Monday, August 20, 2007

When wondering where all the water comes from and why it doesn't go away, consider this:


Arctic sea ice melted at an unprecedented rate during the summer of 2007. Much of the melting occurred in the East Siberian Sea. The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite captured part of that region on June 15 and July 27, 2007. These images show a portion of the coast of eastern Siberia and the New Siberian Islands, roughly 1,900 kilometers (1,200 miles) northwest of Alaska. Despite some cloud cover, the images show pronounced sea ice retreat over a period of 42 days.

There goes the North Pole (click here)
Sunday, August 19, 2007 8:10 PM MDT
Colorado Daily Staff ReportUniversity of Colorado at Boulder researchers are now forecasting a 92 percent chance that the 2007 September minimum extent of sea ice across the Arctic region will set an all-time record low.The researchers, who forecast in April a 33 percent chance the September minimum of sea ice would set a new record, dramatically revised their prediction following a rapid disintegration of sea ice during July, said Research Associate Sheldon Drobot of CU-Boulder's Colorado Center for Astrodynamics.“During the first week in July, the Arctic sea ice started to disappear at rates we had never seen before,” said Drobot, who leads CCAR's Arctic Regional Ice Forecasting System group in CU-Boulder's aerospace engineering sciences department....


England under water: scientists confirm global warming link to increased rain (click here)
By Michael McCarthy, Environment Editor
Published: 23 July 2007
It's official: the heavier rainfall in Britain is being caused by climate change, a major new scientific study will reveal this week, as the country reels from summer downpours of unprecedented ferocity.
More intense rainstorms across parts of the northern hemisphere are being generated by man-made global warming, the study has established for the first time ­ an effect which has long been predicted but never before proved.
The study's findings will be all the more dramatic for being disclosed as Britain struggles to recover from the phenomenal drenching of the past few days, during which more than a month's worth of rain fell in a few hours in some places, and floods forced thousands from their homes.
The "major rainfall event" of last Friday ­ fully predicted as such by the Met Office ­ has given the country a quite exceptional battering, with the Thames still rising. In Gloucester water levels had reached 34 feet, just 12 inches below flood defences ­ the same level as during the flood of 1947 ­ although a police spokesman said last night that the River Severn had stopped rising.
Last night vast areas of the country around Gloucestershire and Worcestershire were still inundated, large numbers of people in temporary accommodation, transport links were widely disrupted, and yet more householders were standing by to be flooded in their turn, in one of the biggest civil emergencies Britain has seen.
About 150,000 residents in Gloucestershire were left without drinking water when the Mythe Water Treatment Works in Tewkesbury became inoperable after flooding. Another 200,000 people are at risk of losing their supplies. The water shortages may last until Wednesday and 600 water tanks were being drafted to the area.
Panic buying of bottled water was reported, with supermarkets selling out of stocks, and there were contamination problems in south London, where 80,000 households and businesses in the Sutton area were advised to boil their water after rain got into a tank. Yet another potential danger was from car thieves; West Mercia police warned drivers who had abandoned their cars in the floodwater to collect them quickly to prevent theft.
The Great Flood of July is all the more remarkable for following right on from the Great Flood of June, which caused similar havoc in northern towns such as Doncaster and Hull, after a similar series of astonishingly torrential downpours on 24 June.
Meteorologists agree that the miserably wet British summer of 2007 has generally been caused by a southward shift towards Britain of the jetstream, the high-level airflow that brings depressions eastwards across the Atlantic. This is fairly normal. But debate is going on about whether climate change may be responsible for the intensity of the two freak rainfall episodes, which have caused flooding the like of which has never been seen in many places.
This is because the computer models used to predict the future course of global warming all show heavier rainfall, and indeed, "extreme rainfall events", as one of its principal consequences.
The new study, carried out jointly by several national climate research institutes using their supercomputer climate models, including the Hadley Centre of the UK Met Office, does not prove that any one event, including the rain of the past few days in Britain, is climate-change related.
But it certainly supports the idea, by showing that in recent decades rainfall has increased over several areas of the world, including the mid-latitudes of the northern hemisphere, and linking this directly, for the first time, to global warming caused by human emissions of greenhouse gases.
The study is being published in the journal Nature on Wednesday, and its details are under embargo and cannot be reported until then. But its main findings have caused a stir, and are being freely discussed by climate scientists in the Met Office, the Hadley Centre and the Department for Environment For Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
One source familiar with the study's conclusions said: "What this does is establish for the first time that there is a distinct 'human fingerprint' in the changes in precipitation patterns ­ the increases in rainfall ­ observed in the northern hemisphere mid-latitudes, which includes Britain.
"That means, it is not just the climate's natural variability which has caused the increases, but there is a detectable human cause ­ climate change, caused by our greenhouse gas emissions. The 'human fingerprint' has been detected before in temperature rises, but never before in rainfall. So this is very significant.
"Some people would argue that you can't take a single event and pin that on climate change, but what happened in Britain last Friday fits quite easily with these conclusions. It does seem to have a certain resonance with what they're finding in this research."
The Hadley Centre lead scientist involved with the study was Dr Peter Stott, who specialises in finding "human fingerprints" ­ sometimes referred to as anthropogenic signals ­ on the changing climate.
Last September Dr Stott, who was not available for comment yesterday, published research showing that the climate of central England had warmed by a full degree Celsius in the past 40 years, and that this could be directly linked to human causes ­ the first time that man-made climate change had been identified at such a local level.
The human fingerprint is detected by making computer simulations of the recent past climate, with and without emissions of greenhouse gases ­ and then comparing the results with what has actually been observed in the real world.
In Dr Stott's research, and in the study to be published on Wednesday, the observed rises in temperature and rainfall could be clearly accounted for by the scenario in which emissions were prominent.
The conclusions of the new rainfall study are regarded as all the more robust as they are the joint work of several major national climate research bodies, led by Environment Canada, with each using its own supercomputer climate model.
Global warming is likely to lead to higher rainfall because a warming atmosphere contains more water vapour and more energy. Since climate prediction began 20 years ago, heavier rainfall over Britain has been a consistent theme.

