Friday, April 03, 2015

Why would an aggrieved population insist on unnecssary laws?

Article V
The Congress, (click here) whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate. 

You understand them, I don't. They are some of the most bizarre people in the USA. Somehow Immigration Reform can be analogized by a car in need of a mechanic. Go figure. I guess Evangelicals have a lot of broken down cars.

It is anyone's guess why they think the can covet the USA Constitution because of some stupid analogy about the LGBT community.

By Leith Anderson

...If your car is out of gas (click here) and has a dead battery and a flat tire, it won't help to solve one problem. You need a comprehensive approach.

Let's take the word out of policy and politics and into a discussion with your mechanic. The two of you are standing in his shop next to your broken car. It's obvious that it won't run and the mechanic explains why: out of gas; dead battery; flat tire; lost key. You are concerned about the cost but really need the car to get to work every day. "If I fixed only one or two of the items on the list, which would you recommend?" The mechanic replies: "If you fix just two, your car will still be broken. For it to run right, you need to fix them all." "Well," you suggest, "suppose we start with a gallon of gas. That's the cheapest and easiest. We'll deal with the others next year."...


Anderson is the President of the National Association of Evangelicals. He covets the USA Constitution as if it is his to change. They are strange people.

You know the hideousness of the APPLICATION of this faith to covet the government is stupid. If the President of this organization has to bring the word in analogy about a broken down car what does that say about his followers? Seriously. This is not an intelligent discussion from a President of a religious organization.

Immigration Reform is about people. People are cars? Like what? This is the President of the organization that wants people to throw every Undocumented out of the country. He is strange.  

Then these people want to run the country? No flyin' way. There is a separation between church and state and they need to appreciate that.  

Can you imagine the zealots that would come out of the woodwork once they realized they can control the USA Constitution because they have the money to do it. The Founding Fathers (there were no women signing the US Constitution - that is an important thing to note) knew what they were doing when major changes to the Constitution has to surmount three-fours of the states.  

It gives me nightmares to realize men elected to the federal government and then posture themselves in a Governor's seat to prepare for a run for the Presidency subverts a federal law that would cause victimization of classes of people. I still can't believe the Robert's Court has cut into the freedom of people by oppressing the vote. Nightmares. They are nightmares. 

They have no morals. None. And their identity is suppose to be holy because of their fidelity and priority to their children. 

January 16, 2014
By Jennifer Glass, Ph.D.

Why (click here) are divorce rates higher in religiously conservative “red” states and lower in less religiously conservative “blue” states? After all, most conservatives frown upon divorce, and religious commitment is believed to strengthen marriage, not erode it. Even so, religiously conservative states Alabama and Arkansas have the second and third highest divorce rates in the U.S., at 13 per 1000 people per year while New Jersey and Massachusetts, more liberal states, are two of the lowest at 6 and 7 per 1000 people per year....

Why? Because of poverty, very deep poverty, alcoholism and drugs. That's why.

This is the USA poverty rate. The Evangelicals must be so proud, they have some of the most important work to carry out to stop the divorce rates and improve the lives and health of children. I am just wondering when they plan on getting started.