Wednesday, March 18, 2009

The problem with Bernanke. The latest cliche, "Don't change the rules in an economic crisis."

Welcome to the Bernanke Big Top where egos are more important than economic stability.


We need regulation and we need to get rid of Bernanke !!!!!!!!! The entire set of values surrounding the USA economy at this point is becoming immoral with the catering to Wall Street and its global focus.

Dollar Rally Crumbles as Fed Ramps Up Printing Press (Update3) (click here)
By Oliver Biggadike and Ye Xie
... Fed policy makers said yesterday they plan to buy as much as $300 billion of U.S. government bonds and step up purchases of mortgage bonds, expanding the central bank’s balance sheet by as much as $1.15 trillion. The extra supply of dollars threatens to overwhelm investors just as the budget deficit swells.
The trade-weighted Dollar Index, which tracks the currency’s performance against the euro, yen, pound, Canadian dollar, Swiss franc and Swedish krona, tumbled 2.7 percent to 84.595, its biggest one-day drop since 1971. That pushed its decline to 5.6 percent since reaching 89.62 on March 4, the highest in almost four years....

...sell the dollar!” said Scott Ainsbury, a portfolio manager who helps manage about $12 billion in currencies at New York-based hedge fund FX Concepts Inc. “This is huge, huge. It’s equivalent to the Plaza accord. This is the last thing they have in the closet, and they used it a bit early.”...
...Yields on 10-year Treasuries declined the most since 1962 after the Fed said it would concentrate purchases in notes due from two to 10 years. The central bank is expanding its quantitative easing policy, which already includes agency and mortgage debt, to more than $1.85 trillion in securities....



"...where the standard rules don't apply. In particular, the argument goes, when there are idle resources lying around, the traditional economic problem of scarcity disappears. The government can prime the pump by throwing borrowed money around, and this can only boost total output, because employed workers produce more than unemployed workers."

He is processing the gross misunderstanding that 'tickle down' works. We know from Bush 41 that 'tickle down' is a myth. It doesn't work. Bernanke is infusing money into the "W"rong place. By indulging financial institutions, Ben Bernanke is stating the old method of trickle down will actually produce jobs in the USA. It won't. The financial institutions that Mr. Bernanke caters to are global international entities with interests in far different places than the USA's backyard.

If Bernanke is allowed to continue in his 'dreamscape' the monies will disappear no different than the Bush/Paulson TARP funds. Bernanke is known for lacking structure in all his policies. He has no intention of defining the use of these funds, monitoring their distribution and quite frankly what will occur is that the USA Fed will be bailing out the entire global economy while being tied to insoluable debt without a growing work force and tax base.

Those monies will disappear, but, they will not generate jobs and hence there will be no house sales. Bernanke cannot make consumers spend and there in lies the problem. The majority of the USA's GDP, to date, relies on consumer spending. It is an economy based on the idea that Americans are wealthy and don't need to work so much as invest.

Bernanke and those like him lack the insight to realize until the USA changes its methods of generating GDP as translated into labor there won't be a recovery. Bernanke can't give houses away, even with a record low mortgage rate, no matter what he tries, simply because, there aren't people 'solvent' to pay for them. The tragic reality of this economic train wreck is when home owners declared bankruptcy it wasn't simply to get out of debt they can't afford and start over, it is because they lost everything. They lost their jobs, equity and assets. There is nothing on the other side of the bankruptcy that can act as a mechanism to 'rebuild' lives.

The crash occurred because of exploitive government with literally no direction except the purpose of exploitation for greed. The hollow Republican adminnistration literally crashed an economy that has no way of regenerating itself. The purpose of the USA over the past eight years has been meaningless. The huge pork barrel budgets of the Republicans dominated the legislature for 'ideological' reasons. There was no solid substance to any of it. It is nearly unfathomable to realize eight years of Republican pork and legislature had no purpose except to legislate morality and defense spending. Even the defense spending served no purpose. The war in Iraq had no basis of purpose and still doesn't except for the fear of the unknown should we leave. The Republican crony spending achieved nothing but a government supported economy in areas that could not be outsourced for greater profit taking. There was no substantive growth in job sectors and when the USA stopped funding an ideology, the economy tanked.