The weather at Glacier Bay National Park (Crystal Wind Chime) is:

Elevation :: 33 ft / 10 m

Temperatures :: 54 °F / 12 °C

Conditions :: Overcast

Humidity :: 77%

Dew Point :: 46 °F / 8 °C

Wind :: Calm

Pressure :: 29.85 in / 1011 hPa (Falling)

Visibility :: 10.0 miles / 16.1 kilometers

UV:
0 out of 16
Clouds:
Mostly Cloudy 3600 ft / 1097 m Overcast 4400 ft / 1341 m
(Above Ground Level)

Sunday, August 19, 2007

Rove should retire his strategy. It was a 'flash in the pan' rhetorical campaign.


The investigations go on, the indictments haven't even come down and if they did everyone would be receiving pardons from Bush. As a nation we can do better than 'the years of Bush.'


The strategy that placed Bush into office in 2000 was corrupt and then once there was difficult to overcome because of the trauma the nation suffered while he was in office. I don't understand how people could 'bond' with the incompetency that caused over 3000 deaths on American soil, but, they did.


Unfortunately, the Rove Dogma allowed Evangelical Chrisitans to believe they could rule the government and in turn change the world into one of their making. I am sure there is a 'ripple effect' out there that lives today, but, it won't last much longer.


The Republicans used the 'good faith' of the majority religion in the USA, the Christians, to exploit the powers of the USA treasury to float an economy facilitated by an illegal oil war in Iraq. They left the USA in shambles and the recent trends in Wall Street reveals all too well the faux economy of the USA.


The Republican candidates touting their credentials as 'born again' since they once were leadership of 'reason' rather than 'extremism' will find a country tired of rhetoric and seeking answers to profound problems. The Republicans have no answers. They have 'their base' which profits from that standing and they have 'the hope' to appear as the moralist candidate that god will bless with insight to defeat terrorists networks and hence save their lives.


There is a real world to live in and the choices that will provide a liveable world whereby 'truly' moral solutions exist aren't found in any Republican platform. They just don't. The Republicans have become extremists willing to endanger lives at all turns with very poor performance in worker safety, national health care, international relations, the venue of peace over war, the USA economy well regulated to insure food and medication safety, and any aspect of national infrastructure.


The 'thing' about national health insurance is that the 'cost' to the nation will 'be there' anyway even if nothing is done. The Baby Boomers are falling under Medicare. Hello? We need to address the issue of a single payer system, the cost to the nation will never be greater than with this aged generation of Americans. We need to manage a government system of providing competent health care to the nation through the next twenty years without causing a debt more than already has been resulted by the illegal wars of Bush and the rest of it will be a walk in the park for future generations. The best aspect is that the receipients of that care whom are Baby Boomers will be around and healthy to help with the cost through employment and investment that adds to the tax base, IF, they are healthy enough to contribute. Definately, a healthy American is a 'fiscally fit' America.

