Monday, January 07, 2008

We don't belong in Iraq. We never did. Bush's surge killed more Iraqis and caused wide spread poverty with refugees in the millions.


Iraq War Carnage - When a country kills enough people in war, there is usually a weakening of will. The USA must leave Iraq.

Iraq death rate belies US claims of success (click here)
By Kim Sengupta
Published: 07 January 2008
The death rate in Iraq in the past 12 months has been the second highest in any year since the invasion, according to figures that appear to contradict American claims that the troop "surge" has dramatically reduced the level of violence across the country.
The research comes from Iraq Body Count (IBC), which has extensive experience of working in the country, and concludes that deaths outside Baghdad actually rose until September.
However, the group also concludes that the number of those killed in Baghdad, where the majority of American reinforcements for surge operations were deployed, has fallen significantly during the year.
IBC compiles its data from official sources, including the Pentagon, and found that between 22,586 and 24,159 civilian deaths were documented for 2007, with the vast majority of those killed between January and August.
The most lethal violence took place in Nineva, where the number of deaths rose by 143 per cent. Baghdad on the other hand saw a decline of around 39 per cent after a drastic fall in numbers of deaths in the last three months of the year.
The first eight months of 2007 also saw the highest number of car-bombings in the Iraq. The report claims that last year there were 20 explosive devices that killed more than 50 civilians, compared with 12 bombings in 2006.
The number of civilians killed during operations involving US forces in the past 12 months also rose, from between 544 and 623 in 2006 to between 868 and 1,326 in 2007. The report claims that most of these casualties were linked to air strikes, in which 88 children were reported to have died.
Around 900 US and 47 British troops have also been killed in the past year. General David Petraeus, the American commander in Iraq during the surge, insisted: " We are focusing our energy on building on what coalition and Iraqi troopers have accomplished in 2007. Success will not, however, be akin to flipping on a light switch." But John Sloboda, the co-founder of IBC, said the figures "show beyond any doubt that civil security in Iraq remains in a parlous state".
"For some 24,000 Iraqi civilians, and their families and friends, 2007 was a year of devastating and irreparable tragedy," he added.
Interesting? Click here to explore further

Why are they sending troops to Iraq? Longer occupation ?


Hawai'i Guard troops in the Christmas Day sortie were Sgt. Crisaron Voeuth, in copter doorway; Capt. Phoebe Inigo, third from left; and Sgt. Michelle Aina, in green gloves, waving a "shaka."
Hawai'i National Guard
And we are still sending National Guard Troops for lengthy deployments after occupying Iraq for nearly five years. Amazing. People actually voted for these men?

Jan 6, 2008
After 19th trip: Shays calls for 'reasonable' drawdown in Iraq
By Dave Natonski —Shays’ office
Congressman Christopher Shays, Republican of the Fourth District, who returned last week from his 19th trip to Iraq, said recently he believes the surge led by U.S. forces is working, but a withdrawal timeline is needed.
“The surge is working and better than expected. Support of tribal leaders has been a tremendous benefit to the ultimate success of our effort,” Mr. Shays said. “I believe many Iraqis are actually beginning to feel optimistic about their future. I believe, however, a timeline for U.S. troop drawdown is important to motivate the Iraq government to take bolder efforts to stabilize their country.”
Mr. Shays also renewed his recent recommendation that the Iraq Study Group “be re-engaged and have the opportunity to present its assessment and conclusions in conjunction with the report we will receive from General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker next year.”
After his trip, Mr. Shays wrote a letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates in which he said “Iraq is a different place from my 15th visit 12 months ago,” because of the success of the surge. A year ago, according to Mr. Shays, Iraq was ruled by a weak government under Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and the country was plagued by sectarian violence.
However since the surge, “attacks are declining, public markets are thriving, al Qaeda has been neutralized in al-Anbar, and major Shia militia groups have declared a tentative cease fire. Additionally, Iraqis complain less about past U.S. mistakes and make it clear they do not want us to leave precipitously,” Mr. Shays said.
As a result of the positive impact of the surge, a new opportunity exists “for the Iraqi people and their elected leaders to resolve political differences and set themselves on a course of economic and political recovery,” Mr. Shays said. “While I am optimistic about prospects for stability in Iraq, this country still has a long way to go.”
While calling for a timeline to “drawdown the bulk of our forces,” Mr. Shays urged a “safe and reasonable” approach. “Some Iraqis feel we will never leave while others believe we will leave too soon,” Mr. Shays said. “A responsible timeline will let both extremes know we will leave when Iraq is stable and able to maintain its own security.”
Mr. Shays made the following observations and recommendations to Mr. Gates:
• Observation: Some Iraqi refugees from Jordan and Syria are returning to Iraq. The impetus for this migration is based primarily on improvements in security. Lack of personal funds and visa restrictions are contributing factors for the influx. Return of Iraqis is a positive sign, however this relocation presents problems for some who find their homes occupied. Additionally, there is no plan to provide aid, shelter or other essential services to the large number of returning Iraqis.

