Monday, June 24, 2013

They'll love her in Beijing.

I am surprised Smithfield Foods dropped Paula Deen. Besides knowing she was a Southern Chief with a long history in that culture, I would think she would be a beacon of interest in China.

June 24, 2013
NEW YORK (AP) — Paula Deen (click here) lost another part of her empire on Monday: Smithfield Foods said it was dropping her as a spokeswoman.
The announcement came days after the Food Network said it would not renew the celebrity cook's contract in the wake of revelations that she used racial slurs in the past.

Smithfield sold Paula Deen-branded hams in addition to using her as a spokeswoman. In a statement, the company said it "condemns the use of offensive and discriminatory language and behavior of any kind. Therefore, we are terminating our partnership with Paula Deen."

QVC also said it was reviewing its deal with Paula Deen Enterprises to sell the star's cookbooks and cookware....

When it comes to the Martin Zimmerman case, is attitude due to gun culture a role in violence?

There were opening remarks by the lawyers today. The prosecution is pointing to the facts that is the basis of the charge of Second Degree Murder.

Second Degree Murder upholds the fact the death was a one way street and there was no way out. In other words, no matter how Mr. Martin was seeking to avoid or prevent any confrontation that would lead to his death, it was inevitable. 

Some of the controversy to the State's case is the idea this was manslaughter. Manslaughter is very different than Second Degree Murder. Manslaughter is more the opportunity of the circumstances that caused the death of a person. In this case the State has the burden of proving there was no way out for Mr. Martin.

The odds are in the State's favor. I don't think the tape about the voice crying out for help has much to do with this, except, it proves the dramatic struggle before the death of Mr. Martin. I don't care if the voice is that of Mr. Zimmerman, it is the struggle that carries the most brevity. 

If the State is correct, as I believe they are, no matter how well prepared Mr. Martin was to defend himself in a good fight, the odds were in this case, no matter how well he defended himself he wasn't going to make it out alive. 

Mr. Zimmerman took his responsibility as a neighborhood watchman with brevity. The defense is stating Mr. Zimmerman was compelled in his actions by that responsibility. It was a one way outcome for Mr. Martin. This case seems open and shut to me, but, it is the jury that has to determine the outcome and not me. Mr. Zimmerman has a jury of his peers.

This is corruption at the federal level.

June 24, 2013
By Greg Stohr

...The court (click here) in the earlier case said those suits are “pre-empted” because federal law requires generic-drug companies to copy the packaging inserts used by brand-name manufacturers. The court said it would be impossible for drug companies to comply with both federal labeling requirements and state-imposed duties to supply even stronger warnings.

Absolutely not. Generic drugs have similar but not the same formulation as drugs produced under trade names. The federal law has to change to demand the formation by generic manufacturers be determined and published with the drugs they sell. 

This case should have been the impetus to that change, but, instead the Supreme Court decided life and limb of the American people are marginally better for generic drugs to be as cheap as possible including cutting corners on safety.

No one using generics expects to put their lives on the line for formulations UNKNOWN to the consumer.

This decision basically states the lower cost of drugs has greater benefit than the side effects of not knowing the formations of the generic. It is gambling again with the health of the American people. 

This is not that expensive. Independent labs can determine the formulations of the drugs and printers will be more than happy to typeset the information. The inserts are being printed anyway. Generics should also have quality control. They may not need the intense quality control of trade named drugs, but, quality control should exist. That isn't that expensive either. It means hiring one person per shift to collect the 'batch' sample and send it to an independent lab. As soon as a new batch is started then the process has to be repeated. These costs are very marginal in assurance to the American consumer. 

Physicians can prescribe the medications with greater confidence if these measures are accomplished. 

Crime reporting is inconsistent which reflects gun statistics as well.

I think it was Slate that had the daily tally of gun crime based in news reports. That is probably a better indicator at this point. The Martin-Zimmerman case is a gun case, too.