It's time to take back the country. Don't be afraid of it. We can do this, but, unfortunately The Republican Party doesn't exhibit the characteristics of leadership we need in the year 2007 looking at 2008 as a turning point for our nation.


Have a better day.

Indicted donor poses quandary for GOP lawmakers who accepted funds

HERE WE GO AGAIN !!!!!

By Alexander Bolton
August 15, 2007
Seven vulnerable House Republicans face difficult decisions about whether to return contributions from a major Republican donor who was charged last week on 23 counts of bankruptcy fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, obstruction of justice and perjury.
The donor, Alan Fabian, is the CEO of the Centre for Management and Technology, a Baltimore-based company. Until last week, he was also a co-chairman of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney’s national finance committee.
A federal grand jury has indicted Fabian for allegedly making $32 million in false purchases of computer equipment to pay for his lavish spending habits. Prosecutors are seeking $32 million worth of Fabian’s assets, including beach real estate in North Carolina, property in Maryland and a yacht.
Fabian has since resigned his position with the Romney campaign.
Romney and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, both GOP presidential candidates, have decided to refund contributions Fabian made to them this year. Fabian gave $2,300 to Romney in February and $1,000 to Giuliani in June.
Giuliani’s campaign wasted little time in distancing itself from Fabian.
“We are returning the contribution Romney’s national finance co-chair gave Rudy Giuliani,” said spokeswoman Maria Comella on Tuesday.
This may put pressure on seven vulnerable House Republicans to do the same. Otherwise, they will likely face Democratic criticism in the run-up to the 2008 election.
Reps. Steve Chabot (Ohio), Jim Gerlach (Pa.), Michele Bachmann (Minn.), Jon Porter (Nev.), Heather Wilson (N.M.), Cathy McMorris Rodgers (Wash.), and Dave Reichert (Wash.) have each accepted $1,000 or more from Fabian in the last three years, according to records on file at the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
Wilson accepted the most, a $1,000 contribution in October and a $1,468 contribution in September of 2004.
Heather Wade, a political aide to Wilson, said the campaign does not plan “at this time” to return Fabian’s money.
John Sides, an assistant professor at George Washington University who specializes in political behavior, said lawmakers who accept funds from an indicted donor face problems of appearance.
“Regardless of whether Mr. Fabian is convicted or guilty, the fact that he’s indicted casts suspicion on him and casts suspicion on the candidate for taking money from him,” said Sides. “It doesn’t matter if it’s only a thousand dollars, because your opponent can say you took money from a crook. The amount of money is only a detail.”
Sides said that lawmakers in this position have few good options available to them.
“It’s a decision between two bad things,” he said. “One bad thing is you keep the money and that makes you vulnerable [to attacks] or you give the money back and then you look guilty [of having accepted illicit funds].”
While campaign finance laws have been set up to limit the financial impact of any one donor, many voters view a $1,000 contribution as a significant gift.
“Any individual donor is not really responsible for very much,” said Burns. “But I don’t think voters necessarily make that distinction because most of them don’t give money to the campaign and many cannot afford to give the FEC limit. It just looks bad.”
Nevertheless, some lawmakers who expect to find themselves in Democratic crosshairs next year say they will keep Fabian’s money.
“We have no intention of returning the contribution,” said Matt Leffingwell, spokesman for Porter, who received nearly $1,500 from Fabian in 2004. “Until the individual is convicted in a court of law, we don’t return contributions.”
An official from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee was unavailable for comment.
Fabian has given generously to Republican candidates in recent years. During the first six months of 2007 he gave $25,000 to the Republican National Committee and $4,600 to Sen. Elizabeth Dole (N.C.), according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that tracks fundraising.
Fabian also gave $25,000 to the National Republican Congressional Committee during the 2004 election cycle.
The charges against Fabian stem from his employment with Maximus Inc., a government consulting company located in Reston, Va. Prosecutors have alleged that Fabian made sale-leaseback transactions for computer equipment that he never purchased. They claim he created phony companies as part of the scheme.
Fabian will be arraigned at the end of September.

