The article at the title to this entry attempts to make the concept of political diversion palatable. It is actually treason, but, needs to be a VALIDATING language within the intelligence community, both domestic and international.
There should be no hurdles to 'effective' language between any intelligence service with another and those logistics need to be fine tuned. This is burgeoning 2010, there is no reason for these hideous issues to exist.
Let's try to work on that, okay?
One might find 'that concept' is what bolsters the Pakistani ISI. To the extent that brings its own instability needs to be tempted. Thought I'd mention it. The Pakistani ISI is the 'stop gap' between 'the street' and the government.
PAKISTAN has a terrorist problem, as many of the country's leaders acknowledge. But Pakistan also has an ISI problem - the country's powerful Inter-Services Intelligence agency pursues its own agenda for its own reasons. And civilian leaders there have been too hesitant to challenge it....