• Recommendation: The Iraqi Government should request the assistance of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The Iraqi Government needs to establish a plan for receiving refugees, resolve differences concerning home ownership and provide needed aid.
• Observation: Our moral responsibility to the Iraqis who are at risk because they helped the United States is unquestionable. Having cooperated with the U.S. military, the United Nations or even with a nongovernmental organization can mean a death sentence. Many of the thousands of Iraqis, who worked as translators, drivers, even construction workers, live in fear of being targeted. Yet in April, the United States admitted only one refugee.
• Recommendation: We need to support House Resolution 2265, “Responsibility to Iraqi Refugees Act,” to address the ongoing humanitarian crisis. The bill creates a special program to admit to the United States Iraqis who are at risk.
• Observation: The Iraqi Army is becoming a combat force capable of independent operations. The training provided by the United States is enabling Iraqi forces to identify targets, clear areas and protect its citizens. There continues to be a major concern about their ability to care for the wounded, transport forces and supply the necessary equipment to units.
• Recommendation: The training the Iraqi Army has been receiving is outstanding and we should continue to do what we have been doing — teaching the skills necessary to fight their enemies and protect their citizens. We should more than double our efforts helping Iraqis develop logistical, medical and supply forces required to support their army. This will eventually allow Iraqi Security Forces to become self-sustaining and alleviate the United States of this responsibility.
• Observation: There has been a significant change for the better in performance of the local Iraqi police forces. They have been able to focus less on fighting terrorists and more on policing the streets, and fighting crime and corruption. This good news is offset by continued reports of corruption at the local level. Some police are receiving cash in exchange for protection. In many cases we have junior U.S. military personnel who do not have experience in law enforcement training Iraqi police recruits.
• Recommendation: Additional international police advisors need to be hired to train Iraqis and mentor them while they patrol neighborhoods. With this increase in trainers there will also be the need for additional interpreters to assist both U.S. and international trainers. While corruption will always be a problem, it can be minimized with professional training and monitoring police activity.
• Observation: Recently, Iraqi National Security Advisor Mowaffaq al-Rubaie said, ‘Permanent forces or bases in Iraq for any foreign forces are a red line that cannot be accepted by any nationalist Iraqi.’ In August, 2006 and again in August, 2007, I recommended, ‘The Iraqi Government announce it is beginning negotiations with the United States to define the U.S. military role in Iraq.’
• Recommendation: I again renew my recommendation of June 2007, that the U.S. Government begin negotiations over the status of American forces. We need to make it clear that our troop presence will be limited, similar to our role in Japan and South Korea.
• Observation: The number of violent acts throughout Iraq is declining. This decline is especially evident in the province of al-Anbar where there has been a 75% drop in attacks. The primary reasons for this positive development are: expanding cooperation from Sunni tribal sheikhs, increasing strength and professionalism of Iraqi Security Forces which is drawing, in part, their membership from local tribes; and the surge of U.S. forces.
• Recommendation: Now that the security situation in al-Anbar is becoming stable, the next and long overdue step is to stimulate economic activity. We need to capitalize on these developments in al-Anbar: encouraging the Iraqi Government to continue providing funds for infrastructure development; recommending private oil and gas exploration; and stimulating business development.
• Observation: Iran continues its attempts to influence events in Iraq by supporting a number of anti-Coalition groups. Some groups receiving Iranian support however, are now beginning to question Iran’s motives. Muqtada al-Sadr representatives from Sadr City told the Delegation, ‘We now call you [Americans] our brothers because we have uncovered the bad intentions of others.’
• Recommendation: I renew my Dec., 2006 recommendation to increase our dialogue with Iran. Iran needs to be convinced we will continue our support of a democratic Iraq, and that it is not in Iran’s interest to continue to be such a negative force in the region.
• Observation: Muqtada al-Sadr representatives have asked for help developing the Sadr City infrastructure, including a hospital to be built for the city and a partnership to be established between a college in Sadr City, and an American college.
• Recommendation: We should support the requests of Muqtada al-Sadr’s representatives by encouraging the Iraqi Government to provide additional funding for improving the infrastructure and building a hospital in Sadr City.
The U.S. Department of State should explore the idea of a college partnership between a United States college and a college in Sadr City — similar to those in Qatar and Jordan.
• Observation: Iraq is a viable country with a long history. It is the Fertile Crescent where two great rivers meet. While there is strong Sunni, Shia and Kurdish identity, there is intermarriage among sects, and many tribes include both Sunni and Shia.
• Recommendation: In order to maintain a viable country, American politicians must stop saying we should divide Iraq into parts. This is offensive to many Iraqis who feel the United States intention has always been to divide their country and take its oil. To help Iraq maintain its identity, the central government must be the primary source of revenue and ultimate arbiter concerning the distribution of funds to the provinces.
• Observation: Our delegation discussed the status of Southern Iraq with an international non-governmental agency (NGO) working in that area. Basra Province provided Baghdad nearly 90% of its budget this year from its oil revenues. There is a fight for control of this region between rival Shia militia groups and significant criminal activity. My first instinct is to encourage U.S. forces to become involved and help restore security in Southern Iraq, but I realize General Petraeus and his team are correct when they argue this is an Iraqi problem, not an American problem.
• Recommendation: Coalition forces should avoid being involved militarily in the dispute among Shia factions in the South. Our diplomats should continue to encourage the Iraqis to resolve their own differences among themselves and deal with the criminal activity.
• Observation: The U.S. Department of Defense Office of Business Transformation is helping reopen Iraqi industries shut down after the 2003 invasion. The benefit is well known; the more jobs for Iraqis, the fewer recruits available for insurgents.
• Recommendation: Because increasing employment within Iraq is among the best tools to prevent individuals turning to terrorism, we should increase funding for the DOD Office of Business Transformation to create sustainable jobs.
• Observation: Small projects managed by the U.S. Agency for International Development’s (USAID) private sector partners, such as Mercy Corps and International Relief and Development, under the Community Action Program are very successful in achieving development and creating jobs for Iraqis.
• Recommendation: I renew my recommendation of Oct. 2006, for USAID to increase its funding of the Community Action Program.”

