Inconsistent Leadership. The political right wing has never acknowledged the US Constitution as a benevolent document. They view it as a threat.

William Kristol, one of the founders and leaders in PNAC. (Source: Public domain)

June 3, 1997: PNAC Think Tank Issues 
Statement of Principles (click here)

PNAC (Project for a New American Century)

Statement of Principles (click here)

We aim to make the case and rally support 
for American global leadership.

As the 20th century draws to a close, the 
United States stands as the world's 
preeminent power. Havingled the West to 
victory in the Cold War, America faces an 

opportunity and a challenge:... 

...Cuts in foreign affairs and defense spending, inattention to the 
tools of statecraft, and inconstant leadership are making it 

increasingly difficult to sustain American influence around the world. 

And the promise of short-term commercial benefits threatens to 

override strategic considerations. As a consequence, we are

jeopardizing the nation's ability to meet present threats and to deal 

with potentially greater challenges thatlie ahead....

...Our aim is to remind Americans of these lessons and to draw 
their consequences for today. 

Here are four consequences: (There is that number four again. Just
thought I'd point that out.)

• We need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to 

carry out our global responsibilities today and modernize our armed 

forces for the future;

• We need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge 
 regimes hostile to our interests and values;

• We need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom 

abroad;

• We need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in 

preserving and extending an international order friendly to our 

security, our prosperity, and our principles

...Such a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity may not 

be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build 

on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our 
greatness in the next. 

Signators 

Elliott Abrams

Gary Bauer 

William J. Bennett 

Jeb Bush

Dick Cheney 

Eliot A. Cohen 

Midge Decter 

Paula Dobriansky 

Steve Forbes

Aaron Friedberg

Francis Fukuyama

Frank Gaffney

Fred C. Ikle

Donald Kagan

Zalmay Khalilzad

I. Lewis Libby 

Norman Podhoretz

Dan Quayle

Peter W. Rodman 

Stephen P. Rosen 

Henry S. Rowen

Donald Rumsfeld  

Vin Weber

George Weigel

Paul Wolfowitz

One of the first acts of the 2010 House was to weaken the federal government beyond the States Rights provision in the US Constitution.

Sunday, May 26, 2013

Sunday, May 26, 2013

...Back in 2010, (click here) after taking over the House of Representatives, the Tea Party faction of the GOP proposed a "states' rights" change in the Constitution. Sponsored by Utah's Rob Bishop, the proposal was called the Repeal Amendment. It was designed to give states the authority to veto federal laws and regulations. Under this proposed amendment, supporters aimed “to push back the federal government's encroachment on sovereign states rights." 

Any federal law, like healthcare, abortion or gun control laws and even civil rights legislation, would be up for a vote in state legislatures. The resolution read:

 

 “Any provision of law or regulation of the United States may be repealed by the several states, and such repeal shall be effective when the legislatures of two-thirds of the several states approve resolutions for this purpose that particularly describe the same provision or provisions of law or regulation to be repealed.”...

“Any provision of law or regulation of the United States may be repealed by the several states, and such repeal shall be effective when the legislatures of two-thirds of the several states approve resolutions for this purpose that particularly describe the same provision or provisions of law or regulation to be repealed.” - See more at: http://nomadicpolitics.blogspot.com/2013/05/how-alec-koch-brothers-and-tea-party.html#sthash.S4jD84wS.dpuf

ack in 2010, after taking over the House of Representatives, the Tea Party faction of the GOP proposed a "states' rights" change in the Constitution. Sponsored by Utah's Rob Bishop, the proposal was called the Repeal Amendment. It was designed to give states the authority to veto federal laws and regulations. Under this proposed amendment, supporters aimed “to push back the federal government's encroachment on sovereign states rights." 

Any federal law, like healthcare, abortion or gun control laws and even civil rights legislation, would be up for a vote in state legislatures. The resolution read:

- See more at: http://nomadicpolitics.blogspot.com/2013/05/how-alec-koch-brothers-and-tea-party.html#sthash.S4jD84wS.dpuf

The Kochs have been entangling federal government officals for a long time and using their money to support those willing to violate the US Constitution.

