Thursday, September 03, 2020

There is no statutory definition of "anarchist city."

The legislature passes law to define such concepts as "anarchist city." There is no such statutory law that exists today defining it. If Barr attempts to define anarchist city along political lines, it is nothing more than corruption of our Rule of Law.

The law recognizes anarchism, but, it is a local issue.

Currently, much of the criminal activities of anarchist extremists fall under local jurisdiction, so they’re investigated by local police. If asked by police, the Bureau can assist. But we have a heavy presence at a major national or international events generating significant media coverage—that’s when the threat from anarchist extremists, as well as others who are up to no good, dramatically increases.

Since the current practice is for local governments to recognize DANGEROUS anarchism extremism the idea Barr can simply drum up a definition and send in the troops is nonsense. There is no recognition by the law of the USA the type of infraction that Trump is trying to invoke.

Currently, the anarchists are Americans carrying guns and demanding "liberty" as a real definition of the law. This is the scary part.

27 August 2020
By Sam Levine

White supremacist groups (click here) have infiltrated US law enforcement agencies in every region of the country over the last two decades, according to a new report about the ties between police and far-right vigilante groups.

In a timely new analysis, Michael German, a former FBI special agent who has written extensively on the ways that US law enforcement have failed to respond to far-right domestic terror threats, concludes that US law enforcement officials have been tied to racist militant activities in more than a dozen states since 2000, and hundreds of police officers have been caught posting racist and bigoted social media content....

August 27, 2020
By Michael German

...These (justice) reforms, (click here) while well-intentioned, leave unaddressed an especially harmful form of bias, which remains entrenched within law enforcement: explicit racism. Explicit racism in law enforcement takes many forms, from membership or affiliation with violent white supremacist or far-right militant groups, to engaging in racially discriminatory behavior toward the public or law enforcement colleagues, to making racist remarks and sharing them on social media. While it is widely acknowledged that racist officers subsist within police departments around the country, federal, state, and local governments are doing far too little to proactively identify them, report their behavior to prosecutors who might unwittingly rely on their testimony in criminal cases, or protect the diverse communities they are sworn to serve....