Card carrying Republicans are looking for a candidate. They got it tough.


Who in this picture could be president? You got it, the Old Divorced Guy.


In order to get to Rudy's 'commitment/commandment' page I had to sign up for e-mails so I guess all the propaganda will make it's way to my attention. This is the Giuliani Contract with America.

Where does a member of the Republican Party that has to 'still' pursue the man that caused the traumatic and deadly events of September 11, 2001 get the nerve to run for President on the coattails of the 'idea' that Osama bin Laden is 'still out there' and spreading terrorism?


I guess when Rudy 'takes his jacket off' to roll up his sleeves the enemies of the USA know he means business because he can do the impossible. He is running on his performance in NYCity as mayor.

I'll grant you, New York is a challenge to lead but he didn't do it alone.

He became mayor of a city highly interactive to get any and all work done for the benefit of citizens. NYCity is powered by some of the most dynamic and skillful unions in the world. The unions run New York City and they do it well. They never get credit for it either.

Like Rudy, everyone's best buddy, any mayor of NY City flashes credentials of 'ruling' NYCity with an iron fist to 'make' people perform to tough standards. I got news. The people of NY City 'want' to do their jobs because they live there, understand the dynamics of their neighborhoods and what it takes to live a lifestyle that is more than pleasant. As an example to that, if one recalls the most recent 'power grid' failure, the people made it easy to be Mayor Bloomberg. They supported each other and made sure all went well. Those are the people that work the skyscrapers and streets of New York City. Those are the people that died on September 11, 2001. Those are the people that have become pawns to the party politics of this candidate.

Rudy Giuliani could have done much, much more as an advocate for peace and the defense of the USA while attempting to keep the focus of our military 'on track' in Afghanistan. He didn't do it. He sat back and allowed the USA to be steered off course in a war for oil. Where was he then? Where did he take his 'clout' as the mayor on September 11, 2001 when the Neocons lead this country into insoluable debt in an unwinnable war? Where was he then?

Where was Rudy when the United Nations was stating there were no WMD in Iraq and Bush was riding the deaths of September 11th into a Culture of Fear that would bring Republicans to majority to exploit the powers of the USA treasury and military? Where was he then?

If Rudy Giuliani cared about the people of this country he would have stayed at the center of the focus of any military deployment to be sure 'the job got done.' He didn't do any of that.

Rudy Giuliani is looking now for a new job. He wants the USA to believe he can somehow and innovatively 'lead by greed.' He cuts taxes so the people of the USA can keep more money in their pockets while giving up nothing in the way that government can provide for them. He believes somehow he waved a magic wand over NYCity on any day of his mayoral leadership and made it work, so he can do the same for the USA.

There are serious problems the USA faces including securing the monies from Homeland Security to stop attacks on major cities and causing fiscal losses that takes years or actually decades to reverse. The 'shame' of Giuliani has to be the fact Lower Manhattan is still in shambles with so many of the citizens of that city suffering from PTSD on a 'class action' level. He never adequately dealt with the emotional issues of families of the victims. His answer to 'closure' was handing boxes of soil from 'the site' to families whom wanted nothing more than to find some remains to bury. That was an answer? That wasn't an answer, it was a brush off. It was a 'power play' to get past the pain and grief of the families of those victims.

People far more familiar with Giuliani's mayoral leadership can speak to the inadequacy he posed to the people of NYCity. He was managed well by the unions and the people that live in that city. He made the 'city pretty' and closed down taxi stands that couldn't afford to pay the fees he mandated. But, a leader? Where were the radios to the fire department that could have saved the lives of the city's employees on September 11th? Rudy Giuliani is a Republican first and a leader second. If that is the candidate your looking for to be president of the USA then he's your confrontational choice, but, if one is looking to find a candidate that can lead the USA back to it's 'status' of 'leader nation' throughout the world then keep looking.

Mission Accomplished. Tommy Thompson went home defeated and so should Tancredo.


"If it is up to me, we are going to explain that an attack on this homeland…would be followed by an attack on the holy sites in Mecca and Medina.”

Republicans are all about image, they have no substantive qualities. They chase the only vote guaranteed to them and that is the Republican Right Wing. The people who believe they should rule the world and bring it under the Kingdom of God according to Jesus Christ. To achieve that goal they give permission to every corrupt venue of ascendance to power in government. The only aspect of the USA power structure the Right Wing Republican is interested is the military. It takes lots of money to produce weapons for God and a draft to supply personnel to carry out 'the final solution.'

