It is one thing entirely for the USA Supreme Court to make a ruling that assails Privacy Rights for the purpose of National Security and then have that information misused for political reasons or commercial reasons. It is quite another thing to 'trend the law' to end Privacy Rights, especially in favor of commercial interests. That is exactly what the USA Supreme Court did with several cases in recent years.
The "San Francisco Chronicle" notes some of it here:
I don't care if there is a majority of decisions makers on the court that sees the USA consumer as less than a citizen when their privacy rights are concerned. This is impeachable as it is moving the law away from potecting the citizen in favor of 'financial interests of companies' and that is the way I see it, as a citizen in the USA for all my life. It is PROTECTIONIST court decisions and it abandons the rights of citizens.
The issue of the NRA is a separate entry.
In the article above it is stated by the US Chamber of Commerce that the court's record on business is mixed. But, the voting of those that vote to favor the Plutocracy is not. The decisions regarding 'immigration' when it comes to ILLEGAL business practices are very clear. Illegal immigration has always benefited business as it keeps down labor costs, obstructs unions from doing business and holds down the average wage in the USA. Any Supreme Court justice that would assail established immigration law to benefit dirt cheap labor would be easily impeachable. The four "Republican Fringe Justices" consistently oppose the citizen and the one Conservative Justice actually brings a 'thought process' to the decision making. That is the radicalized Right Wing Court as it exists today and it is 'anti-citizen' in favor of profiteers and plutocrats.
I thought economic policy was dominated by the legislature of the USA, not 'Lunatic Fringe Activist Judges from the Right Wing political party."
The "San Francisco Chronicle" notes some of it here:
I don't care if there is a majority of decisions makers on the court that sees the USA consumer as less than a citizen when their privacy rights are concerned. This is impeachable as it is moving the law away from potecting the citizen in favor of 'financial interests of companies' and that is the way I see it, as a citizen in the USA for all my life. It is PROTECTIONIST court decisions and it abandons the rights of citizens.
The issue of the NRA is a separate entry.
In the article above it is stated by the US Chamber of Commerce that the court's record on business is mixed. But, the voting of those that vote to favor the Plutocracy is not. The decisions regarding 'immigration' when it comes to ILLEGAL business practices are very clear. Illegal immigration has always benefited business as it keeps down labor costs, obstructs unions from doing business and holds down the average wage in the USA. Any Supreme Court justice that would assail established immigration law to benefit dirt cheap labor would be easily impeachable. The four "Republican Fringe Justices" consistently oppose the citizen and the one Conservative Justice actually brings a 'thought process' to the decision making. That is the radicalized Right Wing Court as it exists today and it is 'anti-citizen' in favor of profiteers and plutocrats.
I thought economic policy was dominated by the legislature of the USA, not 'Lunatic Fringe Activist Judges from the Right Wing political party."