Wednesday, October 14, 2015

...For many years the State Department has been engaged in a struggle to obtain the resources necessary to carry out its work, with varying degrees of success.  This has brought about a deep sense of the importance of husbanding resources to meet the highest priorities, laudable in the extreme in any government department.  But it has also had the effect of conditioning a few State Department managers to favor restricting the use of resources as a general orientation.  There is no easy way to cut through this Gordian knot, all the more so as budgetary austerity looms large ahead.  At the same time, it is imperative for the State Department to be mission-driven, rather than resource-constrained – particularly when being present in increasingly risky areas of the world is integral to U.S. national security.  The recommendations in this report attempt to grapple with these issues and err on the side of increased attention to prioritization and to fuller support for people and facilities engaged in working in high risk, high threat areas.  The solution requires a more serious and sustained commitment from Congress to support State Department needs, which, in total, constitute a small percentage both of the full national budget and that spent for national security.  One overall conclusion in this report is that Congress must do its part to meet this challenge and provide necessary resources to the State Department to address security risks and meet mission imperatives....

October 1, 2011
By Walter Pincus

...Andrew Shapiro, (click here) assistant secretary of state in its Bureau of Political Military Affairs, told a meeting last week of the Center for New American Security that the hefty cuts will compromise national security. He noted that the 2012 funding bill for State Department and foreign operations was cut 8 percent by the full Senate Appropriations Committee and a whopping 18 percent by the House Appropriations State and Foreign Operations subcommittee....


...Mindful of these considerations, the ARB has examined the terrorist attacks in Benghazi with an eye towards how we can better advance American interests and protect our personnel in an increasingly complex and dangerous world.  This Board presents its findings and recommendations with the unanimous conclusion that while the United States cannot retreat in the face of such challenges, we must work more rigorously and adeptly to address them, and that American diplomats and security professionals, like their military colleagues, serve the nation in an inherently risky profession.  Risk mitigation involves two imperatives – engagement and security – which require wise leadership, good intelligence and evaluation, proper defense and strong preparedness and, at times, downsizing, indirect access and even withdrawal.  There is no one paradigm.  Experienced leadership, close coordination and agility, timely informed decision making, and adequate funding and personnel resources are essential.  The selfless courage of the four Americans who died in the line of duty in Benghazi on September 11-12, 2012, as well as those who were injured and all those who valiantly fought to save their colleagues, inspires all of us as we seek to draw the right lessons from that tragic night....

This is from the Washington Times, not the Washington Post. Some media outlets can be entrenched pundits, but, when it comes to the national security of the country and that of our foreign outposts there is responsible journalism with a serious tone. They know when politics is essential to put aside and add another voice to the call for facts and the way forward to improve where the country fell short of it's own goals. I wish that were the case for all media outlets, but, it isn't.

September 27, 2012
By Shaun Waterman

Investigators (click here) looking for lessons from the fatal terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi might want to start on Capitol Hill, where Congress slashed spending on diplomatic security and U.S. embassy construction over the past two years.

Since 2010, Congress cut $296 million from the State Department’s spending request for embassy security and construction, with additional cuts in other State Department security accounts, according to an analysis by a former appropriations committee staffer...