Wednesday, November 21, 2018

Women need options in supporting their families and girls need the information about sex, sexuality and ultimately the end of teenage pregnancy.

There is not a woman in this world that doesn't see pregnancy with reflection and options. When a girl becomes pregnant there is a crime either by men or the government for not protecting her from her own innocence.

November 17, 2018

By Katherine Hignett

Stormy Daniels blasted the state of America’s sex education (click here) Thursday in a speech to the Oxford Union debating society.

The adult film actress—real name Stephanie Clifford—blamed a lack of shame-free advice for young people as being the cause of problems including unwanted pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.


People that oppose “open and well-rounded sex education,” she added, “are fueling the very social problems they say they are trying to prevent.”


Daniels was speaking to an audience made up mostly of Oxford University students during an event entitled “Sex, Guns and Other Fluff: How Porn Can Set You Free.”


“Don't want abortions? Then help prevent unwanted pregnancies by teaching young people about their bodies in an honest, open and shame-free way,” she told the crowd.


“As a matter of fact, open, factual discussion about sex is the best way to prevent a whole bunch of social problems: STDs, assault, sexual dysfunction,” she said. “Maybe [even] having Donald Trump as president.”...


...Who Supports Sex Education? (click here)


Sex Education is widely supported by the vast majority of people in the United States. In Planned Parenthood’s most recent poll on sex education, 93 percent of parents supported having sex education taught in middle school, and 96 percent of parents supported having sex education taught in high school. The vast majority of parents support sex education in middle school and high school that covers a wide range of topics, including STDs, puberty, healthy relationships, contraception, and sexual orientation. Other national, state and local polls on sex education have shown similarly high levels of support.


Sex education is supported by numerous prestigious health and medical organizations including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Over 150 organizations are members of the National Coalition to Support Comprehensive Sexuality Education....


November 14, 2018

By Rekha Basu

...During a gubernatorial debate, (click here) Reynolds was asked what issue she would not compromise on. She answered, "Life.” Earlier this year Reynolds signed a law that makes most abortions illegal. The fetal heartbeat law, on hold pending a court ruling, bars abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy. Now Maggie DeWitte,  the spokeswoman for the Coalition of Pro-Life Leaders, says of their legislative priorities, “Our goal is to eliminate abortion, period.”


Let's look to the Dominican Republic, where abortion is illegal, period: Women and girls can be sent to prison for up to two years for inducing their own abortions. Medical professionals who perform them can get up to 20 years. Though prison is rare, according to an upcoming report by Human Rights Watch, the threats are effective in a country where nearly half of pregnancies are unplanned or unwanted. Women and girls interviewed by the nonprofit organization described being depressed, terrified, desperate, or trapped when they learned they were pregnant. 


The worst affected are those from rural areas and of low income. The risks to life and health from illegal abortions are higher when the providers are underground. Abortion recipients told HRW of abuse, neglect and mistreatment by some providers. Some pregnant people use dangerous techniques to end their pregnancies such as denying themselves food or water. "One woman said she beat her belly with a concrete block," the report said. The country's public health ministry attributes 8 percent of maternal deaths to complications from illegal abortions or miscarriages. Twenty-five thousand women and girls seek medical attention for complications related to abortion or miscarriage each year....


The truth is the truth. There has been a reduction in teen pregnancy on a regular basis during the Obama years. There is no clear consensus as to the reason for the reductions, but, teens had access to information and contraception, including abstinence. Teens can make clear decisions to opt out of pregnancy when they have good and consistent information and not myths. This is the best path for women. Information and access to contraception. No one wants a woman or girl to face abortion, but, it has to be a part of the decisions women make. That is the facts.