The illustration below is the Slate page (click here).

Denver is claiming a software problem. If that is the case the trouble could be systemic. It is not unusual for police departments nationwide to purchase and use the same computer software. I am wondering if this effects Background Checks. It has to effect the information police have in doing their jobs. 

According to the statistics as Slate the body count since Newtown is 5331. This sort of problem will be ongoing. The organizations such as Sandy Hook Promise and Americans for Responsible Solutions and the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence are going to be needed to police this type of problem. As a matter of fact these organization can even develop and recommend APPS and programs for such issues. 

There can easily be a business spin off to the organizations to promote excellence in the integrity of the reporting and background check system. This isn't going to end with legislation, this is a longed lived problem that will require dedicated people and monies to bring justice and consistency. There needs to be a separate organization aside from the work of the non-profits to coordinate efforts to diminish violence and find methods and practices that work. Yes, they can be profitable and employee people. It might be a good idea for these organizations to bring expertise together in a single company that can then be promoted.

By Sadie Gurman
June 24, 2013  
...Hundreds of crimes (click here) in Denver were not included in FBI statistics last year largely because of officer error and software glitches, Denver Police Department officials acknowledged.
As police dig further into how those mistakes happened, high on their list of unanswered questions is why 25 percent of the homicides in 2012 are not reflected in the FBI's Uniform Crime Report, which experts say is an important tool in examining overall crime trends nationally.


In anticipation of the Supreme Court decision on Pre-clearance, President Obama has nominated members to Federal Elections Commission.

June 24, 2013
By a MetNews Staff Writer 

...The FEC (click here) is a six-member body, divided equally between Democrats and Republicans, that enforces the Federal Election Campaigns Act. One seat is currently vacant, and five members are holding over after their terms have expired.

Ravel, 63, has headed the FPPC, which enforces the state’s campaign finance laws, since 2011. She served from 2009 to 2011 as deputy assistant U.S. attorney general, overseeing tort and consumer litigation in the Civil Division of the Department of Justice. 

Before joining the DOJ, she spent 33 years in the Santa Clara County Counsel’s Office, the last 11 as county counsel. 

She was a member of the Judicial Council of California from 2002 to 2005, and served one full term plus two short appointed stints on the Board of Governors, in addition to her service on the JNE commission....

I think we are on a slippery slope.

June 24, 2013
By Saumya Vaishampayan

...“I think the dollar is getting pushed round based on what fixed income and equities are doing,” he said....

The more there is investment in USA Treasuries the more attractive they become and vise versa with the Yen.

...The 10-year Japanese government bond yield was up 1 basis point to 0.878% in recent trade, according to FactSet data. The 10-year Treasury was up 6 basis points recently to 2.6%. U.S. stocks fell on Monday...

The USA economy is the strongest of all other nations. The bond yields are most secure. Our allies need to get their economies chugging along to bring about stability.

...The euro   — which makes up more than half of the comparative basket used for the ICE dollar index by weighting — fell to $1.3097, down from $1.3138 late Friday.

The British pound slipped to $1.5417 from $1.5428. The U.S. dollar rose against the Canadian dollar   to C$1.0523, up from C$1.0456.

But the Australian dollar  edged higher to 92.48 U.S. cents from 92.45 U.S. cents late Friday....

It would help all economies if allies were on the same page.

By Danielle Douglas 
Japan’s Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ (click here) agreed to pay $250 million to settle New York state charges that it illegally funneled billions of dollars to countries that are under U.S. sanctions, including Iran, Sudan and Burma.

The settlement is part of a larger effort by government regulators to clamp down on funding for countries under sanction, drug traffickers and terrorists. International banks, including HSBC and Standard Chartered, have in recent years faced stiff penalties for flouting U.S. laws. Critics, how­ever, question whether fines are enough to deter this behavior....

As long as Wall Street is exempt for underming USA national security this will continue!

