The crowd laughed when he stated, "We really need this as the first question." What is wrong with that? He made a choice. Either argue with the laughable man or let him finish and provide an answer. No one understands that is what occurred?
If a person doesn't understand that is what occurred then the problem is with you and not Donald Trump. The answer he gave was a neutral answer and it was legitimate. He will be looking at many things and he does not have intelligence information at this point in his candidacy. What is strange about that? The strangeness belongs with the questioner and not the response.
Why do nothing but argue during the entire time he had set aside for questions? The man was laughable, that isn't enough?
If a person doesn't understand that is what occurred then the problem is with you and not Donald Trump. The answer he gave was a neutral answer and it was legitimate. He will be looking at many things and he does not have intelligence information at this point in his candidacy. What is strange about that? The strangeness belongs with the questioner and not the response.
Why do nothing but argue during the entire time he had set aside for questions? The man was laughable, that isn't enough?
