Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Romney's Health Care System. Keep it privatized. I don't think so. We need a Public Option.



...The health care crisis in the United States (click here) is due to our commercial health care system. In the United States health care is treated as a commodity purchased by individuals, businesses, and even governments. Insurance companies, drug manufacturers, and providers are driven by a profit-motive. In countries with a Single Payer Health Care System, health care coverage is provided as a public good to everyone, like primary education....


And why exactly are there more physicians in Massachusetts?

Mass. hospital spending far exceeds national average (click title to entry - thank you)

By Michael Norton and Kyle Cheney/Statehouse News Service
Posted Mar 16, 2010 @ 06:50 PM

Hospital costs in Massachusetts, fueled by 14 years of increases, stand more than 55 percent above the U.S. average, according to a report released Tuesday morning....

...Sager and Socolar said the state’s 2006 health care reform law “is simply not responsible for the recent rise in the Massachusetts hospital cost excess.” They said the excess also cannot be explained by excess beds in hospitals here, long stays, or low occupancy. “No single smoking gun explains the durable excess or the rebound. Many hospital, physician, payment, political, and other forces are at work,” according to the report.

According to the report, the forces include:

-- High teaching hospital share of patients, MD supply, surgery rates, and non-ER outpatient visits;

-- New or recently reinvigorated factors: admissions, ER visits, staffing levels (not average compensation, wages or benefits), non-labor costs;

-- Substantial growth in revenue helped to make higher spending possible;

-- Very heavy and rising reliance on costly teaching hospitals;

-- The nation’s highest physician-to-population ratio and past private insurance regulations limiting fees spurred development of an elaborate and expensive pattern of physician and hospital care;

-- Hospitals in Massachusetts are unusually influential politically, they argue that they are vital to the state’s economy; they have become central members of business groups that once fought to restrain hospital costs; and some won vast financial leverage and power to obtain higher prices.

Sager and Socolar concluded: “ We have long urged that more money to finance business as usual in health care is both unaffordable and unnecessary. Both free markets and regulations have failed, resulting in financial anarchy and higher health costs. Most past efforts to contain hospital costs have failed about as badly here as nationally. But there have been some successes. It will be helpful to recall the forces that squeezed the state’s hospital excess to 30 percent in 1996.”...