Bernanke's trillion has no meaning, it is not linked with supportive structures that will infuse monies to producing jobs. The Bernanke trillion will go to institutions with debt in other markets and will have no return to economic revitalization of the USA.

Bernanke's only reason for putting forth a trillion US for the global institutions is that it wasn't done during The Great Depression and the lack of monies caused an increase in the contracture for business. That is not the case here. Since the years of the Great Depression, USA businesses and interests have too many tenticles to other markets and foreign lending with obligations outside the USA. The stimulus packages President Obama has put forward including his 2010 budget specifically addresses the revitalization of the USA and its labor force to bring about personal incomes that translate into economic regrowth.

Bernanke is "W"rong and sadly he has no 'idea' for anything different except the lessons of the past which he disregards when it comes to regulation, which the lack of caused these problems in the first place. He needs to be removed from the Fed. There is no predicting his next move and the demise of the USA dollar and vastly increasing debt.

This is profoundly where everything Bernanke is doing falls apart.

President Obama has developed an 'Auto Team' to revitalize the auto industry. In the article below there are guaranteed loans to auto supplier in the amount of $5 billion. Those loan guarantees coming directly from the USA Treasury to banks should not be necessary as the Fed just released an additional trillion US dollar bills to supposedly 'shore up' the banks to they could lend to the auto suppliers and the auto makers. If the suppliers already have made deliveries to the auto makers and are waiting for payment which is slowed by the credit crunch Bernanke's trillion is all that should have to be accessed. The suppliers delivered their product and the automakers have to pay their invoices. Why are there guarantees attached to these monies with a new glut of a trillion US sitting around for the banks to simply pay the suppliers? There are monies available for GM to borrow and it eliminates the need for bailout funds.

Thursday, March 19, 2009
Auto panel focuses on help for suppliers (click here)
Obama administration seeks to guarantee loans in effort to infuse cash to struggling parts makers.
David Shepardson and Gordon Trowbridge / Detroit News Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration's effort to aid struggling auto suppliers is focused on a program to provide guarantees for billions of dollars in money owed to parts makers -- a move that could provide them with badly needed cash.
A number of major suppliers are on the brink of bankruptcy in the face of dramatically lower auto production, and the so-called "credit insurance" program, would enable them to borrow from banks based on what they are owed from automakers.
The government would guarantee the payments if the automaker went bankrupt and could not pay the suppliers' bills....


As far as I am concerned this is double dipping. The bailout of any entity, be it auto makers or banks is completely unnecessary with this new glut of monies, UNLESS, one is stating the 'viability / solvency' of these industries is doomed. Is it? Is the future of automakers doomed and therefore bankruptcy is inevitable and they are not credit worthy? Really? Could have fooled me.

Bernanke's actions are meaningless because they don't have 'targets' as do the stimulus or the automaker bailout funds. The monies proposed to rescue the automakers are for the purpose of revitalizing the USA industry. If not, then there is no reason to proceed. In the case of GM, I do believe their direct funding by the bailout will result in USA jobs and a stable auto economy. The monies Bernanke flooded the market with yesterday have no sincere delivery point except banks and it could be any bank funding anyone or any company. His actions make no sense in the face of a bailout for industries sensitive to the USA recovery.


The Obama Administration needs to concentrate on issues of regulation across the spectrum of the cabinet and stop playing with faux monies.



If this administration wants to stop the continually growing 'complications' of Wall Street to the global economic crisis, then dissove the Fed. That would be a good start.

They are overplaying their hand. Jerks.

