Pakistan should give pause to Response.

The last thing Pakistan should be start a war with India. The two countries have common concerns to deal with in the fact that terrorists have dominated Kashmir for a long time.

There is no reason for dead children and innocent people, but, obviously there was no communication between the two countries regarding the terrorists targeted. There should be clarification of Pakistan’s purpose in retaliation.

It is clear these attacks were not of government structures. The attacks were to be successful as a surprise aggression to terrorist sites. If Pakistan believes starting a war with India over terrorist deaths is a good idea, it might open up a war it is not bargaining for. 

Pakistan and India should be conferencing to resolve the problems with this attack and find a way forward to end terrorist attacks into India. An investigation to the deaths is prudent. People can be held responsible for targeting innocent people. A full scale invasion is not appropriate until the facts are known. Pakistan should not be defending or asking their own military to suffer losses in defending the violence by terrorists within their borders.$

(Click here)

(Click here)

This is called racketeering.

It is paid protection sanctioned by Congress. Law firms, universities, etc. pay Trump $100 million and they are not attacked by him through the powers AVAILABLE to Trump by sheer office of the presidency.

If Congress were doing its job, Trump would be impeached for the crimes he is committing from the Oval Office.

And Kennedy and Graham better not be saying Bondi has to bring Trump up on charges before Congress can call this a crime. Bondi is just as corrupt as Trump is and it appears she is looking the other way.

How many lawyers are in Congress and they don’t recognize racketeering? Graham was a member of the JAG Corp and he can’t recognize High Crimes and Misdemeanors when he sees them?

It all looks open and shut to me. There are highly educated people at the top of all these institutions that can provide testimony. Retribution, paid protection, and extortion is not protected by the Supreme Court’s earlier decision. These are all acts against long established institutions for personal gain. 

Questions? 

What seems to be the problem? 

Popularity ratings and disinformation are valid defenses.

(Click here)