By: Rmuse

Wednesday, January, 26th, 2011, 10:00 am
...One of the first acts of the 112^th Congress (click here) was to read the entire Constitution aloud. The problem with the Constitution the Republicans read was that it omitted parts that did not fit into the narrative the conservatives are promoting; that is where part of the danger lies. The revisionist American history the Tea Party and Republicans are selling does not represent the Founders intent when they wrote the Constitution. Scalia and his Tea Party partner Justice Clarence Thomas, earlier this month challenged the scope of the Commerce Clause to set the stage for doing the Tea Party’s bidding and overturning the Affordable Health Care Act.

Thomas’s wife, Ginny, was the leader of a Tea Party lobbying group that benefited from the Citizen’s United decision that gave corporations “person” status allowing them to donate as much money to campaigns as they like. The decision guarantees that corporations will control the government, and based on the increased corporatism Republicans are promoting, Scalia, Thomas, and other conservatives on the high court achieved their goal. Justice Thomas is being accused of not reporting income his wife earned between 2003 and 2007 from the Heritage Foundation. Heritage is an ultra-conservative think-tank that controls Republican policy and is associated with the Koch Brothers and their Cato Institute. The Koch’s have financed Tea Party efforts at stopping health care reform and global climate change initiatives. The Koch brothers are also supporters of Scalia and Thomas’s reinterpretation of the Constitution, and they hosted a secretive gathering of elite conservative industrialists that both justices attended....

Think this is a joke? Think again.

Cheney was litigating Bush's Executive Orders in that the Vice President was more powerful and contained more power than the President. Richard Cheney has been dismantling ANY other power of the government while elevating his to supremacy.

If you think the Vice President's abuse of power is scary now, consider what might happen when he counts Electoral College votes in a divisive 2008 election.

Aziz Huq
June 26, 2007 

 If it weren't so frightening, the irony would be delicious: A Vice President who has done more than any other to push the envelope on executive privilege at the expense of the courts and Congress takes the position that his office has both legislative and executive functions so as to avoid accounting for the use of classified materials. 

Any veneer of intellectual legitimacy that executive power defenders have caked on their vision of a monarchical executive evaporates in the glare of this naked opportunism. And the scope and nature of today's constitutional crisis comes into clearer focus. 

The term "constitutional crisis" is much abused, invoked generally whenever Congress shows some life. Confrontations on war funding and Congressional subpoenas, to cite recent examples, are in fact as old as the Republic. They are but healthy sparks from a constitutional confrontation of "ambition against ambition," precisely as the Framers intended. 


But the true crisis is hidden in plain sight--the existence of an office in the Constitution--the Vice President's--with no real remit and no real limits, open to exploitation and abuse. 

Consider as symptom number one Cheney's claim to be neither lawmaker nor executive--and thus exempt from any scrutiny of his handling of classified documents. In 2003 President Bush signed an Executive Order 12958 requiring agencies and "any other entity" within the executive branch to report to a division of the National Archives on their classification and declassification activities. But since 2003 Cheney's office has pointed to his position as president of the Senate to justify a refusal to comply. In May 2006 a Cheney spokesperson told Mark Silva of the Chicago Tribune that the legal question had been "thoroughly reviewed." And that was the end of the matter. Only now has Representative Henry Waxman's House Oversight Committee begun to examine the Vice President's failure to comply....

Article V would be the law within the US Constitution that would carry out a Second Constitutional Congress.

It would be the same process as adding an Amendment to the USA Constitution.


Article V

The Congress, (click here) whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.

Scholars argue the very first Constitutional Convention sets precedent for the Second.

November 29, 2011
By Gregory Korte
USA Today

...And they're already halfway to their goal. (click here) At least 17 of the 34 states necessary have petitioned Congress for a convention to propose a balanced budget amendment. States that have done it this year include Alabama, Louisiana, North Dakota, Texas and Utah....