Major Fire Damages Iraq's Biggest Oil Refinery


BAIJI, Iraq—An explosion at a fuel storage tank caused a huge blaze at Iraq's largest refinery on Monday, inflicting burns on at least 36 workers and killing three before being brought under control, witnesses said.
An engineer at Baiji refinery, some 180 km (110 miles) north of Baghdad, said the blast had destroyed the plant's liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) unit, where the fire had broken out, but other operations were unaffected.
A Reuters cameraman at the complex said he saw at least one dead body and had counted 36 others suffering from burns. Workers were evacuated as flames raged through the LPG unit.
A police official in Baiji said three people had been killed in the blaze—one engineer and two others whose bodies were charred beyond recognition.
Two hours after the blaze erupted, firefighters succeeded in bringing it under control, said the engineer, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity. He blamed the fire on an accident.
"There was no sabotage. It was caused by a technical fault," he said.
He said the LPG unit had been shut down for repairs and was coming back online on Monday when it was rocked by an explosion at 2.30 p.m. (1130 GMT) and then a second a few minutes later.
The initial explosion was at a storage tank containing 5 million litres of fuel.
Firefighters, Ambulances
"This is the biggest fire I have ever seen at Baiji refinery. We have not had a fire like this before," said the engineer, employed at the complex since 2003.
The engineer said he knew of one fatality and 24 injured. ...

