Monday, April 20, 2020

There is a huge communication gap between the president and the states.

I am going to try to straighten this out with my fingers crossed.

To begin the word "reagents" is pronounced "re-a-gents." Merrium-Webster probably does this better, re·​agent | \ rē-ˈā-jən (click here to listen).]

Secondly, the president is stating there are large numbers of "platforms" not utilized by the governors, with LabCorp (click here) and another commercial lab and the name escapes me but I think it begins with a Q.


The platforms for testing is not the issue. Obviously, it is not the issue as the president is attempting to tell the governors they are wasting money.


The problem is that the SPECIMENS needed to be tested DO NOT HAVE THE LABORATORY MEDIUM to replicate the virus and come to a definitive diagnosis. THE LABORATORY MEDIUM are the REAGENTS. These reagents are not the transfer medium, they are the living substance that will provide a clear understanding of the RNA that replicates in the DNA.


The process used IN THE LAB is seeking cDNA (synthetic DNA).



I am borrowing this illustration from Wikipedia. I hope it is understandable in realizing what is occurring in the dynamics of finding a POSITIVE result.

Below is from a list of professionals that use this process to identify SARS-CoV-2.

Comments sent out on Thursday 2nd April 2020

Prof Robin May, Professor of Infectious Disease and Director of the Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, said:

“SARS-COV-2 is an RNA virus, (click here) which means that its genome is based not on DNA, but on RNA (a closely-related molecule).  Detecting the virus relies on specifically detecting a ‘sequence’ of RNA that is unique to this virus, converting it into DNA and then amplifying that DNA (essentially, making copies of it) via a process called PCR (polymerase chain reaction).  The conversion of RNA to DNA requires one enzyme (reverse transcriptase) and then amplifying the DNA requires another (polymerase).  Both of these enzymes are biological molecules that have to be produced (typically in bacteria), then purified, usually only in small scale.  Normally, demand for these enzymes is very steady and relatively low, so scaling up to the massive quantities that are required for COVID19 testing takes time.  In addition, it is critical to ensure ‘quality control’ of the extraordinarily large number of kits that must be produced, to minimise the risk of false positive/negatives.  Tackling all of these rate-limiting steps together to eliminate all of the bottlenecks is the primary reason why testing has been relatively slow to roll-out so far.”

The illustration shows the process of the RNA in its use of reverse transcriptase in creating nucleic chains of DNA. Literally, the enzyme acts as a zipper and brings the RNA and DNA together to replicate the virus.

Basically, very basically, the MEDIA used to grow the cDNA is a living solution. These are not simply chemicals in a tube. So, reverse transcriptase is an enzyme found in living beings. It is put into the media along with a purified polymerase to allow the RNA VIRUS to feel at home and begin a chain reaction that produces cDNA that reveals it's presence. I took license with some of this, but, this is basically the idea. 


The problem today in the USA is that these biological elements of the test media are not yet in qualities that can result in large numbers of tests required to test all Americans to the maximum.


HOWEVER.


There is a revolution happening in this method of testing for some time now. I would not be surprised if there is a new technology that is going to be introduced within a matter of weeks that solves the problems currently experienced in the USA. Below
 is a discussion between scientists that demonstrate sensitivity to this idea. Viruses are an important part of medical research because they are so disruptive to any country, both socially and economically and that does not even begin to count the number of people that were killed by viruses.

Just the title to this professional article relays the idea of frustration with the status quo.

J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jan; 51(1): 2–8. Richard L. Hodinka and Laurent Kaiser. "Is the Era of Viral Culture Over in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory?"


...In the fast-paced medical world (click here) of wanting or needing an immediate and accurate diagnosis, viral culture has lost its place and relative importance in diagnostic virology. To me, as a director of a busy hospital-based clinical virology laboratory, there is nothing more disheartening than to invest considerable time, labor, and resources in test systems that yield less-than-adequate results in a less-than-timely fashion. In such a setting, the impact on clinical care and patient management is diminished and the overall effectiveness of the laboratory is called into question by those who use its services. Within the past 3 decades, we have experienced a significant change in the diagnostic landscape with the development of a variety of molecular technologies designed to rapidly and accurately detect, differentiate, and quantify many different viruses of medical importance. Led by real-time PCR, applications of these molecular methods appear endless and their use is now commonplace in larger academic medical centers and tertiary-care facilities and is expanding into smaller laboratories and even to the point of care as simpler and more accessible testing platforms come to market....

The idea of CHANGING methods receives a lot of resistance simply because it is new and UNPROVEN. If there is a testing regime that can be used to test everyone on the horizon I would not be surprised if the new method is being scrutinized in a more rapid method to improve the circumstances in the USA.

I really want people to understand the depth of knowledge these professionals have in their understanding of life. They know there is a delicate balance in the human body that consists of a wide array of knowledge of biochemistry. When a physician makes decisions about therapeutics, be they biochemical or physical therapy, they do so with a deep understanding of the human body. THE REASON these processes take so much time to develop, such as vaccines, is because of that depth of knowledge and COMPLETE NEED to understand what a vaccine does to that graceful balance of the body's biochemistry.

To put this in the simplest terms possible, the states are unable to use the large numbers of platforms because they don't have enough of the STUFF needed to process THE SAMPLE of the virus from the patient.

I suppose the USA can isolate itself and take back all it's money, but, the adverse effects of that idea will come to roost.

