Tuesday, December 18, 2012

When I think of healing it is emotional and spiritual.

I believe everyone regardless of faith or lack of religious affiliation has a spiritual side. I think of spirituality as the connection between the emotional and cognitive. I believe when emotional trauma is indelibly placed on the survival centers of the brain through biochemical imprint the emotional and spiritual have to go to work to resolve the conflict which cannot and should not be repressed.

If trauma is emotional rather than physical there has to be emotional answers to resolve the feeling to benevolence of the person.

For me the best way for children to heal is to provide safe emotional content to express their feelings and find expression for their 'concerns.' Concerns can be worry, they can be fear, but, basically children can perceive their world differently and have irrational fears in the best of parenting circumstances.

I was once a parent of my young sons. I never underestimated their misunderstanding of life. But, to me for a child to feel safe to express themselves they need to have privacy (even in a room full of others, a child can find privacy of thought and expression) and permission. Drawing, making a work of art through modeling clay or painting provides the emotional connection between emotion and concrete expression. Only when adults understand the concerns of a child can adult(s) begin to communicate effectively and with indulgence. 

A child can cope. They can endear the memory of a loved one forever in memory of benevolence to self. 

Memories are forever and it is okay if emotions come to the surface when those memories are touched in the real world. But, incorporating LOSS in a real way to prolong the love they shared will make them stronger and give them more endurance. Teddy bears sit on a shelf and become thread bare. But, they last forever and all the memories projected into them are always there. Memories are wonderful things and they can be fond memories that never leave even though a loved one has.

The American Red Cross passed out stuffed puppies to all the children at the memorial service. It is also a common denominator between them now. That and the comfort dogs are powerful stuff.

I could not disagree more.

Zachary is being comforted by his Dad. It is his Dad he trusts and seeks. I trust their parents. If parents believe it is time for their children to return to school, then so be it. But, to impose a school schedule in the middle of their healing is counter productive. Healing doesn't happen on demand.

Sandy Hook Shooting Survivors Should Be in School, Need 'Routine,' Psychologist Says (click here)

Returning Routine is such mind speak jargon I can't stand it.

These are not adults that can process their world in a way that is rational. Children need time with their parents to be reassured they are okay and they are going to be okay. They need love and reassurance to feel safe. Masking their fears with routine is counter productive and will cause trauma all by itself. Basically, I don't believe in repressing feelings in children. They are very competent at using their own cognition to rationalize their own reality. They are very smart about their own world.

One of the heroes I witnessed in all this is a group of dogs that do nothing but provide comfort. When those dogs arrived on the scene the children smiled and actually found a great deal of comfort in their animal friends. It is not distraction that heals them, it is comfort and parents are the absolute best people at providing that to their children.

If administrators can't see their way clear to provide a longer CHRISTMAS vacation to the children of Sandy Hook School, then they should provide strolling dogs in the hallways and visiting to classrooms when invited by teachers to allow children to comfort themselves with REAL FEELINGS.

There will be children that will act our their repression today and in the future. They have to resolve their reality, not repress it through the insistence by adults. There will be children that will be overwhelmed by their reality for whatever reason is their own. They will cause interruptions in a classroom causing more feelings of chaos and uncertainty. None of these children should be required to relive that trauma by other children that have poor coping mechanisms and have not had time to heal. Children are a community all by themselves. Ask any bully.

I don't recommend school attendance for these children until after the New Year and they have had time to process this. These are NOT adolescents or teenagers, they are babies in so much of their reality yet.

Art therapy and desired Christmas presents will do wonders.

Concealed Carry doesn't work.

New Town, Connecticut was an example of people ABLE and willing to arm themselves. Every possible freedom the USA Constitution provides was in practice in that town. 

In order for Concealed Carry to work there has to be weapons provided to the citizens by the government, because, there is no EQUITY in the ABILITY to purchase weapons.

Militarizing the citizen is not a peaceful country. Perhaps, the Concealed Carry enthusiasts want New York City to be Syria. I am not interested.