The argument goes like this, " The original 1787 Convention, itself, was the first precedent, since it had only been authorized to amend the original 1787 Convention had only been authorized to amend the Articles of Confederation and not to draw up an entirely original.

Eventually there would be a completely new US Constitution, however, scholars believe the precedent exists regardless of the folly it was.

The Continental Congress (click here) adopted the Articles of Confederation, the first constitution of the United States, on November 15, 1777. However, ratification of the Articles of Confederation by all thirteen states did not occur until March 1, 1781. The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments. The need for a stronger Federal government soon became apparent and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The present United States Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation on March 4, 1789.

As the First President of the USA, the late President George Washington felt a great responsibility to address uncertainty.

In his farewell address, President George Washington said: (click here)

If in the opinion of the People the distribution or modification of the Constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation [to seize and hold (as office, place, or powers) ]; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit which the use can at any time yield.

Do the Republicans have the appetite to destroy the country and start over again?

Monday, December 12, 2011

By James O'Toole, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

 

The Constitution of the United States (click here) is studied throughout the world as a model blueprint for governing a free people, its framers revered for achieving what Catherine Drinker Bowen famously labeled the "Miracle at Philadelphia."

But concern over a seemingly dysfunctional climate in Washington and issues ranging from the national debt to the overwhelming influence of money in politics have spawned calls for fundamental change in the document that guides the nation's government. From the left and the right, a small but seemingly growing cadre of scholars and activists is calling for a new constitutional convention to respond to the changes and excesses of current politics.

Such a convention is envisioned in the text of the founding 1787 document but has never been employed. The amendments that, among other things, ended slavery, enfranchised women and established, then ended, Prohibition were adopted through two-thirds votes in Congress and ratified by three-quarters of the states. Article V of the Constitution, however, in the same section that set up that procedure, set forth the legal possibility for the legislatures of two-thirds of the states to instruct Congress to call a constitutional convention, a mechanism, in the view of some government critics, whose time has come....

It's Sunday Night

The Republicans want to reverse the 2012 election in 2014.

Take your pick, one will be President of the USA by April 15, 2015.

One of the first acts of the majority Republican House and Senate will be to impeach President Obama. They don't care about the facts, they only care about the votes. The Chief Justice will proceed over a 'meeting' and not a hearing. He'll quantify procedure so it looks legit but will not mitigate facts. Once President Obama is out of the way, President Biden will begin his two years in office. He will remain there until the US House and Senate does the same thing to President Biden as they did with Obama and Boehner is now President Boehner. If they don't want Boehner they will replace him before they impeach President Obama. It will be a bloodless coup and the USA will be in political turmoil for two years with potential to enter war before 2016.

A new political consulting firm (click here) with deep ties to the Koch brothers has quietly set up shop in Arlington, Virginia. Its mission: to prevent future Todd Akins and Richard Mourdocks from tanking the Republican Party's electoral prospects. The firm, named Aegis Strategic, is run by a former top executive at Charles and David Koch's flagship advocacy group, Americans for Prosperity, and it was founded with the blessing of the brothers' political advisers, three Republican operatives tell Mother Jones.

The defacto president of the USA after the November elections of 2014 will be The Koch Brothers.

All the frustrated billionaires that haven't oppressed the Middle Class as much as they want to. They could not relate to the importance of the Middle Class in any country no matter how they tried.

Oh. Yeah. Ahhhh. Canada and possibly Mexico need to be prepared for American refugees. Seriously. Does anyone realize how hate filled these people are? 

Eventually, the people will realize what has been done to them and their only recourse is to stop paying taxes (and there are methods to do that), take them money and leave the country in whatever method they decide. 

If Nevada is a reflection of the political movement of these characters, the country is in sincere trouble and the people have a right to know their well being is in danger and they need to act on that knowledge. 