There are numerous reasons that the markets fluctuate and one of the most constant factors in the housing market is the interest rate. (click here)




Monthly Average Commitment Rate And Points On 30-Year Fixed-Rate Mortgages Since 1971 (click title to entry - thank you)

Mortgage February 2009 - 5.05

Mortgage February 2008 - 5.92

Mortgage February 2000 - 8.33

Mortgage February 1990 - 10.20




TOPWRAP 7-Fed to buy Treasuries; UK unemployment at 2 mln (click here)
Wed Mar 18, 2009 3:31pm EDT



...The Fed also said it would expand its purchases of mortgage related debt in a bid to lower U.S. home mortgage rates and support the ailing U.S. housing market.



The Fed had already exhausted its main monetary policy lever by lowering benchmark interest rates to between zero and 0.25 percent last December, and many had expected it would soon follow Japan and Britain in pumping money directly into the system.
"This is a pretty dramatic move," said James Caron, head of global rates research at Morgan Stanley in New York. "We think they are buying maturities over seven years. They are trying to bring down all consumer rates."...

Fire Bernanke. He hasn't got a clue. I am sure there is an arrest warrant somewhere in China for him !


Daniel Tarullo, who was designated for a Federal Reserve seat by President-elect Barack Obama, speaks during a news conference in Chicago, Thursday, Dec. 18, 2008. Also introduced was Mary Schapiro, left, as his designate for Securities and Exchange Commission chairman and Gary Gensler, right, as his designate for Commodity Futures Trading Commission chairman and (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)

Shapiro is right about one thing, there needs to be enough staff at the SEC to close the gap on fraud and accountability. There is no way the USA should be siding with Bernanke to carry out more fraud as started under Paulson. A trillion dollars worth is an outrage. How could any Fed Chairman determine SINKING a trillion of funding into more securities will cure the ills. It is MORE of the SAME from the Bush White House and Bernanke needs to go !!! There is no dumping $1,000,000,000,000 into this mess while there isn't even enough safeguards in place to understand what happened under Bush and Paulson or even cast safeguards against it happening again. This is an outrage !!!!!!!!!!

SEC Calls For More Funds To Avert Cuts In Operations (click here)
By Zachary A. Goldfarb
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 12, 2009; Page D01
Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Schapiro warned yesterday that the agency will "make significant cuts in its current operations" this year unless Congress authorizes it to spend more money.
Responding to concerns that the agency failed to detect the alleged Bernard L. Madoff fraud, Schapiro said the SEC is working to improve collection of tips and complaints and detect wrongdoing early on.
"I do not believe it would be wise for the SEC to retrench during such perilous times in our markets," she told a House appropriations subcommittee....




Lawmakers Rally to Restore Uptick Rule (click here)
Washington, D.C. (March 18, 2009) By WebCPA staff
Lawmakers continue to apply pressure to the Securities and Exchange Commission to reinstate a Depression-era rule that prevents traders from short-selling stocks whose share prices are falling.

Sens. Ted Kaufman, D-Del., and Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., have floated a bill requiring the commission to restore the “uptick” rule, which had been discontinued in 2007. Proponents of the reinstatement hope it will discourage selling frenzies. SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro indicated that she was in favor of revisiting the issue of resurrecting the uptick rule. A vote on the rule is scheduled for April 8.

The government's power to avert disaster has been gutted through loss of staff (TAX CUTS AND DOWNSIZING GOVERNMENT) by eight years of Bush and six years of Republican domination. The sad truth is that the USA has to re-establish its 'governance' principles in order to return the country to 'functioning.' The move by Bernanke is to allow more exploitation of the USA dollar and the people of the country. It is more than obvious as there is little more he can 'pull out of his hat' to attempt a recovery. The idea that dumping a trillion dollars onto a corrupt and still corruptible securities market before safeguards are in place or a clear understanding of the 'cause' of this mess is simply the most irresponsible move a Fed Chairman could make. Ain't no way this should be occuring. The 'Obama Stimulus' package over 10 years is working. The SEC needs to be supported in the reestablishment of staff and investigations that reveal the underlying truths of the destruction of the American economy. More jobs, more tax base and the USA will reestablish its economy. Bernanke has to go.