CDC

Teen birth rates declined from 2014 to 2015 (click here) for all races and for Hispanics. Among 15- to 19-year-olds, teen birth rates decreased:
  • 10% for Asian/Pacific Islanders
  • 9% for non-Hispanic blacks
  • 8% for Hispanics
  • 8% for non-Hispanic whites
  • 6% for American Indian/Alaska Natives (AI/AN)
In 2015, the birth rate of Hispanic teens were still more than two times higher than the rate for non-Hispanic white teens. The birth rate of non-Hispanic black teens was almost twice as high as the rate among non-Hispanic white teens, and American Indian/Alaska Native teen birth rates remained more than one and a half times higher than the non-Hispanic white teen birth rate.  Geographic differences in teen birth rates persist, both within and across states.  Among some states with low overall teen birth rates, some counties have high teen birth rates.
Less favorable socioeconomic conditions, such as low education and low income levels of a teen’s family, may contribute to high teen birth rates. Teens in child welfare systems are at higher risk of teen pregnancy and birth than other groups. For example, young women living in foster care are more than twice as likely to become pregnant than those not in foster care....


Senator Chuck Grassley is leaving as chairman of the US Senate Judiciary Committee.

Senator Chuck Grassley is typical of the US Senate Republican majority that will be maintained after January 2019. Just because there is a change in leadership to Graham doesn't mean women will be considered an equal. The right wing does not recognize women as leaders. They don't believe women have a right to their own bodies. They don't believe there is a place for contraception, especially if it means postponing parenthood because a woman is successful in pursuing a career. That means discrimination due to gender should never be an issue.

Let me be clear when a woman's body is an issue in regard to contraception and abortion that IS GENDER DISCRIMINATION. Women have a right to define their futures and the future of their children to be comfortable achievers supported by wealthy women.

Women have made incredible strides in the most recent election. We have to continue to find success and demonstrate far better leadership than the leadership that continues to victimize women and victimized women in the past.

By Kevin Freking

Washington - Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa (click here) is giving up the chairmanship of the Senate Judiciary Committee after shepherding 84 of President Donald Trump's judicial nominees through the confirmation process over the past two years, including Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.


Grassley said he plans to become chairman of the Senate Finance Committee next year. To do that, he'll have to give up the gavel of the Judiciary Committee, which he has held since 2015. Democrats have accused Grassley of unfairly disregarding Senate protocols and courtesies to get Trump's nominees confirmed.


The move paves the way for Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. to become the next Judiciary chairman. Graham has become a close Trump ally and was a vocal supporter of Kavanaugh's confirmation, pushing back against sexual misconduct allegations, which Kavanaugh denied....


October 6, 2018

By John Bowden

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) (click here) explained his comments about the lack of female senators serving on the Judiciary panel in a Fox News interview Saturday.


The Republican chairman was criticized on Friday after he told reporters that the committee's heavy workload was one reason why more female senators may choose not to serve on the committee.


“It’s a lot of work — maybe they don’t want to do it,” Grassley said Friday. “My chief of staff of 33 years tells me we’ve tried to recruit women and we couldn’t get the job done.”


“We have a hard time getting men on the committee. It’s just a lot of work whether you’re a man or a woman, it doesn’t matter,” he added later, clarifying his remarks....


September 22, 2018

By Grace Segers

Garrett Ventry, (click here) a communications adviser and spokesman for Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, has resigned. NBC News, which first reported the resignation, said the decision came after the outlet "raised questions about Ventry's employment history" and a sexual harassment allegation against him.


Ventry was helping with the GOP's response to an allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted Christine Blasey Ford 36 years ago at a party.


NBC reported Saturday that Ventry had worked as a social media adviser in 2017 in North Carolina House Majority Leader John Bell's office. It reported that "sources familiar with the situation" said Ventry was let go "after parts of his resume were found to have been embellished, and because he faced an accusation of sexual harassment from a female employee of the North Carolina General Assembly's Republican staff."


In a statement to CBS News Saturday, Ventry said, "I deny allegations of misconduct at the NC House." He said he submitted his resignation to the Senate Judiciary Committee "to not be a distraction to their work."


"Garrett was one of several temporary staff brought on to assist in the committee's consideration of the Supreme Court nomination, a team that has done outstanding work," a committee spokesman told CBS News. "While he strongly denies allegations of wrongdoing, he decided to resign to avoid causing any distraction from the work of the committee."...


