What is a petition? It is a legal document voters signed to bring a ballot initiative to an election. It is frequently how RESIDENTS bring a topic of concern forward.
A petition has to be brought to ann election by a resident of the state where the ballot initiative will be decided by the people. Musk is a Texas resident. That is just to begin this entry.
A petition requires a certain number of registered voters to sign it initially to decide its worthiness as to whether it will be passed into law. A petition has to have a good chance of passing in to law to be on a ballot.
If I were a Wisconsin registered voter and there was a rally with my signature being a ticket to win $1 million U.S, I would do it. I would sign that petition as a hopeful path to $1 million U.S., regardless of how I expect to vote on Election Day. Darn right I would sign that petition. See where this is going?
Musk by advertising he will give away $1 million U.S. at a rally where registered voters who signed his petition has a ticket in the drawing. That is putting his thumb on the scale and creating a more than good chance there will be enough signatures to make the ballot for voter decisions.
No matter how that is examined it is election corruption. This is a pattern with Musk. But, why in Wisconsin? The General election of 2024 was obvious especially now that we know all the racketeering taking place behind the scenes with DoGE to indulge Musk’s businesses.
The contracts and monies Musk is receiving from Trump’s often illegal use of DoGE is far more than the millions he spent to get Trump into office.
No matter how it is viewed, it is racketeering. The only reason it continues is because Bondi looks the other way and Trump is chronically holding the Pardon Pen at the ready.
So, back to Wisconsin and the ballot now worth $1 million U.S. to at least two signers.
Using a $1 million US legal petition that is supposed to outlaw “activist” judges is buying votes. To begin we don’t know how many people would have actually signed it if there were no lottery attached to it. The petition is already corrupt.
The word activist is code for Democrat. Therefore, the petition is a passive advertisement for Wisconsin voters that basically says “Don’t vote a Democrat into the Supreme Court.” It is what it is. It is obvious.
The idea Judge Crawford could be anything but a good and fair judge is ridiculous. She has a very good record of making honest decisions based in the Rule of Law. The other candidate is interesting but has never served as a judge. The choice is obvious.
So, with all that in mind Musk’s involvement is prejudice to say the least and as corrupt an election strategy can be. Should the lawsuit go in Musk’s favor? How could it possibly?
Elections should be open and fair. It seems as though Musk’s greed in corrupting government is his favorite pastime.
I wish Judge Crawford the best. She is the most qualified with a proven record of taking good care of the citizens of Wisconsin.
