Wednesday, March 30, 2016

I find some real inconsistencies about this story.

The only party where infidelity is penalized is the Democratic Party. While the RNC will be exposed, it won't care and neither will the Republican primary voters. As a matter of fact while the media rages on about such scandals, the Republicans suddenly become silent.

March 28, 2016
By Steven Nelson
A lawyer who represented (click here) the so-called “D.C. madam” says he has phone records that could influence the outcome of the presidential election, and he’s threatening to release one or more names on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court if he’s denied a hearing on his right to distribute them.
Montgomery Blair Sibley, the late madam Deborah Palfrey’s colorful attorney, has been subject to a restraining order since 2007 barring him from releasing the information, which he says includes 815 names, addresses and Social Security numbers of Verizon Wireless customers.
“Time is of the essence because people are casting votes in primaries and caucuses,” he says. “I believe this information is relevant to that political discourse.”...

The DC Madam carried on a business as "Pamela Martin and Associates" starting 1995 through at least 2006. I don't think speculation is the correct thing to do. 

To begin Ms. Palfrey is not here to speak to any accuracy of a newly released documents of phone records. I also am disgusted at that reality. She wasn't a hardened criminal. Her emotional stability when the phone records went out was never questioned and as a result she hung herself. She's dead and Vitter has gone on untouched by his escapades. There is something very wrong with that.

There is a huge statement about sexism in the reality she is dead. But, that is what it is and now there is going to be more speculation and records. She knew it was sexist. That is why she provided "The John/Jane Phone Number List." It is the women that always pay the price for prostitution. No one dare prosecute Vitter, did they? They didn't even prosecute for prostitution, it was extraneous charges that imprisoned her for six years. Everyone of her customers went untouched.

This is the epage that contains downloadable documents (click here).

I find it strange this should be an issue this far into the primary process. The RNC or DNC are this desperate to remember "Ah, ha, Bush prosecuted that woman with the phone records." What I find strange is that Deborah Palfrey published the records to let the media learn of who might be at the end of those phone records. Now, there are more records that are damning of a presidential candidate? Really? How is it the phone records are so definitive now opposed to the fact the the media was needed before?

Those are very old phone records and there is the FACT most Americans have mobile phones that may or may not be the same. There are decade old or older phone records? Really? It doesn't make sense. Deborah Palfrey is dead. The records still live? There are too many questions for me to be speculative.

Speculation could be expensive.