Senator Dan Coates is imagineering the problems with the Iran agreement.
"What if this agreement was conducted during the George W. Bush administration. The agreement would have expired already."
Then:
He states Henry Kissinger, age 97 years, expressed concern for non-state actors.
Non-state actors? Like Osama bin Laden living within the military university complex in Pakistan? Those non-state actors.
Hm. If al Qaeda hadn't obtained control of nuclear capacity already, there is no chance that is going to happen. Al Qaeda would have to control nuclear missile sites as well as centrifuges, etc. to be a threat. Dan Coates actually sees that happening in the Iran agreement? That is a joke and an insult to the American people.
If there were ever any non-state actors with nuclear capacity it would be detected. Which brings the issue to ambassadors and embassies in all countries by the USA. There should be productive relationships with countries around the world to enhance a far better outcome to economic security as well as a country's national security.
I remind, there was absolutely no movement by George Walker Bush to capture bin Laden. None. He was looking in the mountains for a decade without finding him. But, never once sought to expand his understanding of where bin Laden was living to end the al Qaeda leader. Bin Laden was within reach of a military institution in Pakistan and never once did George Walker Bush find him a threat enough to end his prowess of terrorist attacks. Now, the American people are suppose to believe Iran is going to be a threat because of non-state actors. Given the history of the Republican presidents they might have a point. It actually does depend on the President in the Oval Office to secure the USA.
Senator Pat Roberts is stating the USA should have a treaty. So where is it? There is absolutely nothing stopping Pat Roberts from negotiating a treaty with Iran. Not a thing.
The only treaties the Republicans know how to write are treaties like TPP or the TIPP.
In his book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, (click here) John Perkins pulls back the curtain to reveal how exactly the globalization machinery works. The signing of the TTIP and TPP treaties create the framework for a one world government....
I could get into a lot of speculation about this mess, but, the facts cannot be disputed. For decades American family farmers were scared to death of the "Trilateral Commission" (click here) because of it's POTENTIAL to develop a one world government. Those that see the idea conspiracy theories as childishness always called such accusations as silliness and lack of sophistication.
Today the Republican majority has given the President permission to give away the American economy to other countries. So much for conspiracy theorists and their silliness.
Membership in the Trilateral Commission is by invitation only. (click here)
It is not an international organization based in democracy. Every President of the USA have been members.
The point is today in 2015 we are looking at treaties drawn up that is to benefit Wall Street by dismantling the American economy from local control and independent of foreign trade of that is what the people want. There are provisions in the TPP that requires commodities from the partnership be sold in the USA regardless of what the people want. The TPP removes democracy to benefit Wall Street. That is simply a fact. So, was the agricultural community correct to the outcome of decades of stating conspiracy theory? It sure as heck looks like it.
When it comes to treaties the Republicans only see THEIR world through Rose Colored Wall Street glasses that line the pockets of cronies, including the banks of 2008. As far as treaties that actually work to make the world safer? Why? Why do that, when the USA military has a huge shadow over the entire world? The Republicans don't have to understand international treaties for peace and the end of a nuclear threat to the world. As a matter of fact they embrace the idea of 'break out' nuclear capacity of other countries, it provides for their fear mongering. For decades we have heard the Republicans war monger to only see the USA military larger than than all first world nations and China and Russia combined. Along with that military size is just as interesting a budget and wasteful spending such as the F35.
The F35 has had more than a trillion dollars spent on it with no end in sight. The bird doesn't fly without problems.
The Republicans only speak to fear and the 'idea' all people can find wealth in just being an American. Neither are realistic.
It would be really helpful if the USA had an embassy again in Iran. It would provide the USA a way of receiving increased international trade with Iran. It would return function and less fear to the international theater.
The reason there was a failure of the American mission in Iran is because people like Henry Kissinger backed the lies and deceptions of nuclear power by the USA to Iran. The American mission in Iran failed because the USA backed a leader that never provided for the well being of Iran's people. It is up to the USA to begin to find it's way back to being an economic partner with Iran. Will it ever happen again? We have to try.
It is too easy to be the world's largest and most dangerous military. It is a reputation we cannot afford and it only provides barriers to peace.
This agreement within the authority of the P5+1 is a