This Blog is created to stress the importance of Peace as an environmental directive. “I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it’s hell.” – Harry Truman (I receive no compensation from any entry on this blog.)
Friday, October 31, 2025
Kevin Hassett believes politics is more important than Americans.
Potassium iodide
Trump’s soybeans
Thursday, October 30, 2025
Nearly 3:00 pm on October 30, 2025...
...with about nine hours until October 31, 2025. Then there is another 24 hours until November 1, 2025.
The current fiscal year has been alive about 30 days. Americans are waiting to live their lives because of the delay in Washington, DC. The problems the USA faces today are enormous. The American people are expecting Washington, DC to work. They want every Representative and Senator doing their job to solve the problems they face. The work to solve the problems of the American people is not being conducted.
The USA House is dismissed from work. The government is shutting down more and more everyday. I believe that is the desire of the Republican Party. Why is the USA House of Representatives being paid? They have dismissed the problems Americans are facing as important. The importance of American concerns have been dismissed and so the pay checks of the USA House should be dismissed as important.
The government shut down should be effecting the USA Legislation as much as the people of the USA. The Republicans are blaming the Democrats for a government shut down. There is no blaming the Democrats if an entire legislative house is on dismissal of their responsibility. The USA House is NOT solving the problems of the USA. The continuing resolution the USA House passed is hurting Americans. The only people seeing that as important are a group of Democrats demanding attention to the budget that is currently victimizing the American people.
The continuing resolution passed by the Republican majority is victimizing the American people. There is blame. There is plenty of blame to go around as the victimization continues to grow to more and more people. This is not a difficult issue, the USA legislature should be working today to negotiate the future of the American people in a way that is predictable and measurable. To simply decide that the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid is not worth the paper it is printed on and then to completely defund those measures is a victimization of the people of the USA that will result in their illness and death. There are many aspects of the health care law that protects American lives such as preventive care. All that is important and not simply the glib idea that emergency rooms can provide care to the uninsured. Seeking to place American health care at the Emergency Room destroys the fundamental nature of the American health care paradigm based in timely preventive care to cut the cost of neglected people with enormous problems requiring extensive stays in hospitals, etc. These parameters are recognized and accepted as the best health care for the people that require it.
The Republicans are cutting off the lifeline to millions of Americans by defunding Medicaid and eliminating financial support for health care insurance decisions. The Republicans are making health care decisions for the American people instead of their personal physicians. Not only that, but, the continued belligerence of the Republicans will be costing Americans the simple nutrition they and their families need to require health care. The SNAP benefits needed by millions of American children is ending because the funding is not available today. This is a huge problem facing Americans as they seek food banks to live and the food banks are defunded.
The resolution by Republicans is to pull the plug. The Republicans want the change of the future to happen now regardless of the neglect of the American people and the children in need. That is not governance. That is victimization. The people need a governance that examines the change needed for the future and to act on it. What the people do not need is an undermining of their ability to cope with inflation and choices that are all wrong. There should be no choices to make when it comes to eating vs healthcare. There should be no choices that dictate adverse outcomes. Those are not choices, those are creating a victimization of the American people they never asked for nor agreed were FAIR.
The Republican continuing resolution is UNFAIR to the people of this great country and the Congress needs to return to resolve the problems Americans face without first victimizing them as if they need a bandaid torn off their conscious in order to see their way forward. That is a strategy that is permission to create victims and then look the other way. The American people don't need a strategy, they need answers and the continued neglect by Republicans to even identify the needs of the people is what has the government continuing it's advance to failure.
Tuesday, October 28, 2025
It is called nuclear armaments for jets.
Follow the money.
Melissa has historic central pressures.
Taking advantage of gray areas of law.
It is not Hegseth’s private militia.
Monday, October 27, 2025
Category 5 Hurricane
Roe v Wade
![]() |
Why Letitia James?
Sunday, October 26, 2025
Jeffery Manchester
Health and Education
Abuse of power
Ten months and not one investigation.
Saturday, October 25, 2025
The Caribbean Sea is a sea and not the ocean.
Epstein
Friday, October 24, 2025
Jack Smith
The ACA saves lives.
Trump’s Press Secretary is lying.
Thursday, October 23, 2025
ABA - Ya hafta trust somebody.
Basically, the legal society of the USA recognize the Robert's Court as corruptive of the Rule of Law. You have to know if the Supreme Court isn't demanding ethical treatment of the political mechanisms that protect the USA Constitution, they are corrupt to the core.
The Supreme Court has sanctioned PARTISAN gerrymandering. Got that? Let's review that one time.
The Supreme Court has sanctioned PARTISAN gerrymandering.
The Supreme Court has sanctioned PARTISAN gerrymandering.
Yep. It is called corruption.
Since the Supreme Court has decided gerrymandering, currently called redistricting is the way political advantages are won in the USA, it is time for all Democratic Governors to get down and dirty. Sorry, but, there is no real ethical way to play fair anymore.
