Saturday, May 27, 2006

Innuendo, a variety of tastes?



It's Saturday Night

Is it a misinterpretation? A misunderstanding? Or a vital aspect to exploitation of law?

Who is served by the 'innuendo' that exists in today's courts?

The citizens?

The opportunist criminals?

Or an exploitation of dominance of a social culture?

A prime example is the continued insistance of the question, are Gays citizens, are they people with perferences allowed by society or are they abberations a society has to tolerate?

I am concerned about not only environmental law, but, the 'slippage' of the treatment of human beings that begins with the scapegoating of a social class, be it Gay, Poor or Hispanic. The way law is practiced at the highest levels of government is not only incompetent. It is dangerous. We expect too much from 'morals' and need to protect ourselves from it through broad interpretations of Civil Rights vs. Victim Creating avenues of exploitation and social regress.

Posted by Picasa