(click here for an AI reference)
He is trying to break down the alliance. I believe NATO can stand on it's own, but, at this point with Russia breathing down Europe's neck it is a horrible idea to challenge the alliance fiscally.
It is not just a bad idea, it is outrageous to demand such things by a Secretary of Defense. Hegseth can go straight to hell. This is a treaty issue belonging to Congress. Senator McConnell is holding the line on this mess and I appreciate his focus.
By the way Hegseth is focusing on the Caribbean again. He is fixated on the idea that the western hemisphere belongs to Trump.
THE DRAFT IS COMING AFTER THE MIDTERM ELECTIONS.
There are many ways of financing the alliance and over taxing the allies is the worst choice.
GDP has been a standard by applying a percentage to the treasury of the alliance, but, that is not the most effective way to look at the alliance financing. The USA carries the largest burden because it can. It is also the one country benefitting the most by the alliance.
Our military industrial complex is questionably on USA soil and it receives support from NATO. Not only that but we have the most people to protect. The USA garners a great deal of protection by Europe being a stanch friend. Besides an ocean away from Russia there is also an entire continent standing in the way.
THAT MATTERS.
When I once stated the resilience of the people of Ukraine comes from the fact, "They know who they are." That is the case with NATO. They are the front lines and they know it. That understanding has lived with the people of Europe for generations. They are proud of their heritage and rightfully so. They stood the ground when WWII became evident and gratefully they did. It wasn't until bombs landed on USA soil that Roosevelt finally took the assault against Europe seriously. If they had fallen to Hilter's Third Reich where would the USA have been when Peril Harbor fell?
As to Hegseth's being the War Secretary? He isn't attacking Russia or China, our real enemies, is he? No. He is picking on Iran, weakened and hated by Israel. He isn't interested in real war, he is interested in being "The Bully of War," not the "Secretary of War." Not to make a joke of the conflict in the Middle East as there are real deaths, including a civilian ship by Gambia.
How many Americans know where Gambia is?
How many Americans know what Gambia is all about?
None!
Gambia is absolutely NO THREAT to the USA, yet because it was docking in Iran for whatever reason it was, now the blasted ship is listing in the water with unknown causalities because Hegseth said so.
Maritime law does not lean into Hegseth's authority. Maritime law recognizes the vulnerability of "being at sea." Did Hegseth first offer assistance to the ship and seek what the issues might be? No. He simply ordered the USA military to disable or worse any ship headed to Iran. Hegseth is in violation of maritime law. This is not a war. As a matter of fact the USA has no authority to block commerce to Iran. Iran has no nuclear capabilities and it is NOT A THREAT TO THIS COUNTRY.
The Middle East is on fire because of Israeli expansionism, no other reason. If Israel got rid of it's nukes the world would be a better place.
But, as to the contribution by every country of NATO to it's treasury it can be looked at through "greatest benefit." The USA ranks at the top of greatest benefit both for the economic uptick it receives from the alliance and the number of people protected by the alliance. It is only best if the USA maintains that alliance in the face of the other countries facing a heavy burden to participate. They contribute to the number of soldiers and readiness which is more important than greatest benefit.
The monetary contribution is not as important as the strategy we share with really magnificent populations of people on a continent that is beautiful and resourceful.