UPDATE 2-SEC looks at more short-selling measures (click here)
Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:43pm EDT
* SEC chief aims to issue uptick rule proposal in April
* SEC chief says more funding needed for fiscal 2009
* SEC mulls asking Congress to expand whistleblower laws
(Recasts with uptick rule plan, adds comments by Schapiro,
other details)
By Rachelle Younglai
WASHINGTON, March 11 (Reuters) - The U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission aims to issue a proposal in April to restore
the so-called uptick rule and will look at other ways to address
short-selling in the stock market, SEC Chairwoman Mary Schapiro
said on Wednesday....



SEC charges Madoff auditors with fraud (click here)

By MarketWatch
Last update: 11:05 a.m. EDT March 18, 2009

BOSTON (MarketWatch) -- The Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday charged the auditors of Bernard Madoff's broker-dealer firm with securities fraud by representing they had performed legitimate audits. The SEC alleged that certified public accountant David Friehling and his firm purported to audit financial statements and disclosures of Madoff's firm, which was at the center of a gigantic Ponzi scheme. "I will ensure that we continue this investigation and hold accountable all those who helped to facilitate this massive fraud," said new SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro in a press release.

There is OBVIOUS fraud and mismanagement with the funds Paulson and Bernanke put forward in TARP. The TARP funds were supposed to purchase bad loans and derivatives. It didn't work because the monies went to pay bills. The financial sector is now HOOKED on this vast spending plan while the Treasury simply prints more money. If TARP didn't work because it was redirected by the banks that took the funds realizing they never had to account for it, why do it again only bigger. Bernanke IS the problem, get rid of him ! It's fraud, it is stealing the future of the USA away from the people and it is a direct insult to the country's sovereignty.

Bernanke isn't even taking into account that Obama and Geithner have already proposed other instruments for purchasing the bad bank loans. The plans are already in the works so people can keep their homes and refinance and the housing market can return to some stability. Bernanke has tunnel vision and sees no restoration of government, but, only the private sector. Bernanke at this point is a toxic asset to the USA. He just is.

Is Cox (click here) still at the SEC?

WHY ?!?!?!?!




It is called a DEPRESSION.

It is called a CRASH.

Widening the tax base by creating jobs across the spectrum of the USA populous is the only 'flyin' way out of this mess and these lunatics need to be replaced and NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!

Fed to Buy $1 Trillion in Securities to Aid Economy

...As expected, the Fed kept its benchmark interest rate at virtually zero. But in a surprise, it dramatically increased the amount of money it will create out of thin air to thaw out the still-frozen credit markets that have cramped lending to consumers and businesses alike....


Geithner takes his lumps along with everyone else. I don't believe he thought he'd be tapped for Treasury.


Tim Geithner May Take Loss on Home Sale (click here)
March 16, 2009 01:19 PM ET
...Geithner, now living in Washington, is trying to sell his five-bedroom Tudor home in the New York City suburbs, and it looks like he'll be taking a loss even if he gets his asking price.
The house, which has a Larchmont mailing address but is just outside that village in the town of Mamaroneck, is listed at $1.635 million. Records show Geithner and his wife, Carole Sonnenfeld Geithner, paid a little less than that when they bought it in 2004 _ $1.602 million.

After their agent's fee and land transfer taxes, the Geithners will probably clear less than what they paid, said real estate agent Debbie Meiliken of Coldwell Banker in Scarsdale, who is among the agents showing the house to potential buyer…

Let's place the BLAME exactly where it belongs ! The 'bailout' for AIG was mastermind by Goldmans former CEO

The 'emergency' of the Bush White House in October of 2008 was never an emergency at all. It was profound neglect of a burgeoning crisis that started long before Paulson 'shock and awed' the world into the biggest 'bailout' for Goldman Sachs. I knew there had to be something going on before the 'emergency.' Restructuring has to occur and the idea the USA can continue to print dollar bills forever is hideous.