They betray the American people. They threaten our national security and this is the outcome. It is no different than the banks and executives that never find a pathway to prison for their exploitative of Americans, their economy and treasury. Same thing. Blame the homeowners, blame the debtors while everyone receives their bonuses compliments of a bailout.

Here are the men that should be on the run, but, they aren't!

Carlyle Group, led by Daniel D'Aniello, left, David Rubenstein and William Conway Jr., remains in investors' good graces despite problems with some of Fund V's holdings.

Despite NSA spying uproar, investors are loyal to Carlyle (click here)
Troubles with Carlyle's fifth fund have not deterred fundraising for fund six 

By Arleen Jacobius
June 24, 2013 

Carlyle Group's fifth buyout fund is again under attack, this time following the stunning revelation that Edward J. Snowden, a former employee of Carlyle portfolio company Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., leaked National Security Agency documents showing the NSA is spying on American citizens...

At least the Itnaians didn't jail the girl as a traitor.

Former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi's latest legal troubles centered on exotic dancer Karima el Mahroug.
 
June 23, 2013
 
A panel of judges (click here) Monday sentenced former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to seven years in prison for having sex with an underage prostitute and abusing power.
The high-profile case centered on an exotic dancer nicknamed "Ruby the heart-stealer."
Judges also barred the flamboyant former prime minister from holding public office.
His attorney told reporters he planned to appeal the conviction. He said he was not surprised by the verdict, because Berlusconi had not gotten a fair trial.
Prosecutors had argued that Berlusconi had sex 13 times with underage dancer Karima el Mahroug and abused his position when he intervened in May 2010 to get her released from jail, where she was being held on charges of theft....
The only people that should be losing patience are the American People.

Mr. Snowden is NOT the problem. This is outrageous. Carlyle is the issue and always has been the issue and for the damage THEY have done to the USA national security is where the responsibility.

Mr. Snowden is being scapegoated for the benefits of Wall Street. This is an outrage!

The 30-year-old NSA leaker (click here) (Whistle Blower) manages to make Washington seem stumped as he slips out of Hong Kong and lands in Russia, apparently planning to end up in Ecuador.

All the rantings by the Obama Administration at this point is nothing more than mind speak. Where are the officers of Carlyle being held? Prison or the Gulf Club?

All the corporate leaders have the right idea then. They can use the American military for their own purposes and priorities. Snowden is NOT the problem, albeit, the individual exposing the problem. The problem is the very loose policies of the American government. Where is the evidence all that is being changed and the American people are actually important to their government! 

June 24, 2013

Edward Snowden, a former US intelligence contractor wanted by the United States for revealing a highly classified surveillance program that allegedly monitored millions of Americans, has eluded a pack of journalists at a Moscow airport, and officials from Russia as well as Ecuador, where he has requested asylum, say they do not know where he is.

While Snowden had checked in for a flight to Havana at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo Airport on Monday, he apparently did not make it aboard the plane, which had been sold out and was packed with journalists. There is no direct flight from Moscow to anywhere in Ecuador.

Meanwhile, the Ecuadorian foreign minister said Monday that he was unaware of the whistleblower’s whereabouts....

As long as this scapegoating continues and individuals are viewed as the enemy and not the policies and practices of the USA government this will not end. There are a million Mr. Snowdens and to believe jailing him or worse is the only answer to USA national security is pure propaganda!

I want the officers of Carlyle held responsible for this. I am confident their travel visas haven't been revoked, now have they? 

The flight plans were a ruse you jackasses! 

"Good Night, Moon"

Waning Gibbous

99.4% Full

15.5 day old moon

Close enough for me to call it a full moon.









Time-lapse of the Supermoon rising over the New York City skyline
This weekend marks the largest full moon of the year. The "supermoon" will be at its closest point to Earth, appearing 12 percent larger in the sky. 
(Video by John O'Boyle/The Star-Ledger)

Sunday, June 23, 2013

This is the United States of America. Civilized. First World. The Individual has rights.

