How is it Texas can publish abortion clinic information without asking any physician to do so (under the guise of "A Woman's Right to Know Resource Directory," (click here) but, the execution team to a death row inmate is not known to the public as to the expertise?
How does that happen?
A legal citizen happening to be a woman wants an abortion and has to risk her physician being published in a resource directory knowing full well the clinic, her physician and she could be in danger by right wing Pro Life nut cases? And the State of Texas knows this danger exists, yet they publish the list anyway.
Yet, a person on death row due to be executed has their privacy rights upheld in protecting those that will execute them?
How does that happen?
Killers and their execution team have privacy rights, but, women legally engaged in life have to be exposed to danger beyond imagination.
Let me tell you how that happens.
MORALISTS illegally practicing religious dogma through legislation in Texas seeks to carry out illegal protocols they call 'lethal' when they are not. So, in order to cover up the scandalous lack of expertise and the illegal drug protocol they simply hide all the information from the public.
Those same moralists illegally practicing religious dogma in the legislature want to drive women into poverty, or better yet, into wearing a chastity belt even if married so they won't CHOOSE to have an abortion legally upheld by USA judicial precedent.
Does that sound right?
Two standards that dictate religious dogma through Texas legislation exist and neither uphold federal law.
HIPPA violations occur when physician's names are published because of the sensitive work they do and women are photoed entering a clinic. The Texas Legislature is one of the most self-righteous legislators in the country. Oh, granted the other southern governors try to 'out perform' Perry for the sake of campaign financing. All those are illegal. Women are allowed privacy. When a woman makes an appointment with a physician it is not for publication in the local newspaper. Why then is an appointment with a clinic under surveillance by right wing extremists known to assassinate physicians and bomb clinics permitted as a published list? A shopping list for activists that have brought impeding danger to women's lives, both by oppressive abortion laws and exposing their clinics to danger.
