She says she is innocent and makes some very good statements to that effect. I haven't followed this in the media. Is that iconic to her guilt? Because there is nothing there. The word 'fucking' is suppose to make her guilty? Since when?
The family is very, very disfunctional. I sincerely believe the family was mounting a campaign to distract the authorities away from investing a greater truth.
I can't take them seriously. No one followed her to jail to support her though all this? Why not?
Sorry, but, none of this makes sense to me. They have a lost child and now an imprisoned mother and no one in the family, no boyfriend, no friend is at her side? And. No one knows the truth and is not at her side? Wow. That alone is an indication of dysfunction and a family that is not coping with their own reality in a way that makes sense.
I'll be honest, from this point on anything the family or friends have to offer in the way of 'evidence' is invalid. They were not at her side the entire time and her own mother was indicting her in the media after her arrest. There is something very wrong here.
In the statement Casey makes regarding the police investigation is fairly damning. The police did or did not state to her that she would be held responsible for Cayle's disappearance and/or death if she did not tell them where the child was? If that is true, that means she was being intimidated by the State to provide them with help in a way that is inappropriate.
I can understand how Casey would seek to reach out to someone, anyone that could find her bail or some relief from the reality she was facing. That would be especially true if she felt trapped, violated by her family and alone and/or helpless. That phone call doesn't mean anything to me in terms of Casey's guilt, it does mean something to me if a mother wanted to continue to look for her child or have authorities do so.
The only way a 'taped anything' would make a difference in a capital case is if there was a declaration of guilt witnessed in this manner and/or there was extensive evidence leading to the conviction revealed. I am NOT hearing any of that. I am hearing people 'opposing' each other in what 'the truth' is. They aren't seeking the truth, they are violating each other's trust to try to find it or defend from it.
The family is very, very disfunctional. I sincerely believe the family was mounting a campaign to distract the authorities away from investing a greater truth.
I can't take them seriously. No one followed her to jail to support her though all this? Why not?
Sorry, but, none of this makes sense to me. They have a lost child and now an imprisoned mother and no one in the family, no boyfriend, no friend is at her side? And. No one knows the truth and is not at her side? Wow. That alone is an indication of dysfunction and a family that is not coping with their own reality in a way that makes sense.
I'll be honest, from this point on anything the family or friends have to offer in the way of 'evidence' is invalid. They were not at her side the entire time and her own mother was indicting her in the media after her arrest. There is something very wrong here.
In the statement Casey makes regarding the police investigation is fairly damning. The police did or did not state to her that she would be held responsible for Cayle's disappearance and/or death if she did not tell them where the child was? If that is true, that means she was being intimidated by the State to provide them with help in a way that is inappropriate.
I can understand how Casey would seek to reach out to someone, anyone that could find her bail or some relief from the reality she was facing. That would be especially true if she felt trapped, violated by her family and alone and/or helpless. That phone call doesn't mean anything to me in terms of Casey's guilt, it does mean something to me if a mother wanted to continue to look for her child or have authorities do so.
The only way a 'taped anything' would make a difference in a capital case is if there was a declaration of guilt witnessed in this manner and/or there was extensive evidence leading to the conviction revealed. I am NOT hearing any of that. I am hearing people 'opposing' each other in what 'the truth' is. They aren't seeking the truth, they are violating each other's trust to try to find it or defend from it.