M-LEC: Restructuring Not Bailout (click here)
by: Roger Ehrenberg October 22, 2007
...Now, the ultimate Wall Street player and insider, Henry M. Paulson Jr., the Treasury secretary, has bestirred himself to take serious notice of the credit problems faced by some very big lenders. He wants to create a bailout fund in which banks that still appear sound buy some of the debt of the troubled players like Citigroup....


Banks May Pool Billions to Avert Securities Sell-Off (click here)
By ERIC DASH
Published: October 14, 2007
...Citigroup, Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase, along with several other financial institutions, have been meeting to come up with a plan to create a fund that could prevent a sharp sell-off in securities owned by bank-affiliated investment vehicles. The meetings, which began three weeks ago, have been orchestrated by senior officials at the Treasury Department, and the discussions have intensified in the last few days....
...The effort to create a backup fund began about three weeks ago, when the Treasury secretary, Henry M. Paulson, called a meeting in Washington that included the chief executives of Citigroup, Bank of America, JPMorgan and other big banks. With Wall Street firms having almost no luck finding buyers for mortgage-backed securities and derivatives, Mr. Paulson wanted to see what could be done to relieve the bottleneck....

Basically, the American people were left out of the picture entirely. The only focus Paulson took was to buoy the financial markets no matter the cost. Bush/Paulson/Bernanke had plenty of time to bring hearings and call on Congress to restructure issues that would disaffect the financial sector and they did NOTHING. Never once did Hankie Paulson ever consider the contracture that would occur that would ruin the American economy that supported American labor. Never once did Paulson come forward to bring an agenda of structured 'recovery' to the people of the USA. He and bush simply 'let it ride' scared of the outcome in 2008 and hoping the 'crash' would not come before the Presidential elections.

The monies that were paid in executive compensation were simply a 'matter of fact' for any business sector. Do executives ever sabotage their employers to 'take secrets' into other venues for their own profit? Sure they do, ask Bill Gates. The 'compensation' of executives in financial institutions take many forms, it was unconscionable for Paulson to even consider eliminating 'bad decision' makers from any payroll. After all he and The Decider were of the same 'stock.'



Goldman's share of AIG bailout money draws fire (click title to entry - thank you)
Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:46am EDT
By Paritosh Bansal - Analysis
NEW YORK (Reuters) - American International Group funneled over $90 billion of taxpayer bailout funds to various U.S. and European banks, but the biggest beneficiary was politically connected Goldman Sachs Group Inc....

....$12.9 billion AIG paid to Goldman Sachs -- where then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson had previously worked as chief executive -- in the months after the insurer was rescued by the government last September.
Goldman, for its part, has insisted it did not need the bailout money because it was "always fully collateralized and hedged."...

...Asked why Goldman Sachs took $12.9 billion of taxpayer money if it was collateralized and hedged on its AIG positions, DuVally said it was because AIG was not allowed to fail, so Goldman did not get money from hedges that would have paid out if the insurer had collapsed. And, he said, under the terms of its contracts with AIG, Goldman was entitled to collateral....

Of course. Then the monies that went to Goldman Sachs they didn't need, right? So, why then weren't those monies returned to the USA Treasury and the people of the USA? Have an answer for that one?

If Paulson was sincerely concerned for the USA Treasury BEFORE placing importance on the 'bailout' of Goldman Sachs liabilities, the 'salary scale' to top executives of the 'toxic division' of AIG should have been included in the bailout he proposed. But, if that were to take place that would mean the government would actually have to 'lean' on AIG in a manner the Republican Neocons never approved of in the first place. If one recalls the first $350 billion was a free for all and STILL isn't accounted for! That was the Paulson/Bush solution.





...Goldman was not the only large bank with exposure to AIG. The list of counterparties that AIG disclosed on Sunday included others that got large sums. Goldman was followed by Societe Generale with $11.9 billion, Deutsche Bank with $11.8 billion and Barclays PLC with $8.5 billion.
Moreover, the AIG disclosures are still incomplete in that they do not include payments to the banks since December 31.


