Friday, December 18, 2020

This doesn't do anything to the claims of the people of Flint if they oppose the settlement and the judge rejects it.

I haven't read the bill as to whether it negates claims without a judicial review, but, I don't think that would be part of it. It seems as though the state legislature has approved a loan program that allows Flint to start paying lawsuits whether a jury award or a settlement. It is a protection for the city as well.

The bill really needs to be read to understand the terms of the loan. It is probably a fair way to start to resolve the liability that is obviously the states'. I am sure the legislature doesn't see it that way, but, the former governor was directly responsible for the poisoning of the people of Flint and the state should carry the burden for any lawsuit against the city. Unfortunately, the city will probably be responsible for paying the loan back.

December 16, 2020
By Ron Fonger

Flint - Bills to allow the state to borrow $600 million (click here) to settle civil lawsuits related to the Flint water crisis have passed the Michigan House, requiring only a signature from Gov. Gretchen Whitmer to take effect.

The House voted 103-5 and 104-4 to pass the bills on Wednesday, Dec. 16, one week after the legislation passed the state Senate.

The bills would establish the Flint Settlement Trust Fund and allow borrowing for the settlement by the Michigan Strategic Fund....

Any medical or commercial distributors need to have deep freeze storage, but, also back-up power (sufficient battery or fueled generator) in case of power failure. We know Russia likes to seek out the power grid.