Most Democrats in Pennsylvania disapprove of his voting record.
His highest approval rating is with Republicans.
Pennsylvania Democrats should have a real person to vote for.
This Blog is created to stress the importance of Peace as an environmental directive. “I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it’s hell.” – Harry Truman (I receive no compensation from any entry on this blog.)
Most Democrats in Pennsylvania disapprove of his voting record.
His highest approval rating is with Republicans.
Pennsylvania Democrats should have a real person to vote for.
The aftermath (click here) of the Russian drone attack in Odesa Oblast on May 13 (Photo: State Emergency Service of Ukraine in Odesa Oblast/Handout via REUTERS)
Michigan Medicine isn’t able to settle a contract with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan. That’s okay. The Blues cancelled the policy contract as of December 31, 3025 of which I subscribed. I did the math. My costs under this new contract, if I had the exact same costs as last year will cost me $7855.00 more in co-pays.
I have had The Blues all my life.
My family has had The Blues all their lives.
That increase is highway robbery in the face of lousy tactics with Michigan Medicine negotiations. The Blues were sending out opinion polls to their subscribers to find pickable points during negotiations.
Not only that, but for three years running The Blues have tried to send nurse practitioners to subscribers homes to gather information that was only in Private Doctor files. Then the nurse practitioners were to be Case Managers and advise subscribers in regard to medications, etc.
The practices are highly unethical.
I will be looking for new healthcare insurance on June 1st because of failed contract negotiations. My doctors come first!
The profits these companies are making are obscene. There needs to be stronger regulatory laws. When a major health care insurer can’t enter into a contract with the state’s premier university hospital because it isn’t profitable there is something very, very wrong.
The whole Voting Rights Act of 1964? I am certain there are lots of pundits trying to justify racism. That really isn’t the argument to prove the racism though.
There once were carriages that horses pulled before there were horseless carriages.
(Click here)
The laws regulating horse drawn carriages are still on the books, right? There are only a few instances where they still apply. The Amish use their horse drawn carriages. Now a days they use signal lights so they are easier to see. In cities like New York the rules and regs would still apply because of the tourist businesses that still apply. So, while the laws are mostly obsolete, there are still instances where they are important.
The United States of America is a highly dynamic country. The freedoms of the First Amendment alone bring about a lot of tolerance to difference. The Freedom of Speech alone is vital to the democracy we all love and pledge allegiance.
None of those foundation documents are obsolete except to people who see authoritarianism as a real answer to taxes and the ever increasing diversity of the people of the USA.
The Voting Rights Act of 1964 is being actively dismantled. That is a hostile act.
When laws go into effect there is a good chance as time goes by they become obsolete. Laws becoming obsolete don’t have to be dismantled and in most instances are simply a part of history. It is a really fun and is funny to look at laws as they were 100 years ago and realize how far we have come, including child labor laws and the laws that set up the public education system. Where would we be as a sovereign country without public education?
The Voting Rights Act of 1964 was necessary at the time it passed into law. The Roberts Court would like Americans to believe it is obsolete and therefore has to be examined for updated high court remedies. That is corruption. High handed corruption.
If the Voting Rights of 1964 were obsolete there would be no need to litigate anything because it would mean the law worked and equality and respect for voting was achieved. If the law became obsolete it simply would not be used anymore. So, in Shelby vs. Holder they wanted the law watered down so they could conduct elections as they wanted. That’s the truth.
Shelby didn’t thank the founders of the Voting Rights Act of 1964 for seeing where correction needed to be made and bringing about equality. No. There was no thank you. My guess is there is too much hate to even recognize why the law was necessary in the first place.
If a Supreme Court decides in majority a law is obsolete and rightfully should be dismantled, what is next? The Constitution itself?
(Click here)
It is strange to live with the threat of reckless nuclear annihilation in a country with that capacity and as well as being a target. I always thought “The Twilight Zone” did a great serve to Americans about the folly of such weapons.
Given Hegseth's record of self-destruction in battle, it is a rather appropriate lesson even today.
I definitely would not rearm Hegseth. Seriously.
...A refusal by Saudi Arabia to allow the US to use its bases and airspace to provide a military escort for oil tankers passing through the strait of Hormuz lay behind Donald Trump’s decision to shelve the plan days after it had been launched.
Riyadh told the White House it would not allow its Prince Sultan airbase to be used to mount the operation billed as Project Freedom, which the US presented as the successor to the bombing campaign called Operation Epic Fury.
Saudi Arabia refused to drop its objections despite a personal call between the crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, and Trump, NBC reported....