Iraq bombs hit Sunni stronghold (click here)
Riyadh Samarrai's wife mourned by his coffin at a mosque A double bombing in Baghdad has killed at least 14 people, including the head of a US-backed armed group which fights al-Qaeda in Sunni Muslim areas.
Police say a suicide bomber struck at the entrance of the Sunni Endowment, or Waqf, office in Adhamiya district.
A second suicide attacker set off a car bomb a few metres away as people fled from the scene of the first explosion.
Riyadh Samarrai, leader of the Adhamiya Awakening group, also a Waqf employee, was killed along with his son.
The attacker is believed to be from among the more hardline Sunni insurgents who do not want reconciliation in Iraq, the BBC's Humphrey Hawksley reports.
Other bombs killed at least five people in Baghdad on Monday.
'Bomber's embrace'
One of Mr Samarrai's bodyguards told reporters the suicide bomber had walked up to the former police colonel and embraced him before detonating his explosives....
Fort Lewis soldier killed in Iraq; first death of 2008 (click here)
P-I STAFF
A Fort Lewis soldier was killed by a homemade bomb Saturday in Iraq -- the first death of 2008 in the war for a man or woman in uniform with links to Washington.
The Defense Department said Pfc. Jason F. Lemke, 30, of West Allis, Wis., was killed when the explosion struck his vehicle in Ibrahim Al Adham. He was with the 4th Stryker Brigade, which was sent to Iraq in April.
Fort Lewis said Lemke enlisted in the Army in 2004 and was sent to the Pierce County base in 2005.

This is a bit dated, but, is interesting to me from the realization of how right in prediction it was.

There is no 'creating' a difference in Middle East. It has to be by consensus and permission of those that hold the purse strings.

Persian Gulf time bomb: America's risky commitment
USA Today (Society for the Advancement of Education), May, 1997 by Barbara Conry
The bombing that killed 19 U.S. troops in Drahan, Saudi Arabia, was one consequence of the high-profile military presence in the region, and there is great potential for similar attacks in the future.
The 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait was a watershed in U.S. policy toward the Persian Gulf region. The American military response to that invasion was not a foregone conclusion--a fact that often is forgotten in light of the popularity of the Gulf War and the widespread support for follow-up operations against Saddam Hussein. There was intense debate about how the U.S. should respond. Richard Cheney, Secretary of Defense at the time of the invasion, has recalled that the Bush Administration "really needed some time to come to grips with this basic, fundamental question of our strategic assessment of what this meant. Did it matter that [Saddam Hussein had] taken Kuwait?"...



...Managing security in the volatile Persian Gulf region, however, is an expensive and high-risk strategy that is not justified by American interests. Current U.S. strategy is based on numerous flawed assumptions, is plagued by internal contradictions, and exhibits a potentially dangerous complacency about the risks associated with high-profile American involvement in the region. Moreover, the very tactics that are intended to safeguard U.S. interests may jeopardize those interests in the long run.
According to the May, 1995, United States Security Strategy for the Middle East, Washington has adopted a three-tiered approach to Gulf security. The first tier is strengthening national self-defense capabilities to allow each country to bear primary responsibility for its own defense. The second is promoting regional collective defense to enable states in the area to cooperate during periods of heightened regional tension. The third is enhancing the capabilities of the U.S. and, nominally, other states outside the region to repel major threats to the southern Gulf region.
In reality, though, Washington has made only modest, largely cosmetic, efforts to encourage the southern Gulf monarchies to develop national or regional self-defense consequences....

Do you know how many US Air Force Bases there are on the Persian Gulf? Too many.

Posted by Picasa
Northrup Grumann Aircraft

There are about 24 US Air Force Bases alone on the Persian Gulf. Do you know the size of the Persian Gulf?


The darnest thing is that several of them aren't even useful anymore.
The USA doesn't have a Northern or Southern No Fly Zone anymore and the Iraqi Air Force doesn't exist !!

