaks and their detrimental effect on investgations. The more people aware of a fact the more likely it leaks. Concern there was visceral hatred of Hillary Clinton in the New York City field office and st that time Mr. Giuliani was in touch with active FBI before Mr. Comey announced the issue of the Weiner laptop. That is very interesting. I knew Comey was motivated by somebody regarding Hollary. Guilliani threw the election to Trump after the Russians did their dampest. The entire Comey thing was out of place and proved to be unnecessary after the damage was done to Hillary’s reputation.
Jordan’s questions could not be answered because of the inappropriate venue for the questions. What is Jordan doing there? He is refusing his responsibility in the sexual abuse of wrestlers under his supervision.
Mr. Strzok statements about Trump never being President was a personal statement taken out of context.
This week is a very sad week in the history of the United States for this travesty of a committee meeting and Trump riding roughshod over NATO and then to realize Guilliani accepted Russian influence in the 2016 election and then stirred up enough fear of reprisal against Comey and the FBI for not announcing the Weiner emails is more insult to the country’s integrity. It goes to prove the Republican Party will accept all forms of power to win an election to deliver on promises to cronies like the Kochs. The political machine of the GOP will do anything including placing an unqualified lawyer in the Justice Department to attempt to dismantle an investigation regarding Russian interference. This is Guilliani. I would what he is being paid to overthrow the government of the USA?
The Koch money helped along with Russia, but, it didn’t solely win the seats in 2016.
There needs to be veto proof legislation to protect Mueller from the Russian traitor currently in the Justice Department. There also needs to be funding established to carry out the reunification of immigrate families and a dedicated unit within HHS to conduct background checks of parents waiting for their children. Both these issues need to be addressed now.
Ms, Clifford and legal lap dance
It sounds as though Ms. Clifford was engaged in a “Lap Dance” when the officer asked if she could put her face between her breasts. In most strip clubs a “Lap Dance” requires the patron to keep there hands off the exotic dancer. The legal idea is that prostitution begins when there is an interaction that is engaged by at least two individuals for money. The reason touching is prohibited is that it is no longer an exotic dance performance for the individual patron but a sexual engagement.
The idea a person’s face isn’t going to come in contact in a Lap Dance with
Ms. Clifford’s breasts is unrealistic. Now, the officer said she requested it and even then within the context of a Lap Dance it isn’t illegal. I mean where is
Ms. Clifford going to put her breasts that it won’t happen so she probably allowed it in conversation for logistical purposes.
It should be known that Lap Dances by exotic dancers are outside that of a stage performance normally. It is unclear the exact interaction, no one knows if the cop was on stage as well. Anyway, the interaction was not illegal because hands were not involved and further expectation of pleasure to orgasm was not within Ms. Clifford’s performance. If the cop orgasmed during a Lap Dance or during a stage performance it is not within Ms. Clifford’s ability to control. This is entrapment and basically the cop is over reaching in order to shut Guilliani up.
Ms. Clifford is in precarious circumstances and I am sure she would talk more about her particular star quality trade craft if she could. I am curious if the club sold alcoholic beverages which also impacts the degree of nudity allowed and/or encouraged by patrons for tips by the exotic performance. Also curious if the establishment was given any kind of citation because Ms. Clifford was the only one filmed entering the police station.
The idea a person’s face isn’t going to come in contact in a Lap Dance with
Ms. Clifford’s breasts is unrealistic. Now, the officer said she requested it and even then within the context of a Lap Dance it isn’t illegal. I mean where is
Ms. Clifford going to put her breasts that it won’t happen so she probably allowed it in conversation for logistical purposes.
It should be known that Lap Dances by exotic dancers are outside that of a stage performance normally. It is unclear the exact interaction, no one knows if the cop was on stage as well. Anyway, the interaction was not illegal because hands were not involved and further expectation of pleasure to orgasm was not within Ms. Clifford’s performance. If the cop orgasmed during a Lap Dance or during a stage performance it is not within Ms. Clifford’s ability to control. This is entrapment and basically the cop is over reaching in order to shut Guilliani up.
Ms. Clifford is in precarious circumstances and I am sure she would talk more about her particular star quality trade craft if she could. I am curious if the club sold alcoholic beverages which also impacts the degree of nudity allowed and/or encouraged by patrons for tips by the exotic performance. Also curious if the establishment was given any kind of citation because Ms. Clifford was the only one filmed entering the police station.
Christmas is here, Trump is corrupt.
The financial markets have been dropping steadily from an all time high in January 2017. The rise in the past week is enthusiasm that Trimp will use his power to remove any road blocks that lobbyists request. That past week was confidence in corruption and is a very soft recovery because there is nothing substantial behind it.
There can be real money taken with corruption at work, but, ultimately there is litigation from some hurt by the corruption.
There can be real money taken with corruption at work, but, ultimately there is litigation from some hurt by the corruption.
Should have seen this one coming.
It is called entrapment and by the sounds of it the Vice Squad was frustrated in being unsuccessful to date and pressed their luck. Ms. Clifford should declare “Not Guilty” and write the chapter of her book about abuse of power by Rudy Giuliani.
It is obvious who the real perpetrator is. Now, the authorities can go even further and threaten to take her daughter and sorts of things in attempts to pressure her to end her defamation lawsuit.
Adult film stars are quite well informed about what is a violation of prostitution laws and what are not. It is difficult to believe a successful porn star would dive into prostitution that could end her career.
Rudy Guilliani has been pulling string and lying about Trump as if he has to grow a new truth in the media in attempts to inflate Trumps name so no implication from investigations and lawsuits will interrupt his public image. That methodology is how Trump was elected in the first place.
To note, there have been times when Trump has called Guilliani incorrect in his lies and assertions stating they hadn’t talk in a week or more.
I am sorry Ms. Clifford has to go through all this. This is entrapment when one of three Vice Officers are the only “Johns” in the room and found a way to touch Ms. Danielles inappropriately or vice versa. I hope there are tapes and not just testimony in a he said, she said.
What next?
It is obvious who the real perpetrator is. Now, the authorities can go even further and threaten to take her daughter and sorts of things in attempts to pressure her to end her defamation lawsuit.
Adult film stars are quite well informed about what is a violation of prostitution laws and what are not. It is difficult to believe a successful porn star would dive into prostitution that could end her career.
Rudy Guilliani has been pulling string and lying about Trump as if he has to grow a new truth in the media in attempts to inflate Trumps name so no implication from investigations and lawsuits will interrupt his public image. That methodology is how Trump was elected in the first place.
To note, there have been times when Trump has called Guilliani incorrect in his lies and assertions stating they hadn’t talk in a week or more.
I am sorry Ms. Clifford has to go through all this. This is entrapment when one of three Vice Officers are the only “Johns” in the room and found a way to touch Ms. Danielles inappropriately or vice versa. I hope there are tapes and not just testimony in a he said, she said.
What next?
Authoring ones own identity
Anyone of the USA political right wing, including the viewership, knows it is sometimes necessary to inflate or self-author (another word for lie) ones public identity. That trick was learned in “Game of Thrones” in Season 2 I believe when Cerci tells King Joffrey he has to claim heroic acts by those under his rule as his own . She insists a king has to have a heroic history of his life that is true or based in lies. She believed in order for the mob to love and embrace their king with loyalty he has to have a self - authored dialogue about his greatness.
Such lessons are invaluable for the Society of Anacronism. Just thought I’d mention that for those wondering why people in politics lie about themselves and events, etc. Just something to think about.
Such lessons are invaluable for the Society of Anacronism. Just thought I’d mention that for those wondering why people in politics lie about themselves and events, etc. Just something to think about.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)