Pregnancy is not a difficult discussion to have. Pregnancy in the First World means it is a mature decision. Just that simple. That decision is between a woman and her physician. If she wants to include her spouse, significant other, boyfriend or sperm donor in the decision that is up to her, but, in all honesty this is no place for government.

Raising children in the USA is suppose to be conducted by adults not children nearly not old enough to be babysitters.

When a child becomes pregnant for whatever reason she does that should never impact her life so profoundly it will alter her 'success path.' This is the year 2013, not 1913. Those decisions are very simple these days.

Post Partum Depression is not a joke. Now, be 14 years old and suffer through it while you mother is yelling at you to change the baby's diaper. That is a completely hideous scenario and it is profound child abuse. 

Post Partum Depression can lead to psychosis due to hormonal imbalances. There are studies existing that prove it. The usual scenario that is classic was seen in Texas with a woman of many children, spending most of her childbearing years in poverty and her last child was a girl. Classic. Starting a fourteen year old girl down that path is a societal illness, not a point of pride. Punitively telling her to raise a baby is outrageous.

Has anyone ever done a study on these girls and how their lives transpire? Do they ever marry? Do their children grow up without stigma? What happens to these children?

Bioethicists will state the fetus feels pain at a certain point, hence the valid reason to outlaw abortion. Abortion is a surgical procedure that usually involves anesthetics of one kind or another. That may sound cruel and cold, but, women are alive and fetus are not. 

If a fetus can be saved and provided for adoption, then I am all for it. However, there is STILL the issue of consent by the parents. At that point if the fetus is viable and alive and the parents want the child regardless of the intended abortion, they have the right to do so. This is not a harvesting procedure.

A woman's life comes before that of a fetus. There is no black and white here. The spectrum of "Mother and Baby" is infinite and every case unique. That is why there needs to be privacy between a woman and her physician. 

Let's not make this more than it is. It does not have a place in politics. Government does not have a place in this decision. This does not include criminal content such as the horrors of Gosnell. Crime is not abortion even though there are those that would like it to be so.

A woman has a right to her body. She has a right to decide about pregnancy. She has a right to prevent and abort pregnancy. There is nothing difficult here. 

Planned Parenthood has been a relief for women. Their services are vital, they add to quality of life and they uphold the dignity of women of all ages.

It is time to put this to bed. Pregnancy is serious business. It takes a mature woman to consent to it and provide a place for a child in her life, all her life.

Unless the USA is going to raise the children of women denied abortions, then they need to get out of their uterus.

Women trapped in unwanted pregnancy carry a burden more than a joy.

May 8, 2013

...Dr Rebecca Mercier, (click here) from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of North Carolina and co-author of the research said that unintended pregnancy carried to term may have a long term effect on women.

She said that healthcare professionals should therefore consider asking about pregnancy at early antepartum visits to screen for unintended pregnancy as women who report that their pregnancy was unintended or unwanted may benefit from earlier or more targeted screening both during and following pregnancy. The study has been published in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. (ANI). 

Young women are worried about boyfriends and not babies. Young minds and hearts need the tools to make it to their adult years before pregnancy.




May 23, 2013
By Simone De Alba
...They give women a reality check: (click here) having a baby isn't meant to be fashionable, it's hard work that demands resources like emotional support, money, and time. One of their main prevention tools is having women talk with young parents.
Emerson said, "That's what really is getting the word out, our young parents saying, "Hey, yes, I'm doing it and I'm being very responsible but I really could have done this easier if I hadn't."
Although prevention is a priority, unexpected pregnancies still take place. Under that circumstance many young women opt for adoption....

Casey was never a clear majority.

Judging from (click here) its unexpected jump into the most-read list, this graph showing the breakdown of care provided by Planned Parenthood’s health centers is proving useful to people. So here it is again, lifted from April. Note the light blue slice, which suggests that cancer screenings account for approximately one-sixth of Planned Parenthood’s activities.