Ahmed Al Jaber Air Base
28°56'05"N 47°47'31"E
Ahmed Al Jaber Air Base in Kuwait is a Kuwait air force installation with part designated for operations by the US Air Force and its allies. A camp sitting 75 miles south of the Iraqi border, Al Jaber's primary role is supporting Joint Task Force - Southwest Asia, which monitors a no-fly zone mission dubbed Operation Southern Watch. Active-duty, Guard and Reserve A-10 and F-16 fighter units, along with support individuals, rotate in and out, ensuring Iraqi aircraft don't fly below the 32nd parallel. At the Al Jaber AFB the 332 ELS Commander and 10 personnel are on a one-year tour; all others (1190 personnel) rotate every 90 days....

Al Dhafra Air Base, UAE
24°14'54" N 54°32'52"E
Al Dhafra Air Base in the United Arab Emirates is located about an hour outside of Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates. The 763rd Expeditionary Air Refueling Squadron [formerly designated the 4413th Air Refueling Squadron (Provisional)] conducts in-flight refueling missions throughout Southwest Asia in support of Operation Southern Watch, a coalition force tasked to monitor United Nations Security Council resolutions restricting air and ground operations in Southern Iraq. The Air Force operates KC-10 refueling planes which are involved in sustaining US warplanes covering the southern no-flight zone over Iraq....

Muharraq Airfield, Bahrain
Bahrain is the hub logistics site in the NAVCENT AOR for distributing all passengers and cargo and mail originating in CONUS. It is served by AMC for cargo and CAT-B missions coming from the east coast via the Mediterranean. Full transient services are available to personnel arriving in Bahrain.
Muharraq Airfield, Bahrain is a military compound within civil airfield adjacent to Al Manamah, the principal city in Bahrain. Navy Patrol Squadrons operate P-3 Orion aircraft from permanent detachment sites in Manama, Bahrain; Masirah, Oman; Kadena, Okinawa and Diego Garcia.
Three UC-12M are assigned to NSA Bahrain as the primary logistical asset for light cargo & passenger transport in FIFTHFLT AOR. The aircraft also provide VIP transportation in AOR....

Two Navy fighter jets crash in Persian Gulf, pilots eject safely


An F/A-18 Hornet taxies onto the catapult prior to launch during flight operations aboard the USS Harry S Truman.
Photo: AFP

Staff reporter
January 8, 2008 - 8:41AM
Two F/A-18 fighter aircraft from the US navy's fifth fleet have crashed in the Persian Gulf, further clouding the future of the Super Hornet's role in Australia's air strike force.
The crashes come as the Federal Government reviews all aspects of the program to update Australia's air force - including the contract to buy 24 Super Hornets as part of a $30 billion program to deliver air superiority in the region.
The US navy said that the fighters crashed "during operations" and three air crew were "in good physical condition" after ejecting from the fighters and being rescued by teams from the nuclear aircraft carrier USS Harry S Truman.
"The cause of the accident is under investigation," the navy said.
It said the aircraft were providing close air support from Iraq when they crashed....

Bush dismisses reports of Fifth Fleet relocation


This is the US Fifth Fleet. Bahrain wants them out of the area. I don't blame them. The entire Persian Gulf is dominated by USA warship traffic and I am confident it's over kill over there.
The USA has overstayed it's welcome.

By Habib Toumi, Bureau Chief
Published: January 05, 2008, 23:09
Manama: President George W. Bush has dismissed reports that the US would shut down its military facility in Manama and pull the Fifth Fleet out of Bahrain as "untrue."
"Bahrain is a very hospitable place for our Navy and other Armed Forces, and that in itself should be a signal to people that we view Bahrain as a stable, strong country, which is all part of tracking investment," Bush yesterday told a group of Arab journalists at a roundtable meeting at the White House.
Bush, who will be in Bahrain next Saturday and Sunday for the first time as president, said that he would inform King Hamad Bin Eisa Al Khalifa about the US appreciation of his country's contributions.
Bahrain, a major non-Nato ally, has been the headquarters of US naval activity in the Gulf since 1947. However, a 2004 order by US Central Command to 650 US military dependents to leave Bahrain on grounds of possible terror attacks has sparked concerns that the base would be relocated.
Although Pentagon officials have often insisted that the mandatory departure was not an evacuation but rather a "temporary relocation", the non-return of the military dependents has perpetuated speculation about the possible closure of the base.
"It won't take long for me to allay concerns about pulling the Fifth Fleet out of Bahrain. As a matter of fact, I'm looking forward to not only dealing with the Bahraini officials and His Majesty, of course, but to talk to our troops there in Bahrain. I'm looking forward to thanking them for their service to the country," Bush said.
Bush's entourage said that he would visit US troops at Camp Arifjan, near Kuwait City, and the US Naval Facility in Juffair, in the Manama outskirts. Qatar, where the US has a major military base, is not included in the trip.
Describing his forthcoming trip to the Middle East as "substantive", Bush said that he would use it to "talk to friends and allies about the US strong commitment to regional security" and to confirm that "the United States is engaged and will remain engaged in the security of the region."
Non-official aspects of the Bush trip include delivering a speech in Abu Dhabi about "progress of freedom in the region, emerging economic progress, and how regional security is important for both continued economic growth and for the spread of freedom." He will also hold a roundtable discussion on democracy and development with Kuwaiti women.

