Wednesday, April 03, 2013

Does it matter that we are completely clear on Background Checks for Gun Purchase?

The media states people are complaining that the statistics on background checks is too old to be reliable. The complaint is that 40% of guns purchased are done without background checks was a statistic at the time the Brady Bill was passed and doesn't apply. There is the other complaint that 40% of background checks are not required by law.

So what?

Does anyone actually presume to argue that all guns sold should not receive background checks?

Does anyone believe there are no guns sold illegally?

Does anyone believe there are guns EXCHANGED without the exchange of cash? Are those EXCHANGES requiring background checks?

The arguments are irrelevant. I don't care if the statistics are old. I don't care if there are 40% of sales not requiring background checks. I don't care if EXCHANGES of guns occur or there are guns sold illegally. This is ONLY MORE PROOF there is lack of cohesion in applying the laws and statistics regarding guns and the only real solution is to ban them. That is the only answer, it will be the only answer and I don't see anything changing about that.

Assign every statement about guns five Pinocchio or Pants on Fire, I don't care. There are too many guns on the street in the hands of people that should not have them while killing innocent people and gun crimes are committed. Criminals are obtaining guns and carrying on to cause anarchy in the USA.

The ONLY WAY.

The ONLY WAY.

The ONLY WAY to stop the mayhem occurring in the USA is to ban guns. There isn't any other argument that adds up that will have the effectiveness Americans are looking for.

The talk is over and Americans want gun control. There isn't anything else to understand. Parsing words will stop. Political dogma will end.

End of discussion.