Telling a teenage girl she has no options is emotional abuse and needs to be viewed in that light.

Child Maltreatment 2011 (click here)

Any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse or exploitation; or an act or failure to act, which presents an imminent risk of serious harm.

Teens must be given the opportunity to carry through with an abortion without guilt and with their self-esteem intact. 

The Casey decision is wrong. A teen should be required to have privacy in making decisions about contraception and pregnancy.

They must be educated to their options in preventing pregnancy and have free and open access to contraception if that is their plight.

Not all young women grow up in households prepared to educate them about sex or willing to teach them about sex. The harm comes when a teen is subjected to term pregnancies by obligation of a parent's prejudice.

A child giving birth to a child is dangerous business. Doctors are qualified to help and if sought by a teen, they should.

Pregnancy is a mature decision for people with resources. Girls are not mature nor have the resources to be a parent. It is emotional abuse plain and simple. 

March 10, 1991
And she was pregnant.
For months, she ignored the missed periods; her experience with menstruation had been brief, after all. She ignored the nausea and swollen stomach.
"It was, like, real denial until I actually felt something moving inside of me," says Linda Pollard, now a senior at El Modena High School and the mother of a 5-year-old daughter. "I have a big mouth--I like to tell people things. But this was something I couldn't tell anyone, I was so scared."
The statistics are frustrating and frightening. In the past decade, births among young girls have climbed both nationally and locally--although the population of 10- to 14-year-olds, caught in between baby booms, has declined.
Recently released figures show that in 1989 at least 61 girls under age 15 had babies in Orange County--up from 49 girls the previous year and 22 girls in 1979. The increase mirrors the national trend, in which, in 1989, 10,588 girls ages 10 to 14 gave birth....
The Casey decision came in 1992. The incidence of teen pregnancy from that date has risen.
The Casey decision was not a clear majority, but, a plurality.
Except for three opening sections of the O'Connor-Kennedy-Souter opinion, Casey was a divided judgment, as no other sections of any opinion were joined by a majority of justices. However, the plurality decision jointly written by Justices Souter, O'Connor, and Kennedy is recognized as the lead opinion with precedential weight because each of its parts were concurred in by at least two other Justices, albeit different ones for each part.
Casey needs to be revisited with fresh statistics. The new Emergency Contraception will mitigate the statistics now, but, I am fairly confident the impact of Casey was negative to many, many teens.

A teenage should never, ever be required to sustain a pregnancy. That mandate is out of the question.

The Massachusetts teen birth rate has dropped more than 50 percent since 1989.
The latest numbers from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health from 2010 show teen birth rates at their lowest level on record.
That’s good news for those who work with teens to prevent unwanted pregnancies.
“Tapestry feels really, really good about the role we play in providing preventive birth control and helping kids know how to say no,” says Leslie Tarr-Laurie, President and CEO of Tapestry health.
Tarr-Laurie also says that access to emergency contraception has reduced the number of teen births.
“One thing that has played a significant role is access to emergency contraception, which is one pill that is taken up to five days after unprotected sex,” Tarr-Laurie adds.
Last year, she says Tapestry distributed more than a thousand emergency contraceptive pills....

Medicaid is paying for half the births in Oregon? Really?

