When will the Moral actually lead Morally?

How do you define sexuality?

How do you define your sexuality?

How do you define gender identity?
Celibate? Heterosexual? Homosexual? Bisexual? Transgender?

How do you express the sexual side of your personality?

Is the sexual side of your personality ACTUALLY different than a well integrated personality?

Is sexual expression ever wrong?

Is being sexual a freedom that leads to higher awareness of your world?

Can a person experience life to it's fullest without understanding their own sexuality?

Should issues that surround gender identity even be addressed by a society in the manner of accepting gays and gay marriages? Are gay families possible? Are gay families okay for children? What if a child is born gay into a family of evangelicals?

When will 'the issues of guilt by religion' surrounding gender and sexuality no longer be ours? When will a church FINALLY lead in a moral manner that is 'in step' with the needs of it's flock regarding quality of life RATHER THAN just life?

Do the issues of the 'Culture of Life' smack cohesively across ALL definitions by all those that proclaim ownership of it?

Or.

Is the 'Cult-ure of Life' only a convenient form of harassment to drive people by guilt to leadership that expresses itself as 'guilt free' and 'self righteous' in it's virture, hence, elevating itself above the definition of 'reproachable?'

Europe Africa Satellite April 18, 2005. A lot more Global Warming Activity on this satellite. The equatorial air mass is in place. The heat conduit between South America and the Arctic region is still intact but departing the Equatorial Air at a slightly higher latitude. There is a heat storm forming over the Middle East. Africa has it's hot spots. There heat conduit is the primarily 'Heat Transfer System' on this satellite noting however a peculiar air mass orginating over the Congo Basin. That is new. That is interesting. The Congo Basin is a lush biotic area of a lot of flora. It is expected to have heat and high carbon dioxide concentrations over vegetative areas because the plants are respirating the CO2. THAT, new air mass is interesting. It actually appears to dip below the limit of the equator in it's origins. It is definately traveling sharply north to the Arctic Circle and the Arctic Ocean.  

European African Satellite January 20, 2005. These postings do not reflect a 'perfect' scientific study. If it were the satellites would be reflecting the same time on the same day. BUT. This pursuit of understanding is a darn good one anyway. The satellite in January over Afgrica was hotly tragic and the equatorial air mass was mostly indistinguishable. The heat conduit between South American and Afica was actually flowing from west to east on this satellite and up to the North Arctic Region. South Africa was HOT. This was still very much a Southern Hemisphere summer. So, what's up with the Northern Hemisphere? Larger land mass. Yes? Higher human populous. Higher levels of carbon dioxide emissions. A lot goes on with the Northern Hemisphere even though the Sol is still spending most of it's 'direct ray' radiation in the Southern Hemisphere. 

Western Hemisphere April 18, 2005 at 5:16 AM Eastern Daylight Time. The time of day is important because it is NOT in full 'sun' yet. HOWEVER. The equatorial region is very well defined with heat acculation there. There are heat transfer systems still noted but somewhat diminished in velocity. Sol is about half way through it's northern transit maximum. 

Western Hemisphere Global Satellite January 20, 2005. 

The Pacific Global Satellite today shows a continued movment of equatorial heat to the Antarctica continent. It also shows a stabilizing equatorial air mass circling Earth. Noted: There is marginal increase of Equatorial to Arctic Circle Heat Transfer Systems in the Northern Hemisphere with solar radiation migrating north. I would also consider the UV index a concern with Sunblock 35 or better not out of the question. 

Pacific Global Satellite January 11, 2005. 

The satellite today of the West Paciic Ocean shows a 'trailing off' of the heat here. That wasn't the case of January 2005. It is my opionion this is a change from the previous Global Warming cycle that has been vaporing Antarctica Ice. 

Western Pacific Ocean January 17, 2005. 

It's a tough call to know what is "UP" in the Southern Hemisphere. The Indian Ocean today is marvelously quite leading one to hope this is a permanent retreat by a heat stricken planet. But, there was another time, as noted below with a 'similar' picture before the huge heat storm of Febrary 4, 2005. 

The Indian Ocean January 11, 2005. Is it a cycle or is it truly cooling?