The reason there are Bush Masters in the hands of pretty ladies for their sons to access is because they 'buy into' the idea they can actually prevent their own death by others better armed than them. 

Concealed Carry is fine for people with 'high risk' jobs or positions in life. Lawyers are susceptible to violence by others. They defend people others would like to see dead and lawyers are a target by angry people. There are other professions, but, then lawyers can afford the guns they carry and usually they fit in a brief case. Those that practice Conceal Carry aren't carrying Bush Masters over their shoulder. I doubt seriously they could. There are metal detectors to court houses these days, because, people kill judges. 

The idea guns actually CAN BE a benevolent part of life is one of the most hideous ideation in the USA. Guns are not benevolent by nature. They are dangerous. Anyone owning one or more have a very healthy respect for their power that could be outside the control of the owner. So, owners carry for reasons of personal safety knowing their personal safety is actually compromised by the very instrument they carry.

The President of the United States is REQUIRED to maintain the domestic peace. It is in the job description. 

Y'all sure you want to continue down this path of ? conversation ?

Monday, December 17, 2012

I reject any language in regard to gun control, except, clear concise language.

I've heard such manipulation today of the language surrounding gun control legislation and I reject it all. 

This is not a gun safety issue. This is not about making guns safer. I reject that language. A gun cannot be made safe. The 'safety' on a gun is to protect the operator from actions of the gun without predictability.

The legislation is about control. It is about gun control. 

The conservatives in this country play with words and for a gun control legislation to be called anything but gun control, gun ban and/or ammunition ban is risky language.

The violence in this country will abate and we will put this hideous genie back in the bottle. 

It is inconceivable this has happened. The twisted ideology allowing this country to enter into heinous crimes with a Second Amendment that is suppose to protect lives, liberty and happiness is about as diabolical as it comes. 

The language to the legislation has to be clear and concise. There can be no 'Scalia Broccoli' to come out of this.

There are no words to explain what I think at this moment. Every time I see those faces, the moment is felt to the depth of me. There are just no words.

I could speculate to what brought this shooter and the movie theater shooter to their heinous acts, but, in reflection of the two, there are huge similarities and it has nothing to do with mental health so much as social illness. 

There is more here than mental illness. Society has issues and they need to come to terms with them. Society lacks respect for decency and life and the tolerance of violence a person should be exposed to. 

I look forward to the conclusion of the police investigation, whenever it is finished to the degree they deem complete. I am sorry the town doesn't feel as though the school building is approachable anymore. There are some aspects of this that has to be accepted into memory. It cannot all be wiped away and time does make the daily living easier. I wish them all solace. All those people are going to be dearly missed.

Good night.

Where is PETA when you need them?



The Oregon Zoo recently (click here for video - thank you) announced the birth of a female elephant, but a newspaper investigation revealed the calf actually belongs to a controversial traveling road show that rents out the animals. NBC’s Diana Alvear reports.


It is a what? 


Where?


6:03 AM, Dec 8, 2012

MANSFIELD — An innovative piece (click here) of Mansfield is now part of the Smithsonian National Zoo in Washington, D.C.


Carousel Works, Inc. produced its first solar-paneled ride. The 64-animal carousel was recently installed as part of the zoo’s earth-friendly initiative.


“The Smithsonian wants to make things as green as possible,” said Kate Blakley, the director of marketing and operations at Carousel Works. “They were able to find a local electric company that was willing to donate the solar panels and they asked us to figure out how to make it run by solar power.”


Blakley said the creation took about a year to complete, a bit longer than other carousel projects....

I have a suggestion to a way forward for Sandy Hook Elementary School.

There needs to be some construction. The area where children and their adult protectors died needs to be demolished after the investigation is finished. A new office area and classroom area has to be built at a different part of the school. An addition to the existing structure with different doors and new security for the school. This school sheltered many children to be survivors, it is not an evil place.

