But, to honor those determined to have a blue colored moon, there is this video.

Time stop 1:29 shows a blue colored moon. 

Congratulations.

This is an article from "Space.com" about the next time observers can see a Super Blue Blood Moon.

January 31, 2018
By Hanneke Weitering

Skywatchers (click here for article and video) around the world were treated to a rare Super Blue Blood Moon today (Jan. 31). While this was the first time in over 150 years that this particular type of eclipse has happened in the U.S., Americans can look forward to another "blood moon" eclipse coming on Jan. 21, 2019.

This next immediate total lunar eclipse — when the moon appears to turn red as it passes through Earth's dark inner shadow, or the umbra — will occur later this year on July 27. But that eclipse won't be visible from North America. However, much of the rest of the world — South America, Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia — will have a great view of that eclipse....

It is funny how disconnected people can be about having precise information.

I sometimes like to conduct reality checks with strangers when I know the facts are completely scientific and sound. So, yesterday I was at an appointment and there was another woman in the room and I said, "Did you see the Super Blue Blood Moon recently? 

She said she had and never saw any blue anything. So, in honor of the confused observer, I thought this was a very instructive video.

Same pattern of behavior. It is almost a routine now. No one ever knows exactly where the conflict of interest lies.

It is my opinion, the presidency of the USA is very valuable to Senior Trump and he creates a cloud of ideology around him that hides his personal agenda. I could have written the dialogue in addressing the meeting for the degree of predictable behaviour that occurs with him.

Whatever the political crisis or in this case legal crisis, his cover-up is always the same. Deny the allegations, bring up a cause of the people and blame the Democrats for the issue in the first place. It is always the same. Trump embattled has a singular method of cover-up and I am left to wonder what he gained personally out of his position as POTUS. Sometime in the future, it will all come out, but, only after the statute of limitations and/or contracts expire.


This cover-up is classic Trump. Putin might change his mind about Russian child adoption simply to bolster Trump's standing, but, the fact of the matter is Russia has greatly improved their child death rates.

The USA is off the list in Russia to receive children for adoption. The Russians have decided it is a better strategy to send pregnant women to the Trump properties to give birth on USA soil. Just to close this one loop the USA's child death rate is highest of 20 rich nations. Why? Guns. (click here)

A child age 15 to 19 in the U.S. is 82 times more likely to die from gun violence than such a child in the other countries.

So, if Putin decides he needs to CYA Trump about this meeting, he would be acting in hope of control of the Mueller investigation, not the best interest of the children of Russia.

The idea Trump can legally lie to the press is more than amusing, considering his frequent use of "Fake News." 

I wish Special Council and Former Director Mueller great success in his investigation, this isn't' an easy one. Finding the root cause of the investigation and validating it seems paramount to me. I would not expect much cooperation by Trump. Trump decided he would conduct his interview under oath. Bush and Cheney consented to discuss 911, but, only if there was no oath required.

The country needs you, Mr. Mueller. Please proceed.

January 31, 2018

By Jo Becker, Mark Mazzetti, Matt Apuzzo and Maggie Haberman

...The president supervised (click here) the writing of the statement, according to three people familiar with the episode, with input from other White House aides. A fierce debate erupted over how much information the news release should include. Mr. Trump was insistent about including language that the meeting was about Russian adoptions, according to two people with knowledge of the discussion.

By early afternoon, The Times received a separate statement, from Jamie S. Gorelick, a lawyer at the time for Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and senior adviser. The statement said little about the meeting, except that Mr. Kushner had “briefly attended at the request of his brother-in-law Donald Trump Jr.”

It left nearly all of the questions unanswered — and seemed to put the onus on Donald Trump Jr. to answer them. Nearly four hours later, the statement that had been cobbled together aboard Air Force One was sent to The Times. The statement was in Donald Trump Jr.’s name and was issued by Mr. Garten.

“It was a short introductory meeting,” it read. “I asked Jared and Paul to stop by. We primarily discussed a program about the adoption of Russian children that was active and popular with American families years ago and was since ended by the Russian government, but it was not a campaign issue at that time and there was no follow up.”

According to four people familiar with the discussions, Donald Trump Jr. had insisted that the word “primarily” be included in the statement....