September 27, 2018
By Progress Iowa
Daily Kos
Tax March
MoveOn
CREDO
One Wisconsin Now
Americans for Democratic Action Iowa
Iowa Citizen Action Network
Courage Campaign
Why Courts Matter Pennsylvania
Citizen Advocacy Center
Battle Born Progress
Joyce Moore Financial Services
TaxMarch MN
NCJW Southern Maine
Sisterhood of Iowa
Indivisible Chester County
Indivisible Berks
Progress Michigan
Progressive Turnout Project
Indivisible York
Why Courts Matter Iowa
ProgressNow Colorado
Indivisible Iowa
Pennsylvania Together
Youth Progressive Action Catalyst
Keystone Progress
Forward Montana Foundation
Progress Virginia
Cumberland Valley Rising
Indivisible Iowa SD 33/34/35
March for our Lives
End Citizens United
Susquehanna Valley Progress
Granite State Progress
Columbia County Indivisible
Tuesdays With Toomey Philadelphia
Philly Neighborhood Networks
Women's Medical Fund
Indivisible Clinton County PA
Indivisible KY
One Iowa Action
ProgressNow Arizona
Susquehanna Valley Progress
Torah Trumps Hate
Indivisible Iowa
Buchanan County Indivisible
Manchester Area Progressive Alliance (Indivisible)
Regina Russell, Elected Dem Cmte Women, Sunbury, Pa
Justice For All
412 Resistance
Central PA Action Agenda

Dear Senator Grassley:

We, the undersigned, (click here) are writing today to request your resignation as Chair of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary.

We are organizations and leaders from across the country, and have watched with alarm as you have taken the bipartisan institution of the Judiciary Committee and injected partisan politics and misogynistic bullying into its leadership. There are many of us who have expressed public disagreement with your decisions in the past, but this goes beyond simply disagreeing with your stance on a nominee or a policy position. Your actions have threatened the independent nature of the judiciary, a bedrock institution that must provide a check on the executive and legislative branches in order for our democracy to thrive....
Mississippi is ranked 51st in median household income. Yes, 51st because the District of Columbia is 2nd behind Maryland. Doesn’t Mississippi want new leadership to deliver them out of misery that spans generations?

Ivanka Trump used personal email for White House business (click here for article - thank you)

Donald Trump creates distractions to maintain control over the politics. Now it is a demand for arrests by Whitaker of Hillary Clinton and James Comey. LOOK, immediately after Trump fired Comey over the media and not in person; he invited the Russians to provide classified information.

He is complaining James Comey has legal issues? Really? What is his legal issues that are going to lock him up, the fact he would not pledge loyalty to a president that provides extremely secret documents to the Russians?

Hillary Clinton used a personal server. (click here) for government business? Really? Ivanka doesn't even begin to cover that allegation as if a crime. Let's talk about the TRUMP COMPANY PRIVATE SERVER and it's repeated connections to Alpha Bank in Russia.

Was the information provided the Russians in PAYMENT for issues with Alpha Bank? Was putting a former Alpha Bank administrator in the US Justice Department part of the deal?

Trump's political rhetoric is based on old stereotypes like his statements about judges in the Ninth Circuit. The reason there are many divisions in the country whereby Circuits are set up is that the enormous size of the USA requires different judges to decide about state law and otherwise, including issues that are dictated by geography.

Now, I know that is too complicated for Trump to begin to sort it out, but, his rhetoric is based in old stereotypes that are full of hate that NO ONE besides him and is disillusioned base seems to care about. It is time Trump take an example from Alabama and it's movement currently to remove old corrupt paradigms that harm citizens.

Trump has NO ROOM TO TALK when it comes to criminal activity and the Republicans are the most shameful party that ever existed in this country. I don't know of another party as corrupt as this one. How could they allow a president to hand over highly classified material to the Russians?

HOW DID THAT HAPPEN !?!

May 16, 2017
By Matt Novak

President Trump in the Oval Office with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Russian ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak and unnamed staff on Wednesday, May 10, 2017

On Monday, (click hereThe Washington Post broke the story that President Trump told Russian officials highly classified information when he met with them in the Oval Office last week. The story has been verified by multiple news outlets, and even Trump himself seemed to verify the story in tweets from this morning. But what kind of information was it?