It's unconcionable for a 'serious' candidate for the Executive Branch of the USA to say something as stupid and inflammatory as that.

Tom Tancredo claims he is the best possible person for president because he has 'the correct' immigration policy for the nation. So when the first sensationalized event occurs in 'the news' he and others flock around to 'sell their pitch' to the public.

...And Representative Tom Tancredo, Republican of Colorado, is bringing his immigration-themed presidential campaign here on Monday for a news conference “to denounce the sanctuary city policy of Newark.”
Some of the loudest arguments have been over whether local law enforcement officials should check the immigration status of people they arrest and then report those who are here illegally to the federal authorities....

John McCain is a great American. No one can take that from him, except the underhanded politics of Bush.


I could never today vote for John McCain as at one time I could have easily. He has moved to the far right in an attempt to be president, but, in doing that he lost many that believed in him including Independants, moderate Republicans and Democrats. He longs to be involved with war in the Middle East as a political tool at home, without a strong diplomatic effort and as a result will simply be carrying Bush's follies forward.

That is the last thing the USA needs and certainly nothing the Middle East does. The process of peace in the Middle East is so lost it will take a new dedication of hope that most certainly Bush has openly destroyed with his chronic war chants. The world has come to expect violence, empty promises and irresponsible denial in response to global crisis from the USA. We need a president that will lead in a new way which exudes an openness and willingness to solve problems rather than create them.

In the picture above, Senator McCain is attending a ship lauching with Bush. The champagne bottle was handily leveled by Susan Collins. There is mention of her as a Vice Presidential candidate with McCain. It would be an interesting pair, but, it wouldn't interest me anymore than before.

Basically, McCain is like any other Republican these days; stamped out of a Bush Dye Cast and willing to carry on Bush's legacy while giving up his own identity. I just don't see it. John McCain knows better than to invest in wars without purpose and Iraq has no purpose. It is not a matter of simply clearing the way for a return of diplomacy. It's a matter of demonstrating it, through efforts like mutual nuclear disarmament with Russia as impetus to stop the ever escalating nuclear proliferation being sought by India. At one time the USA's word was good enough, but, not anymore. American under Bush has brought the world to the brink of global war. That is a reality and not a myth. It will take much more than promises and good will to win back all we have lost under this administration and quite frankly McCain was as much the problem as Bush and to that end, the 'hope' of changing direction of not only Iraq but global reputation of the USA is lost with McCain.

Domestically, all his legislation has either been defeated by piers or trashed by the Robert's court. It has added to his illegitimacy as a candidate and it's nearly impossible from this point to reverse that reality. I don't see John McCain winning the Republican nomination. I don't know if he would accept Vice Presidential. I would think not.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Sen. John McCain said Sunday his support for immigration changes hurt his presidential candidacy because people were not convinced that it would secure the border.
"The immigration issue has caused me some difficulties with our base," the Arizona Republican said.
The failed immigration bill supported by McCain included border security measures and a guest worker program and would have legalized many of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants living in the U.S.
McCain has since endorsed a plan that would tighten the borders, but not include a guest worker provision.
But he said his campaign, which has been weakened by multiple resignations and poor fundraising, is regaining its footing.
"We are back on town hall meetings, and enthusiasm is there. And we're going to be just fine in my campaign," he said. "Every campaign has its ups and downs."...

The Orator - He is an extremist, yet he attracts a lot of attention because he is a good speaker.


I have little respect for the guy, because he has little respect for people and especially women. I would expect a man with as much experience in helping women deliver babies as he, to also respect their right to choose for the people they are rather than the 'enforcer' of some 'idea' that every fetus is an American. He's simply has ideas as old as he is and should retire from his rhetorical dogma.

He is a 'nice man' but a 'good man' is something he cannot muster.

He wants to demolish the federal government by stating he believes in the USA Constitution while gutting it of many of it's cabinet positions. He is an amazing orator and makes these issues sound reasonable, but, in fact he is the worst person for president and quite frankly he should not be in office for his views and their adverse effect on future Americans.

He states 911 shouldn't have happened but not for the reasons I do. He claims everyone should have been armed under the 2nd Amendment and there could have been 'high noon' at the OK Corral aboard all those planes. Funny, I think just preventing the terrorists from getting on jetliners is good enough.

