It is a strategy against the people. Everytime there is a televised incident with federal agents Trump and his minions scream bloody murder and increase the tenacity and intolerance of the agents.
I think the state legislators can pass laws stating federal agents must work in unison with local authorities. In this way, the federal agents will be working side by side with local authorities, including detectives that are aware of the problems in the area.
The theory Trump and Nome are using is that the states with Democratic governors are corrupt and “the enemy.” That is all a lie. Part of what is understood in Due Process is the FACT there is a reason for search and seizure. Basically, the theory the federal agents are using to carry out their actions is a lie and unconstitutional. They are operating outside the law. They are following illegal orders.
If the state legislators pass laws stating the federal agents must work side by side with police, detectives, and even SBI (state bureau of investigation) it is a safety measure for everyone. It will protect the innocent citizen, the federal agents, and local authorities.
The random actions that Nome is using as a tried and true practice is outside the safe practice of living. These shootings are proof the methodology by the federal agents is reckless.
There are plenty of law enforcement officers capable of testifying to what safe apprehension of illegal immigrants looks like.
I think in the legislation the practice of racial profiling can be clarified and controlled. I believe the idea is that someone with ethnic appearance other than Caucasian is not allowed to use racial profiling as a defense after arrest. Because of the nature of the current administration’s focus Kavenaugh didn’t want race to be a factor to end arrests. In other words inhibit an agents work. In all honesty, it doesn’t matter what Kavanaugh’s intent was. The words give a certain permission to discriminate based on Racial Profiling. What does matter is the clarity of it being a policing practice and how it is applied and what abuse of the standard looks like.
Example: Bush v. Gore. It was openly stated the decision was never to be precedent and repeated in other cases as precedent. Today, the decision is quoted in cases and used as precedent.
Reasonable legislation that uses fact, testimony by expects and exhibits the dangers of a reckless technique could hold up regardless of scrutiny. Trump should be apologizing for the worst federal offensive in the history of this country.
Trump wants more violence and internal unrest. It is a strategy to effect elections.
