...When producers of products fail to warn of the dangers (click here) associated with the goods they produce, they should be held liable. Labeling on the product itself and written owners instructions must be clear and concise, and explain the dangers associated with the product, but it doesn’t stop there. Doctors are required to explain the risks associated with a treatment or procedure, that’s the law, but the manner in which the doctor conveys this warning and the way in which this is documented is left to the doctor’s discretion....
Why would a Supreme Court Justice do such a ridiculous thing? Why would he and four other Justices 'lean' in favor of corporations over the citizen/consumer? Why? Why would generic manufacturers be allowed greater freedoms than brand name pharmaceutical manufacturers?
This ruling came after The Citizens United decision.
The fact of the matter is there is a limit that can be done with pharmaceuticals to benefit wellness and treatment when it comes to the human body. These pharmaceutical manufacturers are not producing veterinary products that will expand their market. There isn't much to do there. So, with limited availability of discovering SAFE pharmaceuticals to BENEFIT the human condition, the largest manufacturers will be the generic drug manufacturers. So why not deregulate all the laws FROM THE BENCH (activist judges on the Supreme Court) so they can continue to make profits over the protections required that might bite into their stockholders 'take?'
The new cures? The new treatments? Oh, yeah. The USA is really behind the curve on this one. It is called GENETIC MEDICINE. Yep. That is basically what remains as a future for the pharmaceutical industry, not new medications.
Remember the fuss not long ago about extending 'patent rights' beyond seven years. How manufacturers were crying they were investing far more than they received in sales of their products? Ah-huh. You got it. Big Pharm has a lot of patents ending in the next decade and they are panicked.
So, the Activist Right Wing and Conservative Justices are scared for the profits they can throw to Wall Street in the near future. That is why Clarence Thomas has victimized citizens from his seat on the Supreme Court accompanied by four of his peers from the Robert's Court.
Why would a Supreme Court Justice do such a ridiculous thing? Why would he and four other Justices 'lean' in favor of corporations over the citizen/consumer? Why? Why would generic manufacturers be allowed greater freedoms than brand name pharmaceutical manufacturers?
This ruling came after The Citizens United decision.
The fact of the matter is there is a limit that can be done with pharmaceuticals to benefit wellness and treatment when it comes to the human body. These pharmaceutical manufacturers are not producing veterinary products that will expand their market. There isn't much to do there. So, with limited availability of discovering SAFE pharmaceuticals to BENEFIT the human condition, the largest manufacturers will be the generic drug manufacturers. So why not deregulate all the laws FROM THE BENCH (activist judges on the Supreme Court) so they can continue to make profits over the protections required that might bite into their stockholders 'take?'
The new cures? The new treatments? Oh, yeah. The USA is really behind the curve on this one. It is called GENETIC MEDICINE. Yep. That is basically what remains as a future for the pharmaceutical industry, not new medications.
Remember the fuss not long ago about extending 'patent rights' beyond seven years. How manufacturers were crying they were investing far more than they received in sales of their products? Ah-huh. You got it. Big Pharm has a lot of patents ending in the next decade and they are panicked.
So, the Activist Right Wing and Conservative Justices are scared for the profits they can throw to Wall Street in the near future. That is why Clarence Thomas has victimized citizens from his seat on the Supreme Court accompanied by four of his peers from the Robert's Court.