Sunday, August 24, 2014

The New York Times validates police abuse.

Michael Brown Jr.'s Body (Please click here, thank you)

The police methodology has taken on a very different definition when there is a police shooting. Police now act as soldiers when they fire their weapons as they kill citizens.

When soldiers take aim at an enemy they are not thinking about reviving him/her. At the very best they are hoping to take a POW for information and survival. The real definition of war is not sincerely about killing, it is about winning. It is why the President of the USA is required to have a strategy as Commander and Chief. However a war is waged the definition is about winning not necessarily killing. So, in the purest sense of the word, Homeland police are bringing war to the streets of the USA beyond that of what the US military is required.

When a police officer has successfully 'dropped' a citizen to the ground by the use of a gun OR OTHERWISE, including Tazer or fists; their first thought of course is their own safety, but, that has to immediately be followed by calling 911 and beginning CPR and First Aid. 

In the case of Michael Brown after the officer decided to fire his weapon for no real reason at all, his next act should have been to run to his side and prevent him from dying. That should have occurred in New York City and in Sanford, Florida. But, that is not happening. When homeland police and armed citizens are using their weapons they are intending to kill as if they were on the hunt for 'human game.' 

There is a great deal of difference in firing a gun to prevent attack and killing. By using a 'kill' methodology within any gun violence one has to bring to the forefront of the discussion the fact this is 'eliminating' people, reducing population and limiting outcomes in the country. It is silly to think about that with more than 300 million people in the USA, but, it is a valid point of view.