Monday, October 12, 2015

The latest from Gowdy is that he knew nothing about the firing of Podiska over an exclusive investigation of Hillary Clinton in relation to Benghazi until this past Friday. He states the Podiska lawyers will not allow him to have a public dialogue with their client regarding the investigation.

Gowdy basically is saying Podiska is not a reputable person, can't be trusted or believed and the lawyers are hiding the truth.

It is a political smear campaign against Mr. Podiska no different than the one conducted against the former Secretary. I suppose when there is a media service willing to run with it; it works.

Gowdy is also believing his own lies when it comes to the emails. He stated none of the seven previous investigations called for the emails from the State Department. 

Hm?

See, there were wires between members of the State Department and the Ambassador. The wires showed an Ambassador who was concerned about security in Tripoli and was moving to Benghazi that would be more secure. So, the emails were the the least of the record. 

The emails at this point is the best outcome for Gowdy in relation to Benghazi. He is looking to make a huge discovery in the emails that will indict the former Secretary. I doubt emails are more convenient or effective communication than the wires. Not all places on Earth have internet services and that is why wire services are vital to the State Department. I would think that would be the case with the US DOD as well. 

Trey Gowdy states the reason Mr. Podiska was unacceptable as an investigation expert was because he was shifting Hillary Clinton to lesser staff members for the investigation. Isn't that what Mr. Podiska is stating? Mr. Podiska was relieved from his investigation because he didn't handle Hillary Clinton himself? What's the issue then? 

On one hand Trey Gowdy states Mr. Podiska was an investigation expert and on the other hand Trey Gowdy states Mr. Podiska was mishandling Hillary Clinton's part in the investigation. It can't be both ways. If Mr. Podiska is an expert, then I guess Mr. Gowdy's opinion of his work really isn't a part of this picture. Mr. Gowdy disliked Mr. Podiska's work for reasons, but, they weren't legitimate reasons. They were Mr. Gowdy's own reasons.

Is Gowdy used to being in the US Government yet? This isn't the civil court of the back hills of South Carolina's 4th district. This investigation is of the federal government. There is a difference. A very big difference. When Trey Gowdy states he knows how to run an investigation, he is referring to civil practice.  

I am telling you these Republicans have no idea how to handle power. They are already disqualifying a federal investigator simply because he has a methodology that works for government investigations. They are going to end up disabling this country for the sake of their own agenda!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mr. Podiska didn't get where he is by doing things the wrong way.

Actually, Trey Gowdy needs to be charged with interference in a federal investigation. Trey Gowdy really should stop talking to news agencies and complete his report. Trey Gowdy's public discourse in regard to the eighth Benghazi investigation can only be viewed as political. Why do it then?

I really doubt Hillary Clinton would be a successful fugitive from justice. There is no reason to be discussing a federal investigation with the public, correct? I doubt urgency is required in estimating the outcome of a federal investigation about Benghazi, it is the eighth investigation for cryin' out loud. I think the public has been patient enough with this mess called the US House.