What next? The color of her bedroom drapes? After all I only vote for people with red curtains.
February 25, 2016
By the Editorial Board
...Voters have every right to know (click here) what Mrs. Clinton told these groups. In July, her spokesman Nick Merrill said that though most speeches were private, the Clinton operation “always opened speeches when asked to.” Transcripts of speeches that have been leaked have been pretty innocuous. By refusing to release them all, especially the bank speeches, Mrs. Clinton fuels speculation about why she’s stonewalling....
She has a legal obligation to those that hired her. Hillary Clinton is allowed to have a private server and she is allowed to make speeches she was hired to do so.
It is unfortunate The New York Times wants to be the ultimate power player, who is paying the New York Times to do so?
It won't stop with the speeches. Those trying to defeat her bid for President will be then interviewing the Board members of the organizations and scrutinizing their purpose in having Hillary Clinton speak and the hopes and dreams of corruption yet realized.
Enough.
Run on the issues and do good work for the American people. If a candidate needs to become a muckraker then the candidates aren't running on issues that will draw the electorate. I don't want voters staying home because the game is more fun than the responsibility to vote.
Let's make it a real circus:
February 25, 2016
By the Editorial Board
...Voters have every right to know (click here) what Mrs. Clinton told these groups. In July, her spokesman Nick Merrill said that though most speeches were private, the Clinton operation “always opened speeches when asked to.” Transcripts of speeches that have been leaked have been pretty innocuous. By refusing to release them all, especially the bank speeches, Mrs. Clinton fuels speculation about why she’s stonewalling....
She has a legal obligation to those that hired her. Hillary Clinton is allowed to have a private server and she is allowed to make speeches she was hired to do so.
It is unfortunate The New York Times wants to be the ultimate power player, who is paying the New York Times to do so?
It won't stop with the speeches. Those trying to defeat her bid for President will be then interviewing the Board members of the organizations and scrutinizing their purpose in having Hillary Clinton speak and the hopes and dreams of corruption yet realized.
Enough.
Run on the issues and do good work for the American people. If a candidate needs to become a muckraker then the candidates aren't running on issues that will draw the electorate. I don't want voters staying home because the game is more fun than the responsibility to vote.
Let's make it a real circus:
