General Dempsey Mr. Ryan? That is not a 'misspoken' word, it was a huge mistake. Being called on the carpet by General Dempsey is not a misspoken word.
Posted at 11:15 AM ET, 04/01/2012
There is no such thing as 'personal sovereignty.' And Gingrick is not dropping out.
Sovereignty is the quality of having supreme, independent authority over a geographic area, such as a territory.
This is where the Republicans find all their rhetoric. This where they assault women as if they bodies were legal tender for population growth. NOT!
The Republicans covet PRIVACY RIGHTS as if they belong to the state whenever it is convenient. This is where rhetoric is born for those that believe the USA has to be God's Sovereign authority.
Posted at 11:15 AM ET, 04/01/2012
Paul Ryan says he ‘misspoke’ on military budget (click here)
By Ed O'Keefe
House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) said Sunday he misspoke last week when discussing the military budget.
“I really misspoke,” Ryan said during an appearance on CNN’s State of the Union.
“Yeah, I totally misspoke,” he said later on ABC’s This Week.
At issue were comments Ryan made Thursday regarding the military budget. “We don’t think the generals are giving us their true advice,” he said at an event hosted by National Journal. “We don’t think the generals believe that their budget is really the right budget.”
In response, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey said he stood by his testimony on the Pentagon’s spending request....
Sovereignty is the quality of having supreme, independent authority over a geographic area, such as a territory.
This is where the Republicans find all their rhetoric. This where they assault women as if they bodies were legal tender for population growth. NOT!
The Republicans covet PRIVACY RIGHTS as if they belong to the state whenever it is convenient. This is where rhetoric is born for those that believe the USA has to be God's Sovereign authority.
Kent Bush: Gingrich could save some dignity by dropping out (click here)
By Kent Bush
GateHouse News Service
Posted Apr 01, 2012 @ 05:15 PM
Remember when Newt Gingrich was the hot, new thing?
Not in 1974 and 1976, when he was losing congressional races in Georgia. Not even in 1978, when he finally won that seat. Not even in 1994, when he became the first Republican Speaker of the House in 40 years.
Newt was hot recently. Of course, so were Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry and Herman Cain. It wasn’t that long ago that pundits were debating whether Cain would be willing to serve as Perry’s vice president. Time flies when you’re running for president....
The USA provides legal standing to privacy and within that privacy are 'issues of choice.' That choice includes marriage or no marriage, children or no children, education beyond the age of minority, religious practices and personal pursuits of happiness.
The Republican Rhetoric that chronically attacks recognition of 'stare decisis' of the Burger court is their mainstay of which they cannot achieve goals to their electorate. The frustration of the Republican 'base of all bases' are the charismatic holdings of the Social Conservative like Palin, Perry, Bachman and Cain. These folks are convinced 'if only they could' gain control of the country and legislatively instill the values that would reduce the cost of government to as near zero as it can get; will make the country a better place to live.
Not. They are values based in greed.
As a country grows it demands more costs and not less. In 1776 there was a population in the USA of 2.5 million and the military was a militia of 'those that could.' In 2012, the USA has spread its military over the entire globe.
That is growth of people and expenses incurred by the government. When the Tenth Amendment was written to the USA Constitution the country was different. There are 27 amendments to the USA Constitution BECAUSE the USA has changed over the centuries of its existence. As the country grew and our society developed our personal lives changed, life became easier and we prospered.
Undoing the USA Constitution by destroying privacy rights, rolling back Amendments to the USA Constitution is regressive and unrealistic, but, when a Republicans makes the claim their 'ideology' is based in Constitutional Law it makes their political ranting appear legitimate.
If I could remove all the Amendments from the USA Constitution, disregard all the changes the USA went through including the fear of a President that would become a king, the face of the USA would be very different. That is ideology and not based in reality.
Today, Newt Gingrick stated he believed in 'personal sovereignty.' That is rhetoric, it has no place in democracy and increases intolerance of others. It is oppressive and divides a country.
The Republican Party needs to reclaim their identity, but, if they did it would look very much like the Democratic Party and if you listen to all the Republicans theologians IN ORDER TO HAVE A PARTY AND WIN there have to be complete opposites and dividing lines so voters know exactly what they are getting.
The chances Republicans will come away from extremism is unrealistic. The reality the Republican Rhetoric is based in greed of primarily, Corporate and Nouveau Riche, explains all the more why their base is intact. Romney is embracing all the extremists and have from the beginning of his campaign. The GOP is well mired in wealth and they aren't going anywhere no matter how PANDERING they are to those that are not extremists.
If the GOP wants others to embrace them, they have to do so in real legislative matters that reassure Americans of their futures and not in the insecure reality one isn't riding the "Republican Government Bubble."
The USA provides legal standing to privacy and within that privacy are 'issues of choice.' That choice includes marriage or no marriage, children or no children, education beyond the age of minority, religious practices and personal pursuits of happiness.
The Republican Rhetoric that chronically attacks recognition of 'stare decisis' of the Burger court is their mainstay of which they cannot achieve goals to their electorate. The frustration of the Republican 'base of all bases' are the charismatic holdings of the Social Conservative like Palin, Perry, Bachman and Cain. These folks are convinced 'if only they could' gain control of the country and legislatively instill the values that would reduce the cost of government to as near zero as it can get; will make the country a better place to live.
Not. They are values based in greed.
As a country grows it demands more costs and not less. In 1776 there was a population in the USA of 2.5 million and the military was a militia of 'those that could.' In 2012, the USA has spread its military over the entire globe.
That is growth of people and expenses incurred by the government. When the Tenth Amendment was written to the USA Constitution the country was different. There are 27 amendments to the USA Constitution BECAUSE the USA has changed over the centuries of its existence. As the country grew and our society developed our personal lives changed, life became easier and we prospered.
Undoing the USA Constitution by destroying privacy rights, rolling back Amendments to the USA Constitution is regressive and unrealistic, but, when a Republicans makes the claim their 'ideology' is based in Constitutional Law it makes their political ranting appear legitimate.
If I could remove all the Amendments from the USA Constitution, disregard all the changes the USA went through including the fear of a President that would become a king, the face of the USA would be very different. That is ideology and not based in reality.
Today, Newt Gingrick stated he believed in 'personal sovereignty.' That is rhetoric, it has no place in democracy and increases intolerance of others. It is oppressive and divides a country.
The Republican Party needs to reclaim their identity, but, if they did it would look very much like the Democratic Party and if you listen to all the Republicans theologians IN ORDER TO HAVE A PARTY AND WIN there have to be complete opposites and dividing lines so voters know exactly what they are getting.
The chances Republicans will come away from extremism is unrealistic. The reality the Republican Rhetoric is based in greed of primarily, Corporate and Nouveau Riche, explains all the more why their base is intact. Romney is embracing all the extremists and have from the beginning of his campaign. The GOP is well mired in wealth and they aren't going anywhere no matter how PANDERING they are to those that are not extremists.
If the GOP wants others to embrace them, they have to do so in real legislative matters that reassure Americans of their futures and not in the insecure reality one isn't riding the "Republican Government Bubble."
