Monday, June 27, 2016

I can understand how important clear definitions are to law, but, this is still ridiculous.

It will never hold up under ethics scrutiny. There is also a good chance he would be convicted again under a tighter standard. The result of Ms. McDonald's actions may be impacted by this decision.
June 27, 2016
The U.S. Supreme Court (click here) on Monday unanimously reversed former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell's 11 corruption convictions.
The high court vacated the unanimous finding of the Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which had rejected McDonnell's arguments and upheld the guilty verdicts.
"There is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that," Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., wrote in delivering the opinion for the court. "But our concern is not with tawdry tales ofFerrarisRolexes, and ball gowns.

"It is instead with the broader legal implications of the governments' boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute. A more limited interpretation of the term 'official act' leaves ample room for prosecuting corruption, while comporting with the text of the statute and the precedent of this court."...