In the year 2007, he is outdated except for one quality. He believes in peace. I'll be darn if I can understand how he'll attain it though.

This is the ONLY Republican candidate I would ever consider voting for and he isn't even considered seriously by the Right Wingers.


The good looking Senator on the right is Senator Chuck Hagel. I am sure we have our differences, but, he is interested in the issues of the next generation of Americans. I do believe he has stood out from Bush on numerous issues and has never been much of a 'grandstander' in that difference either.

He is a man of reason, not party politics. He is from Montana, I believe and some of those ranchers lost quite a few cows to very odd snow and ice storms in the winter of 2006-07. Not only that but at one point, Senator Hagel reversed his decision on a military draft. I recall him changing his mind to exclude that possibility and he actively doesn't see the occupation of Iraq as a productive use of the American military in fighting terrorist networks that threaten the USA.

He'd have to prove himself 'tried and true' and not just manipulative before I'd pull the lever in his direction, but, he cares about Climate Change when no one else in the Republican Party sincerely does. I think he is 'workable' to realize the brevity of the issue and the 'reasonable' solutions available to that end.

I not a huge fan, but, I am interested. I think many of his ideas are good ones, with an open mindedness that would invite expertise to any subject. Chuck Hagel is not biased to 'ideologies' so much as a man in pursuit of the truth and the solutions that can bring. I think he sincerely loves this country and not just it's treasury, military and assets. In other words when it comes to writing legislation that works, he is maliable where Bush is simply stupid and corrupt. I don't believe Hagel is at all corrupt. Never recall that as an issue with him.

OOoooo, we. Imagine that in the Rose Garden. (click for a picture of the next Repuglican first lady)


That man is old and that woman is not. If I am not mistaken, Thompson might be the oldest in the pack which isn't saying much. Except for two candidates, all Republicans were born in the 1940s. Thompson here was born in 1942. That was a long time ago and he will be serving for four to eight years? Who needs it already? I think Ron Paul is the oldest in the field and his ideas are nearly as ancient as most of the field, either. Fred Thompson hasn't said one viable thing in the way of resolving problems for this country. He simply 'toes' the party line in hopes that his FORMER popularity will win him votes on the heels of Tom Cruise popularity in "Day of Thunder."


Thompson is in the running in case everyone else is excluded by one reason or another and it's looking bad for the general election. In other words, all these candidates have a 'draw' and the reason they are running is to keep that constituency and eventually endorse them over to the nominee in hopes that will carry the party's choice through the general election. That is one thing the Republicans don't give people credit for and that's having a brain in their head. They figure as Karl Rove does, 'you can lead a horse to water and make it drink, too.'


There is no substance here and any Democrat currently running will mop up the floor with him and his 'rhetorical' candidacy. I wonder if his wife is like Laura and likes one of those barbeque chefs rather than a real one.

How do you spell corruption? D-U-N-C-A-N H-U-N-T-E-R. That's how you spell it.


Despite strong objections from the Navy, House Armed Services Chairman Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., added $25.7 million to the fiscal 2007 defense authorization bill to upgrade an experimental high-speed vessel based in San Diego and developed by one of his biggest political donors.
Hunter, whose wife christened the ship in February 2005, has boasted that
Titan Corp.'s Sea Fighter is a speedy, innovative, 262-foot catamaran with the potential to pack more combat punch than most larger battleships.
The money in the fiscal 2007 bill would pay for high-tech modifications to the ship's command and control, survivability, armament and other systems to make the vessel, also known as the X-Craft, operationally deployable.
"The committee believes that deployment of Sea Fighter can demonstrate and validate many of the Navy's operational concepts for littoral warfare," according to language in the Navy research and development section of the committee report, under "Items of Special Interest."
But the Navy, which did not request any money for the catamaran, fears the hefty add-on would squander limited ship procurement dollars on a vessel the service doesn't want. Service estimates indicate that readying the catamaran for
actual warfare might cost $100 million -- four times the amount authorized in the House bill (click here)....

Hunter wants a catamaran to catch international terrorists. You know, in a way with the circle of friends he has, it almost sounds right.


You might say to yourself, "Self, that isn't such a bad pork barrel spending issue, I am sure there are others worse than that." That might even be so, but, no one can deny that Randy "Duke" Cunningham, George Walker Bush and Duncan Hunter have something in common. That something is a corporation by the name of "Wilkes Charitable Foundation." Wow, what a great name for a non-profit, huh? I wish I had a non-profit corporation as successful as that with such a 'distinguished' name, don't you?


