November 7, 2014
Well, the morality of these people stinks. They don't care if you need medications that will literally sink the family budget or not, if the states haven't participated in the expansion evidently the state is suppose be the dictator of all the control they can muster.
I was surprised Rick Scott is back in the governor's seat in Florida because he has killed people within Florida by not accepting the Medicaid expansion. Voters forget about those realities.
This is the same kind of vengeful tactics against the people of this country. The plaintiffs are worried they will somehow ultimately be held responsible for the people in their state receiving insurance through the federal exchanges. There is absolutely no language stating that when a citizen of the USA signs up for health insurance through the federal exchanges the cost for the subsidies will have to be back to the states where these people live.
This is a human rights violation. When there are options in the USA that will save the lives of people and the states making the decision they can die instead, that is a human rights violation. There have been people throughout the USA where the Medicaid expansion was not instituted that have died because they could not afford health insurance. These governors belong on a list of murderers. Seriously.
Up to five million adults could die for lack of health care with the review by the Supreme Court of the USA. That means if one is poor in the richest country in the world, die. The poor in the USA die. Evidently, their social dependency is too much to accommodate. The TAKERS. The Working Poor. Go die. That is what the US Supreme Court is going to tell them.
By David G. Savage
The plaintiffs in this case want to eliminate the federal exchanges that people can access when their state did not participate in the Medicaid expansion. They want to dictate who lives and who dies.
...Currently, about 5 million Americans have subsidized insurance they bought through a healthcare exchange, or online marketplace, run by the federal government....
The plaintiffs in this case want to eliminate the federal exchanges that people can access when their state did not participate in the Medicaid expansion. They want to dictate who lives and who dies.
...Currently, about 5 million Americans have subsidized insurance they bought through a healthcare exchange, or online marketplace, run by the federal government....
...Administration lawyers (click here) and the Democratic lawmakers who sponsored the law have called the argument absurd. They say the law intended to provide insurance subsidies nationwide, regardless of whether it was bought through a federal or state exchange.
The language in the law saying subsidies may be paid through an "exchange established by the state" needs to be read in the context of the entire statute, they argue.
A federal appeals court based in Virginia agreed with the administration's position, but now the high court has decided to review that ruling, putting a central element of the law back into jeopardy....Well, the morality of these people stinks. They don't care if you need medications that will literally sink the family budget or not, if the states haven't participated in the expansion evidently the state is suppose be the dictator of all the control they can muster.
I was surprised Rick Scott is back in the governor's seat in Florida because he has killed people within Florida by not accepting the Medicaid expansion. Voters forget about those realities.
This is the same kind of vengeful tactics against the people of this country. The plaintiffs are worried they will somehow ultimately be held responsible for the people in their state receiving insurance through the federal exchanges. There is absolutely no language stating that when a citizen of the USA signs up for health insurance through the federal exchanges the cost for the subsidies will have to be back to the states where these people live.
This is a human rights violation. When there are options in the USA that will save the lives of people and the states making the decision they can die instead, that is a human rights violation. There have been people throughout the USA where the Medicaid expansion was not instituted that have died because they could not afford health insurance. These governors belong on a list of murderers. Seriously.
Up to five million adults could die for lack of health care with the review by the Supreme Court of the USA. That means if one is poor in the richest country in the world, die. The poor in the USA die. Evidently, their social dependency is too much to accommodate. The TAKERS. The Working Poor. Go die. That is what the US Supreme Court is going to tell them.