People like David and what's his name Koch have been excoriating people out of wealth for decades. They are among the most immoral men this world has ever witnessed. They, along with the Waltons, the most maniacal people ever to this Earth. Walmart is everywhere in the world. Where have they relieved suffering and raised people out of poverty? When one thinks of these people one has to view them in their entirety, not just the suit they wear on Sunday or at Shabbat.

Speaking of oppression and murder, there are still deaths occurring in Albuquerque.

Hey! It is the same damn department murdering citizens.

By RUSSELL CONTRERAS  Associated Press
May 04, 2014 - 1:55 am EDT

ALBUQUERQUE, New Mexico — Albuquerque police (click here) said a man died Saturday after an officer fired shots at him during a long SWAT standoff.
The shooting comes with police facing pending U.S. Justice Department reforms over excessive force.
Deputy Chief Eric Garcia told reporters that the man died at an Albuquerque home after the man walked out of the home and fired handguns. "At 6:16 p.m. the suspect exited the house and fired shots from two handguns. An APD officer discharged his weapon at that time. The subject is deceased," Garcia said.
He did not say if the man died from gunshot wounds.
Authorities did not release any information on the suspect nor the name of the officer who fired.

According to police, the man barricaded himself inside his house...

I would, too.

...following a domestic dispute. Authorities said the man contacted local media outlets...

I would, too.

...during the nearly eight-hour standoff and police asked reporters not to take the man's calls...

Really!

...over fears the interaction may interfere with negotiations for him to surrender....

LIARS!

We know what happens when citizens surrender to Albequerque's Swat Team. We've seen it before. 

Eden needs to be fired! 

NOW! 

The Swat Team disbanded.

NOW! 

The members of the Swat Team fired! 

NOW!

The militias are being replaced by the current government in Ukraine. That is a good thing.

Why is that a good thing? Because there is a central authority that can enact a peace within the country through strength. When militias exist there is no determining the outcome of the guns.

What was seen by Americans in Nevada with actions of a militia. The escalation to the point of threatening the government's employees was anarchy. There was no controlling it. It was every man for himself or herself. If an innocent citizen got in the way of the militias aggression it would be collateral damage for the sake of the ideology.

That has been occurring across Ukraine with new flash points as others are being reclaimed by the central government. There were schools closed and people threatened to achieve a desired behavior, journalists kidnapped and threatened with their lives. The militias were instituted by the former President Yanukovych in cooperation with oligarchs to enforce a certain political outcome under the thumb of oppression.

Ukrainian soldiers take part in a training exercise at a military base in Donetsk on Saturday, March 2

By Tim Lister, CNN

April 24, 2014

Updated 0748 GMT (1548 HKT)

...Just one month (click here) before the Ukrainian presidential election, constitutional reforms that might mollify the pro-Russian protesters are still being thrashed out. 

The Geneva agreement called on the protesters to relinquish the buildings they hold and promised amnesty for those who do. But the immediate answer from behind the barricades was defiant.

As one of the leaders of the occupation in Donetsk put it to CNN, "We have not come this far just to leave without our demands being met. It is the Kiev government that is illegitimate. They have to give up the buildings they have seized." There was a similar response from protest leaders in the southern city of Mariupol....

It is snowing at the 45 th parrallel and the farmers haven't been out on their fields yet.

UNISYS Infrared Midwest Satellite (click here for 12 hour loop)
May 4, 2014
10:31:47z

Sunday, May 4, 2014 @ 7:21 AM

Latitude 44.9767° N

Longitude 85.6506° W

Large, fluffy snow flakes

Wind 3 mph

35F 

Humidity 94%

Prediction states rain. It isn't rain.

Yesterday was the first day the bay received waves.

UNISYS Water Vapor North and West Hemisphere Satellite (click here for 12 hour loop - thank you)
May 4, 2014
1030.18z

intellicast North Pole Satellite
May 4, 2014
0600 gmt

Arctic sea ice (click here) reached its annual maximum extent on March 21, after a brief surge in extent mid-month. Overall the 2014 Arctic maximum was the fifth lowest in the 1978 to 2014 record. 

