July 25, 2019
Toward the end of his testimony (click here) before the House Intelligence Committee, former special counsel Robert Mueller responded to Democrat Peter Welch, who asked: “Have we established a new normal from this past campaign that is going to apply to future campaigns, so that if any one of us running for the U.S. House ― any candidate for the U.S. Senate, any candidate for the presidency of the United States ― aware that a hostile foreign power is trying to influence an election, has no duty to report that to the FBI or other authorities?”
Mueller responded: “I hope it’s not the new normal, but I fear it is.” During his testimony, Mueller added that “we are expecting [Russia] to [interfere] again during the next campaign.”...
Cindy Hyde-Smith is actually afraid that if foreign governments don't effect the USA elections Republicans will lose. They are Un-American. Just that simple. Anyone running for office should be representing ONLY those voting and not the influence of foreign power that seeks to end the USA democracy. They are cowards. They are afraid of their own voters unless they are UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF FOREIGN POWER.
...As if sensing an opportunity to prove Mueller correct, on Wednesday Republican senator Cindy Hyde-Smith of Mississippi blocked two election-security bills and a measure regarding cybersecurity for Senate staff. Democrats hoped to pass two bills requiring campaigns to alert the FBI and the Federal Election Commission if they received offers of assistance from abroad. Within the Senate, their bill would allow the sergeant-at-arms to offer voluntary assistance to help secure the personal devices and accounts of lawmakers and their staff....
Republicans cower in the corners of the American democracy along with White Supremacists/Nationalists and foreign powers that literally wage cyberwar against the freedoms and power of the USA. They are all cowards.
Foreign governments spending enormous amounts of money in efforts to end the power of the USA are among the most cowardly in the world. They don't care about the values of the USA in order to join capitalism as a strategy for their countries to begin to instill a strong middle class.
Cowards. That is what Republicans are, cowards among all the cowards of the world.
Having a strong and safe electoral system is the call of the unafraid to stand on their values and hopes for this country.
November 24, 2018
By Christal Hayes
Washington – Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (click here) attended a segregation academy in high school and praised a Confederate soldier's attempts to "defend his homeland," according to reports.
The reports, from the Jackson Free Press, an independent newspaper in Mississippi, and CNN, are the latest to bring up Mississippi's racist history ahead of a tense runoff election between Hyde-Smith and Democrat Mike Espy, who is vying to become the state's first African-American in the Senate since the Reconstruction.
In recent weeks, Hyde-Smith was criticized for a joke where she said she'd gladly attend a "public hanging" and be in the "front row." She was also captured on video making a joke about voter suppression, and photos posted to Facebook in 2014 show her with Confederate items and a caption reading, "Mississippi history at its best!"...
Conformable to fact; correct; exact; actual; genuine; honest “In one sense, that only is true which is conformable to the actual state of things. In that sense, a statement is untrue which does not express things exactly as they are. Rut in another and broader sense, the word ‘true’ is often used as a synonym of ‘honest,’ ‘sincere,’ ‘not fraudulent.’ ” Moulor v. American L. Ins. Co.. Ill U. S. 345, 4 Sup. Ct. 400, 28 L. Ed. 447.
The truth in law is based in evidence. The Truth is not abstract or plastic/pliable. There is a truth within any aspect of the Rule of Law. An attempt to change the definition of the Truth is a direct attack on the USA Constitution.
Aaron Zebley
...A graduate of the College of William & Mary in 1992 (click here) who earned his law degree in 1996 from the University of Virginia School of Law, Zebley worked as a special agent in the FBI's Counter Terrorism Division before crossing paths with Mueller....
Christopher Steele was never interviewed to the extent I have read the Special Counsel report. I would like people to cite a specific part of the report where Steele was interviewed. The Former Director is not required to speculate on something he has no direct information. If Steele was never interviewed there is no way of validating the facts. Steele cannot be charged without sound verifiable proof.
Glenn Simpson (click here)
The founder of a political research firm that hired former British spy Christopher Steele to compile a dossier on alleged contacts between then-presidential candidate Donald Trump and his advisers and Russia is refusing to testify to a Republican-led investigation by Congress....
I don't blame him for not cooperating.
Did the president destroy evidence? It depends on how evidence is defined. If asking people to lie is evidence, then he did attempt to destroy evidence.
