I can’t say I watch much television. I get my information these days primarily from newspapers. I do watch multimedia news and broadcasts of news programs, but, the primary source are several newspapers which serve as both left and right political domains.
These last three days I spent with a friend about 5 hours from home. The television plays frequently in my friend’s home. She is a widow. So, I was treated to television and advertisements. Low and behold there was Pfizer with an interesting set of commercials about their vaccines.
Pfizer has every right to tout its name and reputation across IT and any screen it can reach. This particular screen had to be a seven footer ad the images are incredibly good and intense. It is my opinion Pfizer’s reputation was well earned right up to this last COVID/Omicron bivalent shot. Here is why.
I have my own study group. All of the members received the latest Pfizer COVID/Omicron booster. Most have received the vaccinations from the beginning of the pandemic. All are senior citizens at varying ages and at least 65 years old.
Now I stated all have received the COVID/Omicron vaccine, so let me start there.
The information I have is all from the public domain. I am not a corporate spy and do not want to be. Other than being involved in gathering information about the gangland style corruption of “Untied Nations” I have never ventured into covert operations anywhere. I have at least one more entry to make about the Untied Nations thing, but, I am very busy and without a secretary.
So back to the Pfizer issue at hand. It is a serious infraction in any and all medical standards. The ads look to be General with one specific about the RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus). I found it interesting the company was promoting RSV specifically because it made more sense to have a cough as a side effect from that one. RSV will be discussed separately except to say it is also a live attenuated virus, too. Yes, too. Because Pfizer made the COVID bivalent wrong either in error or intentionally.
The public’s information about the COVID bivalent clearly lists no cough as a side effect. That may change now. I also looked at the testing statistics. I was not impressed. Let me state right here and now that the testing and the testing results could easily have been with an mRNA vaccine, it is just not what resulted in mass manufacturing.
The test results of testing negative for COVID before being a test subject resulted in just shy of 50 percent of the test participants testing positive after a period of time after vaccination. Yes, that is correct. All test subjects in the Pfizer reporting tested negative for COVID before vaccination and after a period of time after vaccination nearly 50 percent tested positive for COVID. That is a ridiculously high positive to be accepted by the FDA and only because Pfizer was still operating under emergency standards AND it is felt even acquired immunity from a vaccination will (this language is important) keep the citizens from going to the emergency room or become a hospital admission.
I believe all emergency vaccination standards must be ended by the CDC and FDA.
So, we have poor statistics out of the Pfizer trials and there is no cough listed as a side effect. Nor stats about contracting the virus, hence, cough was never listed as a side effect.
My study group all received the Pfizer COVID/Omicron bivalent about the same time and all developed a cough. A productive cough in producing a significant amount of mucus with every cough. The cough is intermittent and unpredictable so the acquired COVID infection really did keep my control group at home because self-care was a burden. They were unsure if they were contagious. Oh, there is more.
There were members of the group who also received the Pfizer RSV vaccine. None were aware it was a live attenuated virus and had they known would have reconsidered taking the vaccine. They had the cough from the COVID vaccine but initially the sputum was tinged green and after a week cleared to the same frothy white as the others.
All that said, it is my strong estimation the Pfizer COVID/Omicron bivalent vaccine was not an mRNA vaccine but a live attenuated virus that delivered the ability to be infected when none of my study group ever before contracted the virus.
Now, there is one other thing. The pharmacist I interviewed about the quality of the vaccine said this, “There is only one type of Pfizer COVID vaccine available to order for my customers to receive their shots in the store and that is the latest COVID/Omicron bivalent.” In other words, all my study group received the exact same vaccination. There were no others available from Pfizer. All members had the same exact sounding BARK from this vaccine.
There is no doubt from my perspective that the vaccines available to the public were mishandled and resulted in a live attenuated vaccine that caused the individuals to be infected with the COVID/Omicron virus resulting in a productive cough, wheezes, and lung infection never reported in any public information as side effects.
According to a physician I spoke with, it is required when outcomes of familiar boosters are to be released to the public that the education of any change from the past boosters are reported so the individual can decide about their vaccination. People are different and have the right to be safe on their own terms, ie: the annual flu vaccine is always featured in the news before the season of vaccination begins. NONE of this occurred with the latest Pfizer COVID/Omicron vaccine and now we have feel good advertisements on television compliments of Pfizer.
There is going to have to be a class action lawsuit filed to find victims to this vaccine. The elders are not necessarily reporting this to their doctors. They are, in my experience, are subclinical to the ER and hospital. They do experience some shortness of breath but none that causes them alarm.
I believe Pfizer was in a hurry to protect their market share and profits, didn’t bother to change the manufacturing method when producing the two vaccines, the bivalent and RSV and immediately after manufacture pushed both onto the market without education of the public except for fear driving participation by the public.
There is gross negligence by Pfizer in their manufacturings that could possibly be intentional. There was absolutely no education to the media to carry to the public regarding any changes from past expectations. There was also two separate vaccines in testing versus that administered to the public and there was never a mention of a cough or acquired infection in the testing side effects.
There needs to be an investigation and a recall of the Pfizer vaccine, but, with under reporting of this reality it most likely won’t happen without some recruitment of victims into a class action lawsuit.
There can easily be new standards set by the CDC and FDA going forward about requirements by any vaccine producer to keep mandatory OUTCOME to their vaccines so we know citizens aren’t receiving water injections. Those changes in standards, especially in adverse herd statistics reporting once a vaccine is released, should already be in place. A reporting card given with the vaccine to a common third party would be very simple to accommodate such herd statics. The public would want to participate eagerly and would be reassured in being able to see any reporting on a public website. All this must become part of any vaccination regime regardless the vaccine including parent reporting of their children’s vaccines.
Good night for now.