In the area where the building is deconstructed a playground should be built. Whether it is a memorial to the victims is up to the town, but, the building is not to blame and the memories there are also good memories.

Just a thought, it would bring the town together to find solace for their deep and painful loss. Perhaps.

I would think Christmas Vacation for the students of this school should start early and perhaps trim the vacation times from other areas of the calendar. Teachers could even provide 'at home' exercises to keep their academics on track. Even 'online classrooms' until the return after the New Year. A lot of construction can take place during that time to provide a renewed view of the school for their parents and children.

Drape (construction drape) the damaged parts of the building and prohibit access except to investigators. Drape the exterior, too. Usually the color is steel gray. I don't know if there are other construction drape colors to match the exterior brick and be less noticeable.

There is every indication these teachers are very dedicated and very creative to fulfill their responsibilities to their students. I would trust them with this transition. They are incredible heroes and children are some of the luckiest to have them to be guides to life and learning.

It is time to get started. No more waiting. No more lives lost. We need to do this.

...On NBC, California's senior senator said her staff has crafted a bill that would "exempt over 900 specific weapons that will not ... fall under the bill.''... (click here)

There is no clash between rural and urban America. That is another myth orchestrated by the opposition. It is time to move forward. We need to do this now.

The reason current laws to minimize the danger to society doesn't work is because the culture of violence overwhelms our law enforcement and prosecutorial proceedings.

Why don't we prosecute those that lie on background checks? Because the prosecutors are busy with murderers and investigators are busy with murders and police are overwhelmed by the amount of fire power on the street and how their body armor helps them make it through the day.

The society within the USA is overwhelmed by guns and the culture of gun violence. What does anyone think it means when I state, "There are too many guns on the street?" It means they are competing for who does the best maintenance on their guns? Does it mean there are too many collectors showing off their weapons and winning ribbons for Best at the Gun Show? 

When I state "There are too many guns on the street," it means the law enforcement agencies, the prosecutors, the jails and the prisons are OVERWHELMED with the culture of gun violence in this country.

The current liberal gun laws in the USA pander to drug dealers. Anyone want to have this conversation or just get on with legislation? The overwhelming reality of the gun culture in this country propagates crime after crime after crime. We are running out of police officers. 

Hey, Mexico is waiting for the next pick-up truck load in exchange for drugs to sell on our streets.

We don't need the conversation. We need legislation and we need it now.

Sunday, December 16, 2012


Everyone needs to leave the investigators alone. They are only human.

I could understand pumping authorities for information if they weren't forthcoming or not doing their jobs. That is absolutely not the case here.

The shooter didn't prepare that much, except, in his own fanatical thinking to carry out the killing. His arsenal was in his own home.

His mother had everything in the house he needed. The only opportunity to stop him was when he tried to purchase his own gun and ammunition. When he was rejected it could have been reported to the local police that someone in their community is looking for guns and has been refused access. It could alert local police and investigators to a potential danger that he was looking for guns, but, that has its own shortcomings. Some people without such intent can be refused and they just don't know it.

As far as the shooter's mother. We have seen this before. Gun fanatics have all kinds of powerful weapons and ammunition. If a person is going to practice with powerful weapons at a shooting range the ammunition is very expensive considering the number of bullets delivered to a target in a matter of 60 seconds. So, she well stocked. She bought ammunition whenever she could afford it and possibly if there were lower prices than normal. We know that as soon as this gun community thinks there is going to be restrictions on access to guns and ammunition they are a run on them. I am sure it's going on now.

The shooter didn't have to look far. She probably tried to stop him. He killed her because of whatever was going on in his head. He wanted guns. He wanted to kill for his own reasons.

Unless there is a psychiatrist or councilor somewhere along the way that stated the shooter was planning this and for what reasons, his thoughts that day are buried with him and all those he killed along the way. This is senseless killing. It has no logical conclusion.

This is a tough case on everyone and the investigators are getting through it, but, this isn't easy for anyone. We need the investigators to carry out their responsibilities. They are forthcoming. It isn't necessary to stress them any more than they already are.

