Friday, May 28, 2010

There is absolutely nothing wrong with adding 'perks' to a House members position to keep him in a seat he may be disenchanted with.

He should have luck in running for Senate and if Sestak is playing up the rhetoric surrounding this issue, it is because he is trying to enamor himself with an image that will win him a Senate seat.

For all Bill Clinton knew, it was what he wanted and simply asked if that would change his idea of leaving the House for the Senate.
Sorry, the Right Wing Media screws up again.

It is about that time of year, right?  Last year it was the Health Care Bill and how there were 'Death Panels.'  This year it is about Sestak and his ambition beyond anything the Democratic Party could satisfy him with.

Same old lies from the Right Wing.  I am sure no such activity ever took place with Bush and Cheney.

Sure.

End of discussion.

...The report of the exchanges by Bauer (click title to entry - thank you) concluded that nothing improper had taken place and that "allegations of improper conduct rest on factual errors and lack a basis in the law."
Bauer found that, contrary to allegations by many conservative pundits, Sestak had not been offered the position of Secretary of the Navy. Bauer concluded that discussions about "alternatives" to a Senate campaign by Sestake were proper...

I am sure Rahm was being his usual self and stated, "Bill, will you please talk to this guy and see what his problem is with his move to run for Senate.  Maybe he needs more of a challenge in the House or something."

Thanks, Rahm, we all really needed that.