According to the Post, the information that Trump shared with the Russians is what’s called “Code Word” classified. That’s higher than the classification known as Top Secret.

The lowest level of classification is known as Confidential, followed by Secret and Top Secret. The next level is known as Code Word classified. It provides an extra level above Top Secret to compartmentalize information so that only the most high-level American officials who need to know it can see it. As Amy Zegart at The Atlantic put it, Code Word classification is so obscure that “even fake spies rarely refer to it in the movies.”...

 

Want more victims over Thanksgiving, Donald?

This amounts to the disparity in the mind of Trump that amuses him. He and the First Lady took the week off, except, for holiday activities at the White House and now they are in Maralago, Mara something.

The Mouth needs to be reined in. We know the consequence of the angry words by Trump, it needs to stop. Today, while he enjoys his power and status in creating a week-long holiday for himself, his boredom and obsessive-compulsive observance of any political tone are again ruining at least the holidays for some. I guarantee the judges under verbal attack by Trump are beefing up their security right now.

The Congress needs to get a restraining order against Trump. His political bias is a real problem when it rises to hatred and angry words. We don't want any more dead Americans, let alone judges. He does NOT know how to conduct himself within the restraints of the presidency and there has to be something the Congress can do with him.

April 25, 2005
By Matthew Segal

Recently, hatred against judges (click here) has even resulted in violence--from disgruntled defendants and convicts. On April 6, white supremacist Matthew Hale was sentenced to 40 years' imprisonment for soliciting the murder of federal judge Joan Lefkow--the same judge whose husband and mother were recently killed by someone else. And rape defendant Brian Nichols now stands accused of killing a Georgia Superior Court judge and three others in connection with his March escape from an Atlanta courthouse.

It may be a stretch to connect the criticism of controversial decisions with the violence that has occurred, or may occur in the future--but some Republicans have done so. For instance, Senator John Cornyn said recently that "raw political or ideological decisions" could help to explain this violence. He implied that Congressional intervention in judicial decisionmaking was necessary in order to forestall additional violence.

Meanwhile, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay ominously remarked, referring to the judges who declined to prohibit the removal of Terry Schiavo's feeding tube, "The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior." Senator Frank Lautenberg felt so strongly about this comment that he wrote DeLay a letter stating that DeLay's comments "may violate a Federal criminal statute" prohibiting threats against federal judges.

How can we protect our judges from violence? Answering this question is more difficult than it might seem--and simply hiring more U.S. Marshals, while a good idea, doesn't address why judges are threatened. Tragically, our system may preclude perfect--or near-perfect--protection of our judges....
Why are there 8235 federal employees on unemployment? Why is that total an increase of 533 from the week before? Why the purge of long time federal employees?

Who are they? What are their qualifications? What are their impressions about their dismissal? I am fairly certain there are exit interviews when they leave their government positions. 

My guess is many are inspectors and regulators. Yes? No? Someone needs to chase this down because it is highly unusual. It also appears to be leading up to a government shutdown to justify the purging. Staging. I have to wonder if there is unjustified staging to CYA. Additionally, where has the money from those salaries gone?

What is taking their place? Nothing? Trump is simply throwing people off their jobs?

Donald Trump’s rhetoric operates on old stereotypes. In other words government employees are just sitting around doing nothing but reducing the unemployment rate. That stereotype is frequently racist because many minorities find employment in government positions. I would also expect that reduction in federal employees to have an impact in the states’ government and the private sector. So, what gives? 

I might point out most if not all those jobs are Middle Class jobs. Most government jobs are stable jobs and that is what attracts people to them. In that reality is that federal employees become a part of the brick and mortar of the federal government. With a purging of federal jobs the performance of the government will change.

Are the child detention numbers increasing because their are few to no federal workers carrying out evaluations and reunification or internal placement of those children? Also, why are the children being told they are in jail? They did nothing wrong except love their parents and survive the violence of their country. So, why are the detained children treated as criminals?