The year is 2009. The color of each state indicates the number of pregnancies paid for by Medicaid. If one side of a political agenda is paid for by my tax dollars why isn't there an equal representation of a women's right to choice within these statistics?
Not only that, but, what is UP with all these incredibly high Medicaid deductibles. It started with $4.00 co-pay for a medication and now it obstructs a person's ability to pay the co-pay to receive treatment? What's up with that?
If we are going to pay for pregnancy, then we sure better be able to pay for the Morning After Pill!!!!!!!!!! Dah!
In honor of National Women’s Health Week, (click here) Oregon Rep. Carolyn Tomei, D-Milwaukie, talked up the benefits of a health initiative that encourages primary care providers to ask women whether they wish to get pregnant within the year or not.
The goal is to provide prenatal care to women who want a baby and contraception options to those who do not. Unintended pregnancies stress out family finances as well as taxpayers, who pick up the cost for half of all births in Oregon, Tomei said on the floor of the Oregon House.  
"In Oregon in 2010, 49 percent of all pregnancies were unintended. Fifty-three percent of all deliveries were paid for by Medicaid," she said.
PolitiFact Oregon was intrigued by the statistic that nearly half of all pregnancies in Oregon in 2010 were unintended. How would anyone track that? What does it mean? Plus, we wanted to know if Medicaid -- a portion of which is called the Oregon Health Plan in Oregon -- paid for 53 percent of all deliveries.  

This is the growing status of many women in the USA. Once a leader in women's rights, the USA is falling into impoverishment of women's status.




If the idea this film applies to many women in the USA makes you feel uncomfortable, it is time to face the facts about the failing status of women in the USA.

This film tells the story (click here) of Ms. A, a young Asian woman with an unwanted pregnancy. Take a walk with Ms. A and discover the barriers she encounters, the stigma she is forced to face and the legal conundrums she has to unravel before she can access safe, affordable and legal abortion. Will she succeed? Or will she become one of the 9.6 million women who are forced to risk unsafe abortions every year in Asia.

Women in the USA do not operate in a vacuum. There is an entire world of women just like them.

International Campaign for Women's Right to Safe Abortion (click here)

Date: 
11/05/2012 - 19:26
The International Consortium for Medical Abortion (ICMA) has launched a new international campaign for women's right to safe abortion. The European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health and other relevant organisations and societies have been invited to take a part in it, so as to challenge the growing threat posed by some conservative political and religious forces that are blocking efforts to improve laws and provide services, determined to exclude abortion from maternal mortality reduction and family planning initiatives....
...Strangely, researchers (click here) have never followed American women who, like S., couldn't get the abortions they wanted, the New York Times Magazine reported. That's about to change. The magazine reported on a study, led by Diana Greene Foster, a demographer and professor of ob-gyn at the University of California, San Francisco. Foster's study is the first to track American women like this over a longer period of time—and the first in the world to compare those women with peers who successfully received abortions.
Although her study is ongoing, Foster already has some answers. Compared to their peers who received abortions, women who can't get the abortions they want have poorer health and are more likely to live in poverty two years on, even though they qualified for government assistance programs as new moms. Meanwhile, everybody in the study, whether they got abortions or not, generally had the same levels of depression and anxiety....
A government like the USA cannot limit women's options in life, assign them to motherhood and then cut off their nutritional support. They do not equate. If ever abortion was eliminated from the rights of women the government has to pick up the slack for the lack of opportunity and choices.

Enforced poverty is not an option in the USA. This is not exclusively a woman's issue. Women are often in relationships. If those relationships are strained because of an unwanted pregnancy; what is she going to do? What then is he going to do? How many men are in poverty because of unwanted pregnancies?
House votes to cut food stamps by $2 billion US (click here)

By Mary Clare Jalonick
June 19, 2013

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House voted on Wednesday to cut food stamps by $2 billion a year as part of a wide-ranging farm bill.
The chamber rejected 234-188 a Democratic amendment to the five-year, half-trillion-dollar farm legislation that would have maintained current spending on food stamps, now called the Supplement Nutrition Assistance Program,  or SNAP. The overall bill cuts the $80 billion-a-year program by about 3 percent and makes it harder for some people to qualify.
The food stamp cuts have complicated passage of the bill and its farm-state supporters were working to secure votes Wednesday. Many conservatives have said the food stamp cuts do not go far enough since the program has doubled in cost in the last five years and now feeds 1 in 7 Americans. Liberals have argued against any reductions, contending the House plan could take as many as 2 million needy recipients off the rolls. The White House has threatened a veto over the food stamp cuts....