When these discussions are excluded from dialogues of Progressives, Democrats or Liberals it adds to the idea these are very important to the defeat of the established Democratic Party. It is wrong to leave these poisons in our country's dialogue.
As the nation’s chief diplomat, (click here) Hillary Clinton was responsible for ascertaining whether information in her possession was classified and acknowledged that “negligent handling” of that information could jeopardize national security, according to a copy of an agreement she signed upon taking the job.
A day after assuming office as secretary of state, Clinton signed a Sensitive Compartmented Information Nondisclosure Agreement that laid out criminal penalties for “any unauthorized disclosure” of classified information.
Experts have guessed that Clinton signed such an agreement, but a copy of her specific contract, obtained by the Competitive Enterprise Institute through an open records request and shared with the Washington Free Beacon, reveals for the first time the exact language of the NDA....
As the nation’s chief diplomat, (click here) Hillary Clinton was responsible for ascertaining whether information in her possession was classified and acknowledged that “negligent handling” of that information could jeopardize national security, according to a copy of an agreement she signed upon taking the job.
A day after assuming office as secretary of state, Clinton signed a Sensitive Compartmented Information Nondisclosure Agreement that laid out criminal penalties for “any unauthorized disclosure” of classified information.
Experts have guessed that Clinton signed such an agreement, but a copy of her specific contract, obtained by the Competitive Enterprise Institute through an open records request and shared with the Washington Free Beacon, reveals for the first time the exact language of the NDA....
Already the right wing political media is stating these documents are fool proof evidence of crimes committed by Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State. That is a lie and the only reason it is in the Republican rhetoric is because it LEADS a believable deception.
The only assault against the private server of the then Secretary Hillary Clinton were ATTEMPTS by Russian hackers (click here) to gain entry. Evidently, the FBI is somewhat impressed by the Secretary's private server as hackers did not make it into information. There is nothing forthcoming about actual damage to the country's national security.
That stated, if there were hackers successful'; it isn't as though the government hasn't experienced hackers as well. Additionally, we have witnessed whistle blowers come forward to report to the people they aren't safe from the intrusions of their government.
The non-disclosure agreement states there can be no negligence. There was none. The Secretary successfully handled private emails on her server. There is no solid legal infraction when laypersons say, "But, everything she did and everything she said is confidential." That is sniping and it is testing the waters for ANY evidence of acceptance to the political vapors of the electorate. That is completely hideous. If that was the case there would be no press conferences or daily briefings. The State Department has daily briefings as well.
Now, when someone finally comes forward with litigable evidence I might even be interested in reading rather than having the lies permeate the low information voters of the right wing extremists. Such dialogue only proves the tabloid media has more success than establishment media.
The only assault against the private server of the then Secretary Hillary Clinton were ATTEMPTS by Russian hackers (click here) to gain entry. Evidently, the FBI is somewhat impressed by the Secretary's private server as hackers did not make it into information. There is nothing forthcoming about actual damage to the country's national security.
That stated, if there were hackers successful'; it isn't as though the government hasn't experienced hackers as well. Additionally, we have witnessed whistle blowers come forward to report to the people they aren't safe from the intrusions of their government.
The non-disclosure agreement states there can be no negligence. There was none. The Secretary successfully handled private emails on her server. There is no solid legal infraction when laypersons say, "But, everything she did and everything she said is confidential." That is sniping and it is testing the waters for ANY evidence of acceptance to the political vapors of the electorate. That is completely hideous. If that was the case there would be no press conferences or daily briefings. The State Department has daily briefings as well.
Now, when someone finally comes forward with litigable evidence I might even be interested in reading rather than having the lies permeate the low information voters of the right wing extremists. Such dialogue only proves the tabloid media has more success than establishment media.
Is there something wrong with featuring a strange set of lights over Area 51 when in fact there were strange lights over Area 51? I don't ever remember a documentary featuring complete transparency to Area 51.
Allow me to remind the media, regardless of main stream or not, we have some very interesting people running for office on both sides of the aisle. As of January 20, 2017 we will have our Executive Branch replaced with the winner of the elections from the year before. I think everyone needs to pay attention.
The USA is a democracy where people with the ambition and talents to be President are encouraged to run for office. The American people want a real hero. They want someone they TRUST. They want their government back. That is the basis of the choice in 2016.
The American people need plenty of good information and not rhetoric or lies that pander to their gullibility. They need the truth leading to real facts. I would hope all the media values their freedom and safety in the USA. I would expect that freedom and safety equates to a truth telling media rather than a 'gotcha media.' We need to hear what competency sounds like, not what the media believes is best for their venue. If the media can sell a candidate like "W" that turns out to be a nightmare that won't go over well with the country.
I mean, let's face it, the American media oversaw the election of "W." It doesn't get worse than that.
Allow me to remind the media, regardless of main stream or not, we have some very interesting people running for office on both sides of the aisle. As of January 20, 2017 we will have our Executive Branch replaced with the winner of the elections from the year before. I think everyone needs to pay attention.
The USA is a democracy where people with the ambition and talents to be President are encouraged to run for office. The American people want a real hero. They want someone they TRUST. They want their government back. That is the basis of the choice in 2016.
The American people need plenty of good information and not rhetoric or lies that pander to their gullibility. They need the truth leading to real facts. I would hope all the media values their freedom and safety in the USA. I would expect that freedom and safety equates to a truth telling media rather than a 'gotcha media.' We need to hear what competency sounds like, not what the media believes is best for their venue. If the media can sell a candidate like "W" that turns out to be a nightmare that won't go over well with the country.
I mean, let's face it, the American media oversaw the election of "W." It doesn't get worse than that.