Curtail = Limit
There was no specific point that the Former Special Counsel made the determination there was no conspiracy. It was a progressive decision as he reviewed one aspect of evidence from another. There was no specific point until he reviewed everything and didn't find what he was looking for that would be soundly conclusive. He determined the conspiracy issue after he reviewed the final evidence relating to that.
No one can intelligently discuss the evidence because it is secluded somewhere in the myriad of halls and rooms in the USA Federal Government.
The fact the Former Special Counsel recognizes he does not necessarily subscribe to the same conclusions as others is also a recognition that other applications of the facts can apply within the evidence without defacing same evidence. He also recognizes internal discussions within the department as absolutely confidential. Therefore, there are discussions that occur within the department.
In other words, Robert Mueller applies the law so the charges stick. That is a standard for criminal prosecution that also wins the respect of judges. In other words, when Mueller and/or his agents show up before a judge it is dead serious without question. The American people do not see his day to day work, but, the QUALITY of the FBI's or the Special Counsel's evidence is valid. That is the environment he works in.
The Former Special Counsel is not responsible for the letter from the DOJ. Just because the Republicans don't like the words Robert Mueller says, does not mean those words are invalid. The DOJ is known to be under the influence of the President's Defense Attorney/Attorney General.
The citing of public media reports occurs frequently because Trump carries out his crimes in full public view/in plain sight.
It is legitimate to say the Former Special Counsel differs in the way Attorney General Barr handles evidence and the report of that evidence in regard to his investigation. The evidence of that statement is the letter to Barr from Mueller on March 27, 2019 (click here of the reporting of the Associated Press).
Wait a minute. Do Congressional members of the President's party read mainstream media?
The FISA Court was mentioned as well. After reading only a part of the evidence about Carter Page the FISA Court better have been asked for further information on Page. Absolutely. Page was knee deep in Russian influence. Give me a break, he was a guest of a Russian economic university to make a speech.
The beautiful part of Page's speech is that he was supposed to set his appearance aside to allow Trump to make a speech and he did it anyway. Page was never insulted by the Russians when he was asked to have Trump speak, he continued to do so and made the Russian newspapers. Carter Page WANTED the relationship with the Russians at any cost.
Rep. Ben Cline (click here) is making a speech and not asking questions.
I don't are the qualifications of any member of the US House they aren't Mueller. This man was recruited to do this investigation overwhelmingly by Congress.
There is one Special Counsel report and while others are always tempted to add their own interpretation, there is only one document and only one Special Counsel and his extensive expertise and assistants.
Barr is investigating the Steele Dossier as part of an anti-constitutional agenda. That is why Mueller won't even lean into the question.
By Dan Merica, CNN
Updated 5:18 PM ET, Tue June 13, 2017
Washington - President Donald Trump (click here) interviewed Robert Mueller as a potential replacement for fired FBI Director James Comey the day before the former FBI director was named special counsel, a White House official said Tuesday.
The official, who would not detail what the two discussed during the interview, said it took place on May 16....
It is the responsibility of all the press/media to NOW print the truth. Trump is lying and the Former Special Counsel firmly denied he was ever interested in the Director of the FBI position after James Comey was fired. He only spoke to Trump about the agency and it's work.
"Allan Weissman attended Hillary Clinton's party." Give me a break, political preferences are not legally held as a requirement.
FBI Jobs (click here)
Deputy Director McCabe Ethical Guidance and Recusal (click here)
FBI Agents collect evidence and uphold the Rule of Law above all else in their lives when conducting their jobs. It is an insult to imply otherwise. If there is a problem FOUND with a particular agent there are policies. Agents that use their official handheld for personal matters are foolish, although there are going to be times such issues with family might prove prudent.
It is now 11 minutes beyond the agreed ending time at the US House testimony.
Trump doesn't govern. He insults. That is not governing.
The Steele Dossier is not the basis of the Special Counsel investigation. The FBI as early as 2015 detected activity by Russians in the USA. Then the FBI again after the hacking of the DCCC, DNC and Clinton campaign found it necessary to continue a Russian investigation as the evidence pointed in that direction. The then Director of the FBI was fired per Twitter by the President. Russians showed up at the White House in a matter of hours following the Director of the FBI. There was absolutely no doubt an investigation was to go forward. The Special Counsel was the only impartial method left to the country to continue the investigation of the Russian attack on the 2016 elections. The Steele Dossier had absolutely nothing to do with the investigation lead by Former Director Robert S. Mueller, III.
12:03 pm
12:45 pm The Former Special Counsel was helpful.