Wednesday, November 21, 2012

The NLRB should have a process to examine directives of management.

In the case of Hostess, as soon as the debt load to the company increased without a basis of improving their market share or other valid reasons there is probably a process to invoke through the NLRB. 

The motives in the case of Hostess was to liquidate the company and destroy the union. There needs to be a way to impose a review of management practices that will adverse the USA sovereign economy and the rights for unions to exist in longevity.

Along with that management should be a review of union practices as well to be sure they are benevolent to their membership. Not to impose rollbacks, but, simply a review of practices for the longevity of the union. If unions want to examine management priorities for union longevity it is only fair to provide the NLRB with reassurances the union is capable of longevity with benevolence to their members.

A sovereign nation with an economy based in capitalism principles relies on taxes to pay for its operations, military and otherwise. If a private sector can carry on by destroying companies to liquidate their assets and provide huge returns to investors, it is an assault on this nation.

Companies are given every reason to exist in the USA. They are provided breaks by local governments in many instances so they build and stay in operation to provide a way of life to their citizens. 

When companies close down they contract economies and reduce tax bases. There has to be a way of handling this through the NLRB. Has to be.