The sea ice is greater in Antarctica because of the ice fields melting on the continent. There is more cold entering the circumpolar circulation. We have witnessed enormous shelf collapse and icebergs this year.

Antarctic sea ice reached its annual minimum on February 23, and was the fourth highest Antarctic minimum in the satellite record. While this continues a strong pattern of greater-than-average sea ice extent in Antarctica for the past two years, Antarctic sea ice remains more variable year-to-year than the Arctic.

Warmer ocean circulation.

Arctic sea ice extent for March 2014 averaged 14.80 million square kilometers (5.70 million square miles). This is 730,000 square kilometers (282,000 square miles) below the 1981 to 2010 average extent, and 330,000 square kilometers (127,000 square miles) above the record March monthly low, which happened in 2006. Extent remains slightly below average in the Barents Sea and the Sea of Okhotsk, but is at near-average levels elsewhere.

Arctic Ocean Sea Ice Graph Average from 1979-2000

The average up to this point was very predictable. It didn't meander to far from the same averge, ie: the gray areas.

 
This is the same graph as above, but, with the average of 2001 added to it. Consistent, right?

This is the same graph as above without 2001, but, with the average of 2002. It's different, isn't it? The average in 2002 wanders outside 'the norm' that has been consistent from 1979-2001. What happened? Does anyone remember what happened? I do.

One October 4, 2002 the first two vortexes appeared in the northern hemisphere with one in the North Atlantic and one in the North Pacific. Simultaneously, in Antarctica an alert was published that "C Zero" had reversed it's flow. C Zero was an ice river in Antarctica. At the time the scientists stated they were uncertain what occurred simply because they hadn't analyzed data yet. But, what I recorded in my notes for that day was that C Zero was no longer completely ice and was floating on melt water (similar to the Greenland Icesheet) and was now flowing toward the circumpolar circulation rather than continually expanding in ice content. 

When the vortexes showed up and there were only two at the time (eventually there would be a maximum of seven major vortexes in the northern hemisphere over time) the equation of the climate crisis changed. We were no longer looking at a linear equation, it was now exponential which means the crisis was not contracting into a tighter and tighter time frame. The estimations went from 100 years to 50 years and today it's even shorter. 

This is the graph of the Arctic Ocean sea ice extent from the years 1981 - 2010 with the 2002 average. The 2002 line is no longer outside the 'normal', is it? As a matter of fact it is well within that average. What happened?

This is a comparison of the Arctic Ocean sea ice extent of both charts, 1979-2000 and 1981-2010 plus 2002. What happened to the solidly average 'normal' sea ice extent in just a few year? 

The dynamics of Earth's troposphere changed. It reached a tipping point. The Arctic Ocean average sea ice extent was no longer consistent and was exhibiting qualities never witnessed before. It was becoming far less predictable and this was validated by countries like Iceland which in 2003 was reporting there was open water passage across the Arctic Ocean/Arctic Sea.

Now, the Polar Vortex which provided consistent Arctic Ocean sea ice extent averages for historic consistency is now unhinged.

The snow at the 45th parrallel at Latitude 44.9767° N and Longitude 85.6506° W changed from large, fluffy windless snow to very light flurries without wind at 8:05AM EST and has now stopped as of 8:07AM EST. It isn't as though it still isn't precipitating, but, it is that the precipitation isn't reaching the ground because the sun's light and infrared heat from Earth is now greater.

Congratulations, Laurel.

Jamil Dakwar, director of the ACLU Human Rights Program, Laurel Krause of KSTT with #Allison at the United Nations, Palais des Nations, March 12, 2014 — with Laurel Krause.

