Guest Expert states the bombers were not well trained killers. No evidence of any terrorism. States murders are the proper focus and just as consequential. States FBI had no reason to take their investigation further than they did of the eldest of the two brothers.
US Representative Peter King critical of other Republicans for seeking to cut funding to Homeland Security.
US Senator Diane Feinstein states no resident in Watertown or any surrounding community needed assault weapons to protect themselves. States, quite correctly, there are no more automatic weapons in the USA. I am adding this: The automatic weapons, the Tommy Guns, were made illegal in the USA. Senator Feinstein states there are no more automatic weapons in the USA. Wayne LaPierre, the CEO of the NRA states the bad guys will get the guns anyway. I state: They have never gotten automatic weapons in the USA after they were made illegal and today there are none on the streets of the USA. Therefore, Wayne LaPierre is using his culture of fear for profits because applications of past laws to remove dangerous weapons from the USA have worked and worked well.
An investigator from Boston states they are not investing any international connection to the Boston bombing. He has no knowledge of any such connection. I state: The FBI already investigated all that and found nothing. I want to know where the bomb making materials came from and how to stop it. I want to know where the guns came from and why with ease did they get them.
When the investigator stated they were not investigating any international connection, Chris Wallace blew right past it and continued to instill the fear of international terrorism.
Bill Krystal stated he believed in immigration reform, but, after this incident that has all changed now. I state: Let's follow the logic to that. Bill Crystal wants to play politics with the immigration issue to deny President Obama a legacy achievement. If Bill Crystal wasn't such a biased bigot he would realize how stupid his statement was. If indeed he is as concerned about international terrorism as he stated, then why would he want to continue the same immigration laws that allowed them in? He should be demanding reform, not denying it is necessary.
US Representative Peter King critical of other Republicans for seeking to cut funding to Homeland Security.
US Senator Diane Feinstein states no resident in Watertown or any surrounding community needed assault weapons to protect themselves. States, quite correctly, there are no more automatic weapons in the USA. I am adding this: The automatic weapons, the Tommy Guns, were made illegal in the USA. Senator Feinstein states there are no more automatic weapons in the USA. Wayne LaPierre, the CEO of the NRA states the bad guys will get the guns anyway. I state: They have never gotten automatic weapons in the USA after they were made illegal and today there are none on the streets of the USA. Therefore, Wayne LaPierre is using his culture of fear for profits because applications of past laws to remove dangerous weapons from the USA have worked and worked well.
An investigator from Boston states they are not investing any international connection to the Boston bombing. He has no knowledge of any such connection. I state: The FBI already investigated all that and found nothing. I want to know where the bomb making materials came from and how to stop it. I want to know where the guns came from and why with ease did they get them.
When the investigator stated they were not investigating any international connection, Chris Wallace blew right past it and continued to instill the fear of international terrorism.
Bill Krystal stated he believed in immigration reform, but, after this incident that has all changed now. I state: Let's follow the logic to that. Bill Crystal wants to play politics with the immigration issue to deny President Obama a legacy achievement. If Bill Crystal wasn't such a biased bigot he would realize how stupid his statement was. If indeed he is as concerned about international terrorism as he stated, then why would he want to continue the same immigration laws that allowed them in? He should be demanding reform, not denying it is necessary.