Where is that White Russian I was sipping? Hm. I think the cat drank it.


The brand spanking new Iranian Stealth Submarine. I hear tell, it was sitting right underneath the entire Fifth fleet while the war games were being conducted at the Strait of Hormuz.

What happened today, was the Iranians

'pulled one off' on the USA in a measure

to show it's might in war games at the

Straits of Hormuz.

That is all that happened today.

Nothing else, but, Iranian war games.

The USA got caught with it's pants

down for the incompetency of it's

Commander and Chief. We could

have lost three significant war cruisers

had the Iranians actually have pulled

off this incident. If instead of 'faux'

explosive mechanisms, there were real

ones, they would have sunk three

battleships.

This exercise was important to Iran

because of the nature of the

battleships and Bush's CHRONIC ranting

about the nuclear facility which we

already know does not produce

weapons.

Have you figured it out yet, boys and girls? Huh? Click here for technical information

Do you know what happened in the Persian Gulf today?

Besides nothing significant.

Do you know what actually happened?

And why there will be no war with Iran?

hint : I gave you all the clues in the world.

Enter stage right :: Vice Admiral Kevin J. Cosgriff. The plot thickens.


Vice Admiral Kevin J. Cosgriff, Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, Commander, U.S. 5th Fleet, Commander, Combined Maritime Forces

There is a USA Air Force Base at the Straits of Hormuz. Got that? A USA Airforce Base. That where the ships were under 'faux' seige.



I would fully expect a seaport near the Air Force Base considering it's THE PERSIAN GULF. Right? Water and all that.

Fujairah
25°07'N 56°20'E
Fujairah's prominence as a convenient 'bunker stop' was born out of the Iran/Iraq war in the mid 1980's. The only ship's entrance to the Gulf, through the Straits of Hormuz, was mined and tankers were also targeted by Iranian fire. Passage became restricted to US and Royal Navy protected convoys. Fujairah is in the outer Gulf, and as vessels queued up waiting to go through the strait in convoys, Fujairah came into its own with services aimed towards the waiting ships. After the Iran/Iraq war, Fujairah was well established as a popular anchorage for tankers waiting for employment in the Gulf.
The Fujairah to Jebel Ali land link is the Navy’s logistics pipeline to the Gulf should the Strait of Hormuz be closed.
The Fujairah bunker market incorporates the United Arab Emirates (UAE) ports of Khor Fakkan, Fujairah and the smaller and less known Kalba. Fujairah is situated between the two others, with Khor Fakkan to the north. These three ports, and more importantly their offshore sector in the Gulf of Oman, together constitute the Fujairah bunker market. The reason why three separate anchorages (Fujairah, Khor Fakkan and Kalba) are effectively part of one and the same market, is that the vast majority of bunkers in this area are delivered offshore in the Gulf of Oman. Fujairah itself seems to have outgrown its capacity and has been known to be a bit overcrowded, which has helped the anchorages of Kalba and Khor Fakkan gain popularity....

This is a very colorful map of the Persian Gulf. I think someone that graduated from No Child Left Behind colored in the dots.