Kent State Made It to the United Nations in Geneva for the US 4th Periodic Human Rights Review, March 10-14, 2014

PLEASE PERUSE our Kent State Truth Tribunal news coverage from our recent #KentState campaign at the UN Human Rights Committee:

The Kent State Truth Tribunal addresses the UN Human Rights Committee, 3/13/14 ~ http://bit.ly/1dgliTW...See More

The Right to Protest Peacefully is an Essential Enabler of Other Rights and Freedoms (click here)

Head of the U.S. Delegation and Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs, Paula Schriefer

Human Rights Council 25th Session - Geneva, Switzerland
2014-03-28
Thank you, Mr. President
 
United States strongly supports this resolution L. 20 on peaceful protests. We will vote yes on the resolution and will vote no on the amendments. We ask others to join us in this vote.

As the lead sponsor of the annual resolution on Freedom of Association and Assembly, which is a consensus resolution, we view the ability to protest peacefully as an essential enabler of other rights and freedoms. Peaceful protests are often an important form of political expression – a form which is also sometimes politically divisive.

The amendments proposed today would restrict the ability to make such political expression and could have serious negative consequences for the enjoyment of these fundamental freedoms.

For example, the most insidious of the proposed amendments is L 50, which would restrict the ability of those to conduct peaceful protests for reasons of National Security.

National security is too often interpreted overly broadly and is used as a pretext to restrict protests which are essentially political in nature. In my own country, the demonstrations for racial equality led by Martin Luther King Jr. were wrongly restricted by security officials using such pretexts.
Other great leaders of protest marches – including Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Gandhi– faced restriction of their peaceful protests for similar reasons. We find such restrictions incompatible with support for freedom of assembly, freedom of expression and other rights protected by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Universal Declaration.

As a result, the United States will vote against these amendments and in favor of the resolution on peaceful protests. We urge others to join us.
- Cross posted from the U.S. Mission to Geneva

Sisters matter.

I'll tell you what is going to happen in Egypt.

General what's his name becomes president and in order to please Russia he will either jail or execute the 1200+ people the courts have charged with murder. 

At that point Egypt and Russia will have created over 1200 martyrs. The General will expect that to be a lesson to the rest of the country and order will return as it was under Mubarak. 

Does anyone think that is what is going to happen besides the General? 

One of the martyrs is the woman that text from Tahrir Square and brought the nation to an alertness they have never had before. She is being charged with murder because she didn't stop texting when the Murbarak police told her to stop texting.

One might ask why she had a cell phone in the first place if the Murbarak police didn't want citizens texting 'bad things' about the leadership when the average Egyptian lives on about $261.00 US per month. Approximately $9.00 US per day.

One might ask why cell phones at all in Egypt?

I have a theory.

Some million-billionaire decided there was more money to be made and with complete cooperation by the USA and Egyptian government the technology was brought to the Egyptian people. 

Guess where the data is stored? 

So, while a million-billionaire made tons of money the CIA ran psyops while the NSA stored all that data on a computer in some large complex somewhere in the USA.

The woman that first text her disgust with her government is now considered a terrorist and the NSA has the entire data from Egypt to prove it. 

This entire 'Family of Nations' is bullshit. It is complete and utter fucking bullshit.

It is not our finger to point.

West reluctant to point finger at nationalist radicals in Ukraine crisis (click here)

Published time: May 03, 2014

Russia is struck by the complacence of the West following violence by pro-Kiev radicals in Odessa, the Russian Ambassador to the UN has said. While the West has condemned the unrest, it has stopped short of pointing the finger at its culprits. 

Following an emergency meeting with the UN Security Council on Friday night in connection with the fire at Odessa’s Trade Unions House that killed 39 people, Ambassador Vitaly Churkin spoke out against Western support of radical elements in Ukraine....

I am sure the Ukrainian government is investigating all the problems along the Russian border of Eastern Ukraine and will take measures to render justice. Here is a word for you. Russia is being MEDDLESOME in Ukraine's internal affairs. Russia might want to ask it's diplomatic consulate to establish relations with Ukraine in order to facilitate trade though. 

When a major power enters the domestic affairs of a nation the odds are stacked in the favor of a certain outcome. I am sure Russia understands completely that it is being meddlesome and exactly how and why. Russia's sovereign purpose should not be visiting any other nation. That is called expansionism and never results in a good outcome for the people. 

Fact. 

