It is agreed the emails were hacked (stolen) from DNC records, cyber records. Were they altered? See, the truth is a really difficult thing to live with. Most Americans value the truth. It is ingrained through our justice system. So, the emails came to the public through an illegal act. But, that doesn't mean the emails are false.
Understand this, I would not have speculated about anyone's spoken faith. I can't conceive of it. The leader of a very powerful political party not only conceived of questioning Bernie Sander's faith, but, stated it in an email in case it had to be deployed for Hillary Clinton's victory. Who is really trying effect the outcomes of elections?
July 24, 2016
Understand this, I would not have speculated about anyone's spoken faith. I can't conceive of it. The leader of a very powerful political party not only conceived of questioning Bernie Sander's faith, but, stated it in an email in case it had to be deployed for Hillary Clinton's victory. Who is really trying effect the outcomes of elections?
July 24, 2016
By David E. Sanger and Nicole Perloth
...Proving the source of a cyberattack is notoriously difficult. (click here) But researchers have concluded that the national committee was breached by two Russian intelligence agencies, which were the same attackers behind previous Russian cyberoperations at the White House, the State Department and the Joint Chiefs of Staff last year. And metadata from the released emails suggests that the documents passed through Russian computers. Though a hacker claimed responsibility for giving the emails to WikiLeaks, the same agencies are the prime suspects. Whether the thefts were ordered by Mr. Putin, or just carried out by apparatchiks who thought they might please him, is anyone’s guess.
On Sunday morning, the issue erupted, as Mrs. Clinton’s campaign manager, Robby Mook, argued on ABC’s “This Week” that the emails were leaked “by the Russians for the purpose of helping Donald Trump” citing “experts” but offering no other evidence. Mr. Mook also suggested that the Russians might have good reason to support Mr. Trump: The Republican nominee indicated in an interview with The New York Times last week thathe might not back NATO nations if they came under attack from Russia — unless he was first convinced that the countries had made sufficient contributions to the Atlantic alliance....
I find it interesting people are actually afraid of the truth. I suggest those that know an alternative reality from the truth in this election come to terms with it now.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz's inappropriate standards for the DNC has existed for a while now. I don't care if she elected President Obama, I VOTED FOR HIM. I voted for him REGARDLESS of the lousy standards of Schultz. She needs to leave. She didn't elect him, the American people did. That is an ego the DNC does not need at any level. Amazing, a white woman with lousy standards for elections actually believes she elected Barak Obama to the presidency.
GOOD BYE, DEBBIE!!!!!!!!!!!
NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I find it interesting people are actually afraid of the truth. I suggest those that know an alternative reality from the truth in this election come to terms with it now.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz's inappropriate standards for the DNC has existed for a while now. I don't care if she elected President Obama, I VOTED FOR HIM. I voted for him REGARDLESS of the lousy standards of Schultz. She needs to leave. She didn't elect him, the American people did. That is an ego the DNC does not need at any level. Amazing, a white woman with lousy standards for elections actually believes she elected Barak Obama to the presidency.
GOOD BYE, DEBBIE!!!!!!!!!!!
NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