The incident occured at the Strait of Hormuz. Did I spell that right? Hormuz. It's a narrow water way. There is a very interesting aspect about American national defense that occurs at that strait.
See, the media will talk about the 'entertaining' aspect of all this. You know the 'inflammatory' attention getting stuff, but, they don't talk about reality. I'm going to talk about reality.

Hamas is right. Bush wants to expand war. Hamas: Bush visit to Mideast is about Iran, not peace process



The USS Hopper travels with several other ships. They were with it today in the Persian Gulf. They were lucky they weren't destroyed. The USS Hopper is an Arleigh Burke Class Missile Destroyer. It carries Cruise Missiles and the like. They are there to see it that Bush has a full compliment of war machines while in the Persian Gulf. I don't know why else they were there. Certainly, Russia isn't going to mount an attack against Georgie while on a so called Peace Initiative.

They were in route to the Persian Gulf because Bush is vacationing there this week. Official White House statement calls it a Peace Mission. It's simply going through the motions of crony politics.

Briefly, Bush is an idiot. He could have lost three USA warships today in his arrogance and incompetence as Commander and Chief. Right now, Vladimir Putin is laughing his flying ass off over what happened today with Iran. I imagine he is laughing while sipping on a White Russian with his favorite general.

I'll explain.

It's Monday Night

The Games People Play by Hank Williams, Jr.

Oh the games people play now
Every night and every day now
Never meaning what they say now
Never saying what they mean
So they while away the hours
In their ivory towers
Till there covered up with flowers
In the back of a black limousine

Talkin bout you and me
And the games people play

Oh we make one another cry
Break our heart
Then we say goodbye
Cause our heart say
We hope to die
Let the other one to blame
Neither one will ever give in
So were gazing at an 8 by 10
Thinking bout the way
It might have been
Its a dirty, rotten, shame

Talkin bout you and me
And the games people play

People walking up to ya
Sayin glory, hallelujah
And they try to sock it to ya
In the name of the Lord
They gonna teach you
How to meditate
Read your horoscope
And cheat your faith
And furthermore to hell with hate
Come on and get on board

Talkin bout you and me
And the games people play

Look around tell me
What you see
Whats happening to you and me
God grant me the serenity
To remember who I am
Cause your giving up your sanity
For your pride and your vanity
Turn your back on humanity
And you don't give a damn

Talkin bout you and me
And the games people play...

I want to make certain we are all on the same page regarding the New Hampshire Primary. In regard to the NY Senator. It isn't Bill.



The 'thing' about Hillary is that she is probably better prepared to be President of the USA in many ways than any of her piers running against her. Certainly, her experience in foreign affairs is more extensive, however, she represents decisions of the past many people cannot move beyond. This is one of them.

I also don't believe her emotional speech today was made out of weakness regardless the rhetoric of others stating same. I believe Hillary sincerely means she is concerned for this country and believes there needs to be leadership in the White House to match the challenges the way she sees them. She is absolutely correct about many things and I have cited her on this blog in regard to same.

The war in Iraq was "W"rong and it is difficult today for many to condone her votes in favor of the war and continued spending.

The USA needs to leave Iraq. There is no threat to this country from Iraq even today and people there continue to die and suffer. There will be no war with Iran in the face of the circumstances today in the Persian Gulf and I'll prove to you why tonight.

The failure of Senator Clinton to win these primaries is completely due with her performance in the USA Senate regarding Iraq. She needs to make a complete and absolute commitment to disengage from the war in Iraq in order to find more support in the country among Democratic Constitutents. Bin Laden is in Pakistan. That is obvious. The Taliban are causing more problems and not less and they find support in Pakistan. So. Where is the 'real' war? Certainly not in Iraq.

Her commercial above points to reasons for sweeping change in the USA. She needs to make Americans feel comfortable with her ability to lead that change. The 'thing' is this. Will Obama be electable? Good question, because, while Code Pink was more than correct, there are many voting for Republican leadership that still believe in continuing the Iraq war.

The question is this. When it comes to voting in November of this year, will Democrats once again be sorry they didn't decide on a Centrist Democrat rather than one that tells them what they want to hear? The Right Wing has been waging war against Hillary Rodham Clinton for a reason for a long time now. One might want to ask why !!! Is Senator Obama prepared to win in November? Anyone have that answer?