The Kavanaugh Cases.

October 22, 2019

The President (click here for video as well - thank you) called the emoluments clause of the Constitution ‘phony.’ However, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals appears to disagree. The court announced that it will hear arguments over his potential violation of that clause in early December. Meanwhile, the Manhattan district attorney struck a deal with the President’s lawyers over the President’s tax returns. But depending on the opinion of the 2nd Circuit, either side could take the case to the Supreme Court. Former US Attorney and Former FBI Senior Official Chuck Rosenberg joins Katy Tur to discuss.

..But, (click here) as Marrero also appeared to recognize, the largest problem with Trump’s argument is that it appears to be irreconcilable with the Supreme Court’s decision requiring Nixon to turn over the White House tapes. As now–Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh observed in an article he wrote in 1998, the Nixon decision stands for the proposition that a president must turn over “relevant evidence in criminal proceedings,” absent a specific claim of a threat to national security....

86 Geo. L.J. 2133 
Georgetown Law Journal 
July, 1998 Symposium
The Independent Counsel Act 
From Watergate to Whitewater and Beyond Contribution Brett M. Kavanaugh a1 Copyright (c) 1998 by the Georgetown Law Journal Association; Brett M. Kavanaugh

"The President and the Independent Counsel" (click here)

There is no immunity from impeachment, no matter if a Supreme Court Associate Justice is corrupt to the core. The primary reason Kavanaugh was nominated to the Supreme Court was to protect Trump from the investigation, etc.

Judge Marrero has advised the parties to mitigate their differences because no matter how much Kavanaugh "brown nose's" Trump's corruption fears there are still clearly three branches of government intended to "check and balance" the power within the USA Constitution.

Trump will never be empowered to be a king no matter how much he exercises obstruction of the Congress.

Are the Kurds indigienous to northern Syria?

We know who the conspirators are.

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (click here)

Article I 

The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

We also know the facilitator. The G-20 of 2017 was obviously the beginning of the triad of power to cause the demise of the Kurdish people in northern Syria. The USA, Russia and Turkey. There was no representation of the Kurds.

July 8, 2017

President Recep Tayyip (click here) Erdoğan and U.S. President Donald Trump held an unscheduled meeting on July 8 as a part of the G-20 summit in Hamburg.

The two leaders held a nearly half hour meeting before the closing session of the G20 summit, Turkish officials have said without giving more details.

Erdoğan also had a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on July 8 morning; the two leaders discussed the conflict in Syria and other regional issues.

The two-day summit of world’s 20 major economies (G20) will end later on July 8. President Erdoğan is expected to hold a news conference at the end of the summit.

The summit hosted by Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel had focused on global economy, climate change and the fight against terrorism. 

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. 
     (as in USA southern border crossers)

Article III

The following acts shall be punishable: 

(a) Genocide;

(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;

(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

(d) Attempt to commit genocide;

(e) Complicity in genocide.

The United Nations and The Hague need to decide if the Kurds are imposed upon in a way that forces them away from their homeland and if that displacement will result in cultural shifts that destroy the essence of the Kurds in other countries or basically refuge. Are the Kurds now refugees and do they have the right of return because otherwise, their continued life in their homeland would have resulted in genocide.

Talk English.