  • The World Health Organization (WHO),(click here) founded in 1948, is a specialized agency of the United Nations with a broad mandate to act as a coordinating authority on international health issues.
  • The U.S. government (U.S.) has long been actively engaged with WHO, providing financial and technical support as well as participating in its governance structure.
  • The U.S. has been the largest contributor to WHO.
  • WHO faces challenges including a broad mandate with limited, inflexible funding, and bureaucratic complexity. It has instituted changes to address prior weaknesses in its health emergencies program, and has played a major role in responding to a number of outbreaks recently.
  • WHO is currently helping coordinate a worldwide response to COVID-19, which it declared to be public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on January 30, and a global pandemic on March 11, 2020.
  • In April, the White House announced it would be suspending financial support for WHO pending a review of the organization’s activities related to the COVID-19 pandemic, with President Trump stating the U.S. contributes “between $400 million and $500 million per year to the WHO.” Assessed contributions from the U.S. to the WHO have ranged from $107 to $119 million over the last decade. The U.S. has also made additional voluntary contributions, ranging from $102 to $401 million per year....
  • ...The agency has played a key role in a number of global health achievements, such as the Alma-Ata Declaration on primary health care (1978), the eradication of smallpox (formally recognized in 1980), the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (adopted in 2003), and the 2005 revision of the International Health Regulations (IHR), an international agreement that outlines roles and responsibilities in preparing for and responding to international health emergencies....
  • ...WHO has two primary sources of revenue:
    • assessed contributions (set amounts expected to be paid by member-state governments, scaled by income and population) and
    • voluntary contributions (other funds provided by member states, plus contributions from private organizations and individuals).
    Most assessed contributions are considered “core” funding, meaning they are flexible funds that are often used to cover general expenses and program activities. Voluntary contributions, on the other hand, are often “specified” funds, meaning they are earmarked by donors for certain activities....
April 20, 2020

Strong to severe thunderstorms (click here) are taking aim in parts of the Southeast today as an area of low pressure tracks eastward.

The lingering threat of severe storms today is in parts of northern and central Florida. Damaging wind gusts and hail are the main concerns, but an isolated tornado cannot be ruled out.

NOAA's Storm Prediction Center has issued a pair of watches:

-A tornado watch remains in effect until 11 a.m. EDT for parts of northeast Florida to coastal Georgia. This watch area includes Jacksonville, Florida.

-A severe thunderstorm watch is in effect until 3 p.m. EDT for a large part of central Florida, including Daytona Beach, Orlando and the Tampa-St. Petersburg metro areas.

A few strong to severe storms with gusty winds or hail could linger over northern and central parts of Florida into the afternoon hours.
"Morning Papers"

The Rooster

"Okeydoke"

April 19, 2020
By Karen DeYoung, Lena H. Sun and Emily Rauhala

More than a dozen (click here) U.S. researchers, physicians and public health experts, many of them from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, were working full time at the Geneva headquarters of the World Health Organization as the novel coronavirus emerged late last year and transmitted real-time information about its discovery and spread in China to the Trump administration, according to U.S. and international officials.

A number of CDC staff members are regularly detailed to work at the WHO in Geneva as part of a rotation that has operated for years. Senior Trump-appointed health officials also consulted regularly at the highest levels with the WHO as the crisis unfolded, the officials said.

The presence of so many U.S. officials undercuts President Trump’s assertion that the WHO’s failure to communicate the extent of the threat, born of a desire to protect China, is largely responsible for the rapid spread of the virus in the United States....

...But the president, who often touts a personal relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping and is reluctant to inflict damage on a trade deal with Beijing, appears to view the WHO as a more defenseless target.

In a statement provided to The Washington Post after online publication of this article, Caitlin B. Oakley, a spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services, confirmed that in January, HHS had 17 staff members, including 16 from the CDC, at the WHO, “working on a variety of programs, including covid-19 and Ebola.” She emphasized that the staff members were not “decision-makers.”...

I might add, the idea U.S. researchers, physicians, and public health experts are not decision-makers of US policy is throughout the practice of those professionals. They have a "practice" and have the skills to investigate and report the truth, but, those facts are submitted to government authority to protect the people that the government provides protection.

We see a level of dismissal of the truth in the federal government of the USA in regard to the climate crisis. That dismissal of the truth has translated into politics for decades rather than policy. The idea Trump was playing politics with a deadly virus is more than unconscionable, it is an assault against the American people for his own politics.

The understanding that scientists once employed directly in China were removed is a very worrisome reality considering the attempt by Trump to turn COVID-19 into the common flu. Americans could have received the warning far earlier than even the WHO if those scientists were in place.

"Good Night, Moon"

The waning crescent

26.8 days old moon

8.0 percent lit

The USA is back!

April 17, 2020
By Jennifer Leman

May 27. (click here) That's the tentative date that NASA will send astronauts Bob Behnken and Douglas Hurley aboard SpaceX's Crew Dragon capsule and Falcon 9 rocket to the International Space Station. If all goes according to plan, they will launch at 4:32 p.m. from Launch Pad 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the agency announced April 14.

It will be the first time American astronauts will be launched aboard an American-built rocket from American soil since the final launch of the space shuttle in 2011. NASA astronauts currently grab a lift to the ISS aboard Roscosmos' Soyuz rockets, which launch from the Baikonur cosmodrome in Kazakhstan....