Contractor spends big on key lawmakers (click title of entry)
By Matt Kelley and Jim Drinkard, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — A San Diego businessman under investigation in the bribery case of former congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham is a well-known GOP fundraiser whose generosity to key members of Congress came at the same time his company saw large increases in its government contracts, public records show....
...Brent Wilkes, the founder of defense contractor ADCS Inc., gave more than $840,000 in contributions to 32 House members or candidates, campaign-finance records show. He flew Republican lawmakers on his private jet and hired lobbyists with close ties to those lawmakers....
...Wilkes was also a "Pioneer" for President Bush's 2004 re-election campaign, meaning he raised at least $100,000.

With help from two committee chairmen, ADCS got more than $90 million in government contracts since its founding in 1995, helping propel Wilkes from an obscure businessman to a millionaire prominent in Republican circles....
...Since 1994, Wilkes and ADCS gave $40,700 in campaign contributions to Rep. Duncan Hunter, a San Diego Republican who now chairs the House Armed Services Committee. Hunter has acknowledged that he joined with Cunningham in 1999 to contact Pentagon officials who reversed a decision and gave ADCS one of its first big contracts, for nearly $10 million. Hunter's spokesman, Joe Kasper, said the congressman was unavailable for comment Tuesday....

Well imagine that. Two men in love with the idea of being president of the USA. The current president and a presidential hopeful. Each got a huge wad of cash for start up campaigns and the like just for the asking. I'll be darn. There is nothing like recycled corrupt Republican 'greenbacks,' now is there?

The thing about Duncan Hunter that any Republican might want to consider voting for, is the consistency in corruption he brings to the White House that so many are willing to overlook. It would seem good ole Duke Cunningham took the fall for men that still benefitted from 'dirty dollars.' Go, figure.

When Sam Brownback was asked about Republican corruption, he stated "The American Family has to be reclaimed." Huh? Oh, yeah, Mothers are to blame.


The Senator is so desperate for momentum in this race he ran his own straw poll and guess what? He won.

This is the Senator that stood in defiance of the USA Constition when he asked Alito his position on public displays of religious holidays on government property. Alito and he just 'gushed' together as they proclaimed the 'public square' should be robust and all should particiapte leaving out those that simply don't participate. It was a bigoted moment, in sensative and self righteous for the entire world to see, but, Alito made it to the Supreme Court anyway. We don't need to propagate the mistake of that day !

"If I can do it, the nation can do it." That was his reply to a question regarding "Sicko."


A typical Neocon ideologue. He even touts himself as an ideologue when taking a position on Iraq.

When asked about the needs of health care in the USA, he believes so long as everyone goes to Weight Watchers or their weight conscious adult program of choice the nation doesn't need healthcare except for private health care. Doesn't matter American coroners not working on identifying Katrina victims have a new diagnosis, "Death by Insurance Carrier," the nationa health care problems will be solved when everyone 'bucks up' and loses weight.

Somehow, Mr. Huckabee's victory over fat consititutes a run for the Executive Branch and hsi proclaiming that cancer is on the run as well. You know the statistics for Americans that die without health insurance matches any third world country on this planet and Huckabee glibly states if the nation were in 'peak condition' there would be no issue.

That is only one aspect of healthcare in the USA which needs to be addressed from the ground up when 'physical education' is again mandated in schools across this country. I have yet heard anything from this guy except Republican rhetoric. No policies. No 'I would do it different.' Come to think of it, I don't know if anyone besides Ron Paul has anything different to say than rhetoric.

Maestro with a power point. The man that can buy the White House.


Romneys are worth up to $250m (click here)
Personal finance data are detailed
By Lisa Wangsness and Ross Kerber, Globe Staff August 14, 2007
Mitt Romney, by far the wealthiest presidential candidate, and his wife, Ann, are worth $190 million to $250 million, his advisers said yesterday after filing a personal financial disclosure statement with the Federal
Election Commission....

...Malt said yesterday that Romney had no knowledge of their contents until yesterday, when they were made public. Romney also has a separate trust for his five sons and their families that is worth about $100 million, which was not required to be reported under federal disclosure requirements and is not part of the filing, his advisers said.