The Supreme Court, Gerrymandering, and the Rule of Law (click here)
SummaryJump to:
Although the U.S. Supreme Court has undermined the rule of law in a whole variety of areas, its treatment of partisan gerrymandering is arguably the most destructive. The reason is that gerrymandering is the one area of the law where the Court itself acknowledges that state and local officials are regularly violating the Constitution, but it has refused to allow any federal judicial remedy. And it has done that based solely on the highly debatable suggestion that it is just too difficult to establish standards for separating lawful from unlawful conduct. The Court created this problem by ruling, in Rucho v. Common Cause in 2019, that any federal constitutional challenge to a district map, based on the theory that it is a partisan gerrymander, presents a non-justiciable “political question.” As a result, in this one field, there is literally no “rule of law” because the Constitution can be violated with no consequences.
A partisan gerrymander is a district map—for Congress, or for a state legislature, county commission, and the like—that is intentionally designed to enhance the power of one political party at the expense of the other, regardless of how the people of the jurisdiction may choose to vote in a given election. This is a uniquely American problem because we are the only democracy in the world with two features—(1) the use of single-member “first past the post” districts (an inheritance from the British), and (2) systems that allow partisan legislators to draw the maps that we use (in most states). In other countries, if districts are used, they are drawn by non-partisan officials. And in most of the world’s democracies, there are mechanisms to ensure that seats in the legislative body are proportional to the votes cast by the people....
There was a time when gerrymandering was a bad word.
Redistricting has now become a survival of this democracy.
Efforts to redraw (click here) U.S. House districts for partisan advantage are spreading to more states ahead of next year’s elections.
Lawmakers in three states have approved new congressional districts since President Donald Trump began pushing for mid-decade redistricting.
The trend began in Texas, where the Republican-led Legislature passed a plan backed by Trump. California Democrats responded with their own map to help their party, though it still requires voter approval. On Sunday, Republican Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe signed a revised congressional map into law.
Redistricting typically occurs once a decade, immediately after a census. But in some states, there is no prohibition on a mid-cycle map makeover. The U.S. Supreme Court also has said there is no federal prohibition on political gerrymandering, in which districts are intentionally drawn to one party’s advantage.
Nationally, Democrats need to gain three seats next year to take control of the House. The party of the president typically loses seats in the midterm congressional elections.
Here is a rundown of what states are doing:...
The six Supreme Court politicos have corrupted decency.
...Tony Campos died in 2023, (click here) the year before his case was overturned and two years before the Texas Legislature cited that new court precedent as Republicans positioned themselves to grab as many as five new seats.
“It was painful to see my dad’s name in the news, for the wrong reasons,” said Marc, a longtime political consultant for Houston-area Democrats. “He was having memory issues the last few years, but he always remembered that suit.”
Forty miles away, Mark Henry watched the same proceedings and saw a very different story. As Galveston County judge, Henry helped overturn Campos’ ruling, getting the same court to approve of his dismantling of the county’s one majority non-white district, and rule that “coalition districts” couldn’t be allowed as a remedy to discriminatory maps.
This sharp reversal of four decades of court precedent was a seismic shift in voting rights, as celebrated in conservative legal circles as it was vilified in liberal ones. It will now be harder to challenge new voting maps in court, especially in multiracial urban areas where no one racial group dominates, and opens the door to redraw diverse, Democratic-leaning districts previously sanctioned by the courts....
I look forward to Governor Pritzker’s Human Rights Commission’s findings.
There are proper channels to report cheating.
No Respect President
Wednesday, October 22, 2025
Climate change lawsuits are intended as a tax on oil companies and consumers is a lie.
By Kamden Mulder
...As environmental activists (click here) across the country increasingly turn to the legal system to target oil and gas companies, a key attorney behind a case that may end up before the Supreme Court is saying the quiet part out loud: Climate change lawsuits are intended as a tax on oil companies and consumers, their legal merits notwithstanding.
David Bookbinder, director of law & policy at the Environmental Integrity Project, worked for years on the legal team that brought a suit on behalf of the county of Boulder, Colo., alleging that two major energy companies concealed the impact their products would have on climate change and are therefore liable for the resulting damage to the county....
In less than six months Zuckerberg is consolidating any idea that might be affiliated with AI.
Mark Zuckerberg (click here) will be spending more time in D.C. after he paid $23 million in cash for a home in the tony Woodland Normanstone neighborhood, Politico reports.
Why it matters: The purchase indicates a heightened interest in D.C. from the private sector, with bigwig CEOs seeing a Beltway property as a "personal embassy" from which they can court the Trump administration, Politico's Michael Schaffer writes.
The big picture: Zuckerberg is one of several tech titans to buy D.C. digs — a cohort that featured prominently in President Trump's latest inauguration....
Meanwhile, the company has been on a massive hiring spree, poaching top talent from OpenAI and others with compensation packages reaching hundreds of millions.
Meta didn't have to do this.
They posted $62 billion in net profit in 2024.
Layoffs come with a massive cost.
They should be a LAST resort for companies.
For many people, especially those on visas, it’s not just a job loss.
It’s a life upheaval.
Layoffs like these are short-sighted.
Meta’s mission is to “build community and bring the world closer together.”
You don’t build community by cutting people loose.
You don’t bring the world closer together by laying off 600 people in one of the most profitable years in company history.






































