…for my country and the men and women that defend it.
I hope this holiday was a time of reflection as what is important in life, including a safe and plentiful Earth.
Good night.
This Blog is created to stress the importance of Peace as an environmental directive. “I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it’s hell.” – Harry Truman (I receive no compensation from any entry on this blog.)
…for my country and the men and women that defend it.
I hope this holiday was a time of reflection as what is important in life, including a safe and plentiful Earth.
Good night.
He brings back into focus all the adverse baggage that adheres to him. Trump and his minions are about money, never about governance. So, when they act as consultants they are making money and the governance that results is ungovernable as demonstrated in the USA with out of control everything. They deregulate and stand back to let chaos prevail.
...First, “ethnic minorities” (click here) in the United States and Central and Eastern Europe are not comparable. To stick with the Hungarian example, there are approximately 2 million ethnic Hungarians who live in Hungary’s neighbor countries whose mother tongue is Hungarian. They became citizens of these states as a result of the border changes after the two world wars, including some 150,000 ethnic Hungarians in Subcarpathia. The borders moved, not the people. My great-grandfather, for instance, was born in 1919, and was the citizen of five different states without leaving his village in today’s South Slovakia where his ancestors lived for centuries.
In contrast, American minorities, with the exception of African Americans, the Native American population and Hispanics living in the Southern states, became minorities as a result of their own decision by immigrating to the U.S. Therefore, it is a legitimate expectation that they adjust to the norms of their chosen homeland and use the English language in public relations, and even then, non-English languages are often accommodated. But forbidding people to use their mother tongue in their own homeland, just because it came under the authority of a different state due to geopolitical events, is a whole different ballgame.
Second, one of the hardest lessons learned from the 20th century is that the stability of multiethnic Eastern Europe is contingent upon the protection of the rights of national minorities. The most fundamental of such rights, having long-standing traditions in Central and Eastern Europe, including Ukraine, is the opportunity to be educated in the mother tongue.
This, of course, does not mean that national minorities in Ukraine, for example, are refusing to learn or speak the official state language. There is a mutual understanding that every citizen, regardless of their mother tongue, must properly speak Ukrainian. However, the new Ukrainian legislation, instead of improving the quality of teaching Ukrainian for ethnic minorities, poses a serious threat to the very existence of national minorities in Ukraine.
Third, Hungary has a special bond to ethnic Hungarians living beyond its borders — just like other countries in Central and Eastern Europe. The well-being of these communities, including ethnic Hungarians in Subcarpathia, has always been important for Hungary. This is, in fact, not only the priority of the current government but also an obligation under its Fundamental Law dating back to the country’s independence.
Since taking away the most fundamental language rights of the community is a clear violation of this principle, Hungary’s reaction was quite foreseeable. All actors in the region were aware of this sensitivity, Ukraine knew that its move would strike a nerve in Budapest.
Here we come back to Russia, which is a key player of the dispute....
Any movement even distantly affiliated with Russia must be identified and denounced. Venezuela is a prime example of the dangers of silence in identifying the dangers.
The entire language focus in this Washington Times article is exactly from the Russian playbook.
According to Vladimir Putin, Russia is the only aggrieved country in the world and this dialogue is supposed to be proof of the leadership that really cares about the people and their country when in fact Putin seeks control over land and people for his own purposes. Freedom and healthy economics is the last on the list of these leaders. The current wars Putin is engaging in with his economic alliance is proof there is no free choice or peace on his agenda. Putin wants to build strength by conquering people and pressing them to obey with nationalism as his banner and language as his tool.
For those remaining in Ukraine there is a personal level of energy generation. Solar panels and batteries. The personal and portable solar panels can recharge batteries that can be used when night falls.
Rooftop panels can be installed for larger batteries. The rooftop panels might open the building up to drones and bombs, but, smaller, portable varieties can go undetected allowing greater safety.
That and subzero sleeping bags will work for the Ukrainians that refuse to surrender to these horrific and genocidal attacks by Russia.
Russia and its few allies are engaged in a multi-front war. Until Russian leadership changes and decides their tyranny is a human rights issue there is little hope for significant reprieve.
Starve the beast that is Russia and bring about an end is the only real hope for the world. It is a horrible country and cannot be allowed to continue it’s march to greater human suffering.
What type of explosives were found? It may not be Russia.
The pipelines were 80 to 110 meters or 250 to 400 feet down. That requires undersea drones. At 100 feet down divers only have 15 minutes before they begin their assent. Setting the explosives required sophisticated equipment.
What does satellites say about ship movements before the explosions.
It easily could be Russia, but, there maybe other evidence.
This is the original Affirmative Action decision.
...In a 5-4 opinion delivered by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor (click here), the Court held that the Equal Protection Clause does not prohibit the Law School's narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body. The Court reasoned that, because the Law School conducts highly individualized review of each applicant, no acceptance or rejection is based automatically on a variable such as race and that this process ensures that all factors that may contribute to diversity are meaningfully considered alongside race. Justice O'Connor wrote, "in the context of its individualized inquiry into the possible diversity contributions of all applicants, the Law School's race-conscious admissions program does not unduly harm nonminority applicants."
In the oral arguments on that page Clarence Thomas asks no questions. Justice Scalia chimes in a few times, but, never Thomas.
Besides Thomas none of the original Justices that rendered the opinion are on the court. Thomas is the only original judge. Thomas also brings a lot of religious bias to his decisions, but, in this article even the Catholics are questioning his decision about Affirmative Action.
...So it is not a surprise that Thomas, (click here) a celebrated member of the conservative Catholic community made the connection in his concurring opinion about the Indiana abortion law. He noted the origins of eugenics (click here) as a scientific and academic discipline, explaining that "leaders in the eugenics movement held prominent positions at Harvard, Stanford, and Yale, among other schools, and eugenics was taught at 376 universities and colleges."
Whatever the truth to the claims that abortion policy and jurisprudence are rooted in eugenic ideas, it is clear that eugenics itself is contrary to Catholic morals and social teaching. And it could be easily grasped why a Catholic justice would be concerned about the mischief that eugenic thinking in policy and medicine could do in a system that is not properly inoculated against it.
Which is why it was surprising to hear him take the opposite position to modest anti-racism policies in recent oral arguments for cases challenging affirmative action.
On Oct. 31, the Supreme Court heard two different cases challenging affirmative action. One case involves affirmative action in a public university, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina, and the other in a private university, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College.
During oral arguments in the North Carolina case, Thomas questioned the educational benefit of racially diverse schools: "...
This is the first time in half a century that NASA has flown a rocket powerful enough to send humans beyond low Earth orbit.
The flight was delayed after two attempts in late August and early September, which were cut short owing to hardware problems, including leaks of liquid hydrogen fuel. NASA then passed on a launch opportunity in late September because of an approaching hurricane, before putting it back on the launch pad, where it experienced high winds and rain from a different storm last week. NASA managers say that storm caused only minor damage to the rocket, including peeling off a strip of caulking that they say will not endanger the launch....
Don't try to understand all the jargon, just sit back and watch.