Nabil Fahmy appeared on Charlie Rose.

Charlie Rose (click here)

I have only heard about the first 15 minutes with this former Egyptian Ambassador to the U.S. and I wasn't impressed with him. He seems to say, the Egyptian government is attempting to control and undo everything that has transpired with the Arab Spring. Perhaps as I hear the entire interview my opinion will change.

The Arab Spring can't be reversed. The people are in transition as is Mr. Fahmy who can't come to grips with the fact, this is what happens when a long term dictator is removed from power and there are few good alternatives prepared to lead. That is why when these uprisings occur a military lead will rise to the top of the country. The military has the means to intimidate and control so they take over.  

AUSTIN, Texas, April 2, 2012 – Ambassador at Large (click here) at the Egyptian Foreign Ministry and former Egyptian Ambassador to the United States Nabil Fahmy will share his unique insights into the global implications of the Arab Spring in a talk titled “The Arab Revolutions” on Monday, April 9, at 5:30 p.m. at the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum. Fahmy will cover many aspects of the various uprisings that have taken place in the Middle East and Northern Africa over the last year, focusing on the upcoming presidential elections in Egypt, prospects for a cease-fire in Syria, and signs that the Syrian revolution could be spilling over into neighboring Lebanon....

He has come to ask the Great White Man for money. He's obviously gotten his fair share of money from the Great Russian White Man.

It is amazing to listen to a leader come forward to ask for money for military prowess that will be exerted on the helpless civilians to establish ORDER. But, they never admit to have ORDER according to the Great White Man Standard they have already sold their sovereignty. But, that is okay. As long as the leaders can maintain power and control at any cost they don't mind selling their sovereignty to The Great White Man.  

Mr. Nabil, of all people, understands that selling Egypt's sovereignty to the Great White Man was the problem in the first place. What ever makes him think it is okay to make the same mistake all over again? Too many Presidents in a short period of time? Welcome to the new Egypt as it finds a path THE PEOPLE want without the help of The Great White Man. 

Now, while Mr. Nabil describes so compassionately the POLITICAL GROWTH of the Egyptian people I find myself asking, "Who is this man and what face is he really?" My first answer is, Mubarak. My second answer is Bush. My third Putin. So when I hear him speak Mr. Nabil has a multiple personality disorder rather than ADVOCATING for the sincere government the Egyptian people want. See, money comes with a price and Mr. Nabil believes if the Egyptian leadership can only once again PLEASE the Great White Men on Earth it will all be wonderful and endearing and the world will be the way it is suppose to be.

That brings me to the question, does Mr. Nabil actually want to lead The Tri-Lateral Commission and be a part of "The Family of Nations?" A family The Great White Man approves of and will christen with all the military power that serves The Great White Man well in his accumulation of wealth and more power.

See, Mr. Nabil hasn't come to terms with the fact Americans don't want another 911 because The Great White Man is in control of the oppression of the people of the world again. 

Mr. Nabil equates money with power and the more money he gets from The Great White Man he will seek to please that source of money at any cost to the people of his country. No, thank you, Mr. Nabil. I hope the elections in Egypt result in someone who sincerely loves the people of Egypt and not the control of them, their sovereignty and the control of the money control that power will bring. Now, maybe Moscow wants a 911 for the sake of the Putin agenda, but, I don't.

Russia is welcome to dump all the worthless Rubles it wants into Egypt. It is welcome to exert Moscow sovereignty over Egypt all it wants and oppress the people. Then and only then will Moscow realize how completely idiotic the Putin agenda is. The people of the USA don't want control of Egypt, we want them to be free. 

27 April 2014
TEHRAN – The moderate leadership (click here) of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani has offered the West an opportunity that must not be missed, Mohamed ElBaradei, the former director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and a Nobel Peace laureate, wrote in a recent article.

 

In the article entitled “The politician who reached out to the West” that was published on the website of Time magazine on Wednesday, ElBaradei placed Rouhani on his list of the world’s 100 most influential people in 2014....