In the article below, it is clearly noted that Standard and Poor's down graded AIG on four different occassions because their financial 'risk' was increasing after it embarked on 'experimental' financial tools in their Financial Products Division. Did anyone ever ask why AIG should have received any funds to 'support' its operation past its failure based upon recognized and long standing reliable ratings such as the S&P? No. Paulson simply jumped into the mess with two feet when Goldman Sachs was sure their 'hedging' was the best in the business and should follow the same course as time would prove the performance of the new products would win out. Hankie Paulson continued his lust for his $14,000 DOW on a gamble that in time AIG's products would turn a huge profit, or better yet, the products the company developed could be sold at auction as the American People's frustration with 'promised' returns to pay back the bailout failed.


Ratings Agency: We Started Downgrading AIG In 2005 (click here)
11:26 A.M.: UPDATED:
The Standard & Poor's executive in charge of issuing credit ratings on AIG started downgrading the insurance giant in 2005, he testified moments ago before a meeting of a subcommittee of the House Financial Services committee.
Rodney Clark, the managing director of S&P's ratings group, said that his company downgraded AIG four times since 2005 because of perceived trouble brewing with the credit default swaps sold by AIG's Financial Products division, which would likely have brought down the company had it not been for $173 billion in government bailout money.
AIG carried an AAA rating from S&P for many years, Clark said, but if the insurance giant were not propped up by the government right now, it would have a BB- rating, or junk....






When Paulson mastermind this entire 'bailout' for the financial sector before he was evicted from office, he stated the banks that would be saved would 'in a short period' of time return the funds to the American treasury. Never in the history of this country was $700 BILLION US ever legislated as a method to ? save ? a private sector. Never. In a matter of months $700 billion (That is seven hundred thousand units of $1,000,000 in funds) was to saturate the global markets and correct all the ills of the USA economy. Hasn't done it yet. But, of course, all those analysts will tell anyone, "But, but, but, the labor market is the last place you'll see a recovery."


In the article below it reminds the American people that there IS a way to save jobs and rebuild our economy that was ravaged by Wall Street. We don't live in a perfect world, however there are nearly 90% of the jobs saved at Catepillar due to the Obama Economic Stimulus. But, of course, in the case of bailing out Wall Street we'd have to be patient and wait for our jobs to be regenerated. Jobs that would be restructured to eliminate unions and a living wage. I don't think so !


Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

The Very Hungry Caterpillar, Cont'd (click here)
March 17, 2009 7:03 PM

Caterpillar, Inc. today announced it intends to lay off 2,454 employees at five plants in three states -- including 911 employees at the plant in East Peoria, Ill., that President Obama visited in his push for Congress to pass the stimulus package.
As you may recall, on February 11, while campaigning in Virginia for his "Recovery and Reinvestment Act" to pass Congress, President Obama said that "Caterpillar, which manufactures machines used in this project has announced some 20,000 layoffs in the last few weeks. Today the chairman and CEO of Caterpillar said that if the American Recovery and Reinvestment plan passes, his company would be able to rehire some of those employees."
At the Caterpillar factory on February 12, President Obama said that Jim Owens, the CEO of Caterpillar, Inc., "said that if Congress passes our plan, this company will be able to rehire some of the folks who were just laid off."...

Protesters Greet Bush In Canada

If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen. It would be really interesting to actually have Bush criticize Obama. Like, what would say anyway?



A protester scuffles with police outside the venue where former U.S. President George W. Bush was speaking to an invited audience of Calgary businessmen on Tuesday, March 17, 2009. The event was Bush's first speaking engagement since leaving office in January. (AP Photo/Jeff McIntosh, The Canadian Press)




Bush says he won't criticize because Obama 'deserves my silence' (click here)
March 18, 2009
CALGARY, Alberta - Former president George W. Bush said yesterday that he won't criticize President Obama because Obama "deserves my silence," and said he plans to write a book about the 12 toughest decisions he made in office....