There are assumptions that this would have happened if he were able to purchase guns. The rejection could have triggered the anger. If he was autistic and raised as a marksman by his mother, there is nothing to say he was exercising his freedom to protect himself no different than his mother. When he realized he could not be that person he lost his bearings. That is just a guess. There is no way of knowing and not magical thinking is going to change that. That is why as a society we have to put guns in their place. 


I believe there is a great deal of misinformation.

The shooter was not within the authority of any school district. He was 20 years old, so the discussion about how intervention per-Columbine is the way to effect a defeat of the shooter is completely outside the possibility of such intervention.

There were statements about an unconfirmed altercation between the deceased school principal and the deceased shooter the day before the killings. I believe someone is making it up to propose the 'idea' the principal had power that could have stopped the killings. That scenario sounds like an NRA strategist.

Creating myths is the purview of the NRA. It is difficult to confirm events of a deceased individuals.

I am not surprised the social media is taking on a counter culture all itself to justify the idea that guns are safe. They are not.

The shooter is as much a victim of the violent gun culture in the USA. If the guns were not available he could not purchase any.

There is no absolute control of a gun. It is designed to kill. There has never been a gun in the possession of a concealed carry license or permit that actually ended and/or stopped these killings. That reality alone speaks eons to the wrongful existence of guns within the American landscape.

The shooter in Arizona that wounded Gabby Giffords was taken down by the unarmed citizens as a community meeting during the brief period he was reloading.

Looking at some of the pictures of these children my heart aches. They are gorgeous kids that were happy, loved and secure. This can't happen again. Guns are out of control in the USA. We can't even stop them from migrating out of our borders on a daily basis. 

Saturday, December 15, 2012

It is the guns, not the people.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.


Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.


Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.


Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not a cure for killing.

Mental Health is not the issue in shooting a gun.

Mental health doesn't keep anyone from killing. The problem is the guns. One of the things gun owners know is that they can be killed by their own weapons. That is what happened in this case.

The children were slaughtered. They were slaughtered. They weren't slaughtered by anything else, but, guns. They were slaughtered. Making summations about this being a mental health issue is disrespecting their deaths.

Mental Illness is not a cultural issue. Mental illness is a medical problem. Medical problems are a SYMPTOM of a culture but is not the culture itself. If people smoke tobacco, they get lung cancer. If they indulge in a culture of violence they seek weapons.

These 'experts' about how 19 year olds often manifest their schizophrenia which has been latent all those years are wrong. The brain at that age is undergoing changes and those changes allow all sorts of behavior. Any parent of a nineteen year old knows how difficult they can be.

Schizophrenia occurs in many, many cultures. It is not an American phenomena. Japan has people with schizophrenia, they don't go around slaughtering children.

Aspergers is not the issue. Absolutely not the issue and the media needs to stop victimizing those with Asperger Syndrome.

The very good evidence will be interesting, but, there will no reason for the slaughter. There is no reason, expect, there are too many guns on the street. If the shooter's mother didn't own and brandish guns as a center to her joy, she'd be alive right now. She might still have a difficult son to deal with, but, she would be alive. Somehow that isn't suppose to mean something? Either a nation values the lives of their citizens or it doesn't. These deaths could have been prevented but wasn't.

The media in the USA has a lot to do with these events.


In his weekly radio and Internet speech, (click here) Obama also repeated a message he put forth on Friday, just hours after one of the worst mass shootings in U.S. history, on the need to set aside politics and "take meaningful action to prevent more tragedies like this."

But Obama went no further than that, and again stopped short of specifically calling for tighter gun-control laws....
What does a journalist think "take meaningful action to prevent" means? It means there needs to be less accessibility to guns. But, yet they'll try to steer the dialogue of the nation into issues with mental health all the time. They target the 'actor' and not the weapon. They do that in support of gun lobbyists. There is a segment I listened to about how this was schizophrenia mixed with bi-polar disorder that pulled the trigger when the journalist knew absolutely nothing about the 'personality disordered' young man.

