The scientists are part of the fraud if they are not moving professionally as a group to end the fraud. They are part of the problem if they aren't taking the matter into their own lives. Where are their lawyers filing papers in court to fight for the public.
Why aren't the scientists stating, "I cannot professionally be a part of this." A paycheck? That is preventing them from saving the lives of Americans? That is what Trump and his administration is counting on.
Warning the public about the fraud in HHS and it's migration into the CDC isn't enough. Law enforcement needs to be harnessed to remove those committing fraud all the way up the chain of command. The scientists must ask the prosecutors to move against the Trump Administration because he is endangering the public and people will die.
By Apoorva Mandavilli
Alex Azar, United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, speaks at a press conference about the Coronavirus on Feb. 26, 2020.
A heavily criticized (click here) recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last month about who should be tested for the coronavirus was not written by C.D.C. scientists and was posted to the agency’s website despite their serious objections, according to several people familiar with the matter as well as internal documents obtained by The New York Times.
The guidance said it was not necessary to test people without symptoms of Covid-19 even if they had been exposed to the virus. It came at a time when public health experts were pushing for more testing rather than less, and administration officials told The Times that the document was a C.D.C. product and had been revised with input from the agency’s director, Dr. Robert Redfield.
But officials told The Times this week that the Department of Health and Human Services did the rewriting and then “dropped” it into the C.D.C.’s public website, flouting the agency’s strict scientific review process....
A heavily criticized (click here) recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last month about who should be tested for the coronavirus was not written by C.D.C. scientists and was posted to the agency’s website despite their serious objections, according to several people familiar with the matter as well as internal documents obtained by The New York Times.
The guidance said it was not necessary to test people without symptoms of Covid-19 even if they had been exposed to the virus. It came at a time when public health experts were pushing for more testing rather than less, and administration officials told The Times that the document was a C.D.C. product and had been revised with input from the agency’s director, Dr. Robert Redfield.
But officials told The Times this week that the Department of Health and Human Services did the rewriting and then “dropped” it into the C.D.C.’s public website, flouting the agency’s strict scientific review process....