About half of Romney's total assets belong to trusts held by Romney, Malt said, and therefore theoretically could be liquidated for use by his presidential campaign. The other half belongs to his wife, Ann. Earlier this year, Romney said that having to help finance his own campaign would be "akin to a nightmare," but since then he has lent his campaign $9 million....

...Malt also got rid of gambling stock this year, earning Romney between $100,001 and $1,000,000 on the sale of MGM-Mirage stock, according to the report, though Malt did not comment on that holding specifically. The forms show that Romney also owns $50,000 to $100,000 worth of stock in China Petroleum & Chemical, which has become controversial in the United States because of its links with Sudan....

My first reaction is, you've got to be kidding me? What agenda does this man have because he is a chameleon that has changed every color of 'Bush' since his first trial run for office some three years ago. My second reaction is, what was Teresa Heinz-Kerry worth?

Everyone will say, "Got something against million/billionaires?" My reply is, "Do elections for president have something against paupers (click here)?" I am serious here. I want to vomit to realize the power brokering of candidates running for the Executive Branch due to their wealth and faux loyalities. The current bozos have broken the backs of many Americans while making a joke of prospective homeowners that actually took 'a second chance' seriously. I doubt those folks will vote for a Republican ever again.

Bush's economy has a been a false economy. It is completely based in Tax and Spend. The Spending wasn't even productive spending so much as pork barrel projects to 'enhance' the chances the millionaires would be re-elected to produce one slimy spending program after another.

Romney has an agenda and it's not to be the best president the USA could ever imagine. He has no moral backbone. He has fashioned himself after Bush without the endorsement of any party members. See, the Republicans actually believe their best shot is with Guilliani while he tries to ride the 911 wave.

Romney has no character strength and those that voted for him in Massachusetts don't even recognize him now for his 'change' to harvest the far right of the Republican Party.

I don't want a millionaire willing to spend his own bank roll on a campaign to insure his election in the White House. It's supposed to be 'the people' that elect a president and the vice, not a personal bank roll with ego driven desires and faux agendas for the country. Romney is not a man of the people so much as a self made candidate willing to buy his way to the White House.

I don't think so.

Pretty in Pink. I got in touch with my spiritual side and sewed it myself.


It's Saturday Night

"why did you marry a republican" by JerkyDan

i used to know you
now i don't know a thing
i used to think i'd be the one
to buy you a ring
now there's misery you with that man
did you marry a republican

you changed your wardrobe
you changed your views
now you don't recycle
you only believe the evening news
now there's misery you with that man
can't believe you married a republican

you say its great
driving a SUV
more pollution and republicans
won't help the economy
now there's misery you with that man
why did you marry a republican

Morning Papers - It's Origins

Posted by Picasa

"Okeydoke"

Flooding kills four in southern Minnesota


Winona, Minnesota
Photographer states :: Flash flooding in Southeastern Minnesota caused severe damage Sat. night 8-18-07.
At least four people are dead after this weekend's rains turned into flood situations in southern Minnesota and western Wisconsin.
Rain on Saturday swelled creeks and rivers throughout southern Minnesota and southwestern Wisconsin, and flooding was reported in several counties. The worst flooding is happening in Fillmore, Houston, Winona, Olmsted, Dodge and Wabasha counties where a flood warning remains in effect. Crawford, Richland, Vernon and southern La Crosse counties in Wisconsin are also under warnings.
Rivers were still rising and more rain was in the forecast at midday Sunday....
When I read Middle East newspapers, I read for the leanings, movement toward peace. It is not only lacking in the year 2007, but, the USA has no credibility.


In contrast, Neocons would read the articles in "The Daily Star" for reasons to war. That isn't what I call progress in the Middle East. There exists evidence the foreign policy of the USA wherever there exists speculation for 'reasons for war' in the Middle East has failed.

A country should never allows it's foreign policy to be cut to the bone so the ONLY response is to 'go to guns.' Confrontation of ANY kind is the last option any diplomat should have available to win concessions and movement toward peace and stability. Confrontation ONLY begets more of the same.


We have witnessed over six years of confrontation by Bush/Cheney with the world. As a result, countries there are practicing nothing but protectionism with escalating tensions in the Middle East. We need competent leadership dedicated to peace with plenty of elbow room to work. That does not exist today.

"The Guns" are always there, but, they don't need to be waved in everyone's face; every minute of every day.