KTLA's Rick Chambers allows fantasy to exist about a shooter (click here). It is an amazing segment. Chambers wants to make basket cases of parents in targeting the mother for the problem with the shooter.

The Hartford Courant
11:18 p.m. ESTDecember 14, 2012
...The shootings took place in two first-grade classrooms around 9:30 a.m., sources said, and one witness said she believed as many as 100 rounds had been fired. All of the adults and 18 of the children were pronounced dead at the school. Two more students died at a hospital. A single victim was injured but not killed....
The undermining of decency in the USA occurs over our media and it is a parent's worst nightmare. The mother owned guns legally under the laws of the USA as they exist. The fact of the matter is the young man had access to weapons that were legally within our society. If the availability were not there, twenty children and the adults that loved them would still be alive today. It is access that is the problem and nothing less. 

The culture of violence that exists in the USA is horrible. It was spawned about a decade ago and it is among the worst civilized cultures on Earth. Whatever happened to Lassie?

The culture is violent, the media supports that culture even by introducing fantastical imagineering into the dialogue of the country among adult viewers. That is what is so amazing about Chamber's trip into the unknown. It was to build a fantasy of explanation around the shooter as if it is he we can all control. That is nonsense and to feed that garbage to an adult audience to attempt to steer the course of the country in limiting access to guns is not only an ethics issue, but, it has to be some sort of tort in the law.

Propaganda is a lie. Chambers manufactured a lie for his viewing audience and then stands on it to state, "The nation needs to focus on mental health." He might be right, but, it is the sick media that needs the most help.

Why? Why? Why?

Why? Because the guy had a guns, that's why!

Last night was nearly laughable on Anderson Cooper 360 if the tragedy wasn't so heinous. He stated, "We are not going to talk about the gunman...blah, blah, blah." And then he goes on talking about the gunman. During the time he was talking about the gunman he was stating "We are not going to talk about the gunman." He ranks right up there with Chambers with the issue of propaganda and misdirecting the focus of violence in the USA to continue to justify it. Cooper should be asking those parents, the parents of Columbine and all the shootings since Columbine how they see violence and the free flow of guns in the USA. That would be an improvement!

There are a lot of gunmen in the USA. There are a lot of deaths EVERYDAY in the USA. Try talking about that and then just maybe the propaganda will stop and the killing will, too.

Friday, December 14, 2012

Some school systems around the country are reassuring parents they are increasing police presence. That is probably a good idea.

Evil did not visit the community today.

A gunman with very powerful weapons went into an American elementary school and shot 28 people of which 20 were very young children.

There are no background checks that work, 40% of the guns sold in the USA are in the hands of people without background checks.

There is no 'crazy person' statute which prevents the killing of innocent people. 

An increasing number of gunmen with very powerful weapons have never been involved in a crime.

This is pure unadulterated violence that is a cultural component of the USA.

What was that about it being impossible to have a peaceful neighborhood without gun violence?

The culturally elite haven't made it into the USA yet. I suppose Mexico's drug cartel would be starved for weapons if Japan was their northern neighbor.

Explain to those parents why the NRA is more important than safe neighborhoods. Explain to them how the culture of violence of the USA can no longer be tolerated. Explain to those parents how much everyone, every legislator in this country is concerned for their happiness. Go, ahead, explain that to them now.

In part by forbidding almost all forms of firearm ownership, Japan has as few as two gun-related homicides a year.

JUL 23 2012, 1:45 PM ET

...But what about the country (click here) at the other end of the spectrum? What is the role of guns in Japan, the developed world's least firearm-filled nation and perhaps its strictest controller? In 2008, the U.S. had over 12 thousand firearm-related homicides. All of Japan experienced only 11, fewer than were killed at the Aurora shooting alone. And that was a big year: 2006 saw an astounding two, and when that number jumped to 22 in 2007, it became a national scandal. By comparison, also in 2008, 587 Americans were killed just by guns that had discharged accidentally. 

