93 S.Ct. 705
35 L.Ed.2d 147
Jane ROE, et al., Appellants,
v.
Henry WADE.
No. 70-18.
Argued Dec. 13, 1971.
Reargued Oct. 11, 1972.
Decided Jan. 22, 1973.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1973.
A pregnancy is a pregnancy is a pregnancy and sometimes they are unwanted. A fetus cannot sustain it's self outside the uterus and the uterus belongs to a woman. A woman is impacted by socio-economic dynamics that demand her to make decisions about her future and whether or not she is ready to be a mother and support herself and a child.
It is time to end the hubris Federalist Society judges bring to their practice and end the victims always living in anxiety because of their gender and pregnancy and/or their gender and who they love.
Enough of this already, it is time for the Federalist Society to grow up.
Coney-Barrett's approach to the USA Constitution is completely wrong and out in left field somewhere. Or is it right field? Whatever field she is in she is welcome to stay in it, but, just leave the people of the USA alone. She is not Supreme Court material, because of her prejudice which is considerable. I don't know of any judge in history that actively and openly sought to end the USA Constitution as we know it.
