Wednesday, March 09, 2011

Eveidently, the CEO of NPR really isn't the person for the job. She evidently wasn't capable of 'defending' freedom of speech.

...But what, exactly, does this say about NPR's journalism?  (click title to entry - thank you)

The NPR executive isn't a reporter, commentator, producer or editor. I'd hardly like my work to be judged based on the off-the-record, lunch-time commentary of a Post business executive uninvolved in its production.

And, yet, the fund-raiser does sell NPR's journalism, and, in the process, he makes its work a player in this scandal. He insinuates that those with whom he's meeting -- two men who claim to be associated with a Muslim Brotherhood front group and who say they might want to give NPR $5 million -- will find satisfaction in the network's coverage, which he terms "fair." What does he mean? Does this reflect some covert biases he might know about at NPR, or just a fund-raiser's toadyish attempt to pull in $5 million? A bit of both?...

It would seem as though 'Doves' need to have a 'time out' chair to realize they are under attack by Hawks.

There is way too much anxiety with journalism.  Way too much. 

I think of it this way, "If one does not stand their ground, there is a very good chance it will be lost."