Almost no one in Japan owns a gun. Most kinds are illegal, with onerous restrictions on buying and maintaining the few that are allowed. Even the country's infamous, mafia-like Yakuza tend to forgoguns; the few exceptions tend to become big national news stories....

It is a good start, Mr. Speaker, but, only a start.

It is a good start to saving lives of children, school children, teachers, holiday shoppers, temple worshipers and movie goers in the USA.

But, only a start!

So far there is only one bill in the US Senate about children. What is taking so long to pass this bill?

S.645 - Child Protection Improvements Act of 2012 (click here)

A bill to amend the National Child Protection Act of 1993 to establish a permanent background check system.

What is holding this up, some kind of lousy filibuster? This bill doesn't even begin to address the tragedy our young people are facing in a culture of violence.

Communities traumatized by gun violence don't adequately recover. They are not soldiers, they are not suppose to be on a battlefield. Their homes are suppose to be places of security, peace and happiness. It is time for the United States federal government to look into the lasting effect of gun violence on communities and how best to stop it. These are the children and citizens that are the future of this country, there is no room for this level of violence within our borders.

More gun violence? 20 dead? 26 dead. 20 babies are dead. An entire classroom. Six adults couldn't stop it. Two hand guns and an assault rifle. Dressed in black. The Dark Knight Returns, huh?

Multiple people, including children, (click here) have been killed in a shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
The number of dead is unclear, but there are at least 20 shooting victims. Many of the shootings took place in a kindergarten classroom, sources said....
Don't over react? Really? Huh? Leading with our heads over our hearts is exactly the problem here. We allow too much tolerance for guns on our streets.

Don't tell me for one minute this is not cultural. It is a culture of violence in the USA. Young people are killed everyday in the USA. This just happens to be 20 at a time.

December 12, 2012 7:29 PM


...Police said Komperda (click here) was not the intended target, but the gunman might have been targeting a family member.
The shooter allegedly approached Thompson for help and he agreed because “he wanted to be popular and have status in the neighborhood and with the shooter,” according to court records.
Thompson had no criminal background....

This might be a mimic to what happened in the mall, too. One mass attack gives permission of another and so on and so forth. We don't need heroes, we need safe people. I don't doubt there are people who are heroes in all these circumstances, that is not the point.

Little children are dead and the US House of Representatives are enjoying a long weekend having only worked three days this week. The USA Senate resumes their schedule on Monday, December 17, 2012 at 2 PM.

I am looking for legislation about the violence within our social culture, but, so far the only one I found was this.

HR 2
An act to repeal the job-killing health care law and health care-related provisions in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.
S. 192 
Mr. DeMint A bill to repeal the job-killing health care law and health care-related provisions in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

There are many bills to reinstate provisions of the Patriot Act. Tell me something, how is it the Patriot Act doesn't stop the flow of guns into the population of the USA? Wouldn't those promoting the Patriot Act seek to undermine the availability of guns to terrorists? Hm. I guess not, considering there is all that export by pick-up truck load to Mexico.


S. 1050 Senator Paul - A bill to modify the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and to require judicial review of National Security Letters and Suspicious Activity Reports to prevent unreasonable searches and for other purposes.


S.J. Res. 13 Mr. Paul - Joint resolution declaring that a state of war exists between the Government of Libya and the Government and the people of 
the United States, and making provision to prosecute the same.

Senator Whitehouse is trying to limit some military counterfeit goods. Don't know what that is all about. It would be nice if assault weapons were banned, too. Assault weapons are military, counterfeit or not doesn't really matter, does it?


S. 1228 Mr. Whitehouse and others - A bill to prohibit trafficking in 
counterfeit military goods or services.

This one has merit. It all depends what the definition of corruption is.


S. 401 Mr. Leahy and others - A bill to help Federal prosecutors and investigators combat public corruption by strengthening and clarifying the law. 


When legislators are this stupid and defy federal law, the country knows there are some states just not trustworthy.

This isn't surprising, North Carolina doesn't even value human life and have exonerated any Emergency Room Physicians from liability with deaths of human beings that occur there. It is corruption through and through in that state.

Why should they be trusted with States Rights when they do nothing but use them for unworthy purposes. Those that seek to threaten habitat of endangered species need to be prosecuted and imprisoned.

When hunting is allowed within protected habitat of an endangered species it is illegal. It needs to stay illegal and no state law should ever be tolerated when it loosens those prohibitions.

...Since 1987, (click here) 66 have died as the result of gunshots, with more than half the deaths occurring in the past six years, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. That number does not include suspected gunshot deaths, including the three most recent ones.
Today, biologists estimate that between 115 and 130 red wolves exist in the wild - all of them in a five-county area on the Albemarle Peninsula of North Carolina.
The Fish and Wildlife Service, which oversees a red-wolf recovery program, is investigating the latest deaths. Anyone convicted of killing a red wolf - protected under the federal Endangered Species Act - faces up to a year in prison and $100,000 in fines....

This is there natural habitat, but, last time I looked into the number of US Fish and Wildlife Agents there were THREE. Only three agents in the entire state. Basically, this is poaching. If North Carolina can't be trusted to stop this degradation of the number of an endangered species then US Fish and Wildlife should beef up their personnel and/or seek a safer haven for them until their numbers increase. 

Maybe a protected preserve further west along the same latitude. Some place without drought. Start two populations, but, genetic test the transplants to insure they won't be deeply inbred.

Most states have their own threatened and endangered lists as well as the federal lists. The only protected species in North Carolina are the ones important to hunting. If a species can't be hunted for food or profit they don't belong alive on any state threatened or endangered list. No lie. There are absolutely no state lists for threatened and endangered plants. None. And there are plenty that should be protected. There are some conservatories in the state that do protect plants, but, there numbers are few.

There is extremely little moral content to the state of North Carolina. The only morality any elected official recognizes is 'church affiliated morality.' What ever it might be. Maybe the churches need to take up the future of all creatures great and small if their children are to value life at all; Lord knows even children's lives are valued in emergency rooms there.

I am quite confident the entire Souuuuth has the same dynamic. They hate the federal government. Sometimes the way they want to war all the time, they actually hate life.

The emergency room physician law is a human rights violation. There are plenty in North Carolina. Plenty. The way people are treated by employers and their susceptibility to homelessness and poverty. Human Rights violators. Why would the federal government ever, ever expect them to respect federal law in relation to Red Wolf habitat?

Rove was counting on purchasing the elections so the IRS rules could be changed to allow his non-profit status.


I am sure in his demented thinking the idea his political activities is somehow a public service. If the GOP could purchase elections with enough monies, they could change the federal rules to suit them. No surprise here. Rove can proceed as a non-profit as long as his application is pending. However, I thought there was a sundown provision of six months to a year for that, too.
by Kim Barker 
ProPublica
Dec. 14, 2012, 10:19 a.m.
In a confidential 2010 filing, Crossroads GPS (click here)-- the dark money group that spent more than $70 million from anonymous donors on the 2012 election -- told the Internal Revenue Service that its efforts would focus on public education, research and shaping legislation and policy.
The group's application for recognition as a social welfare nonprofit acknowledged that it would spend money to influence elections, but said "any such activity will be limited in amount, and will not constitute the organization's primary purpose."
Political insiders and campaign-finance watchdogs have long questioned how Crossroads, the brainchild of GOP strategist Karl Rove, had characterized its intentions to the IRS.
Now, for the first time, ProPublica has obtained the group's application for recognition of tax-exempt status, filed in September 2010. The IRS has not yet recognized Crossroads GPS as exempt, causing some tax experts to speculate that the agency is giving the application extra scrutiny. If Crossroads GPS is ultimately not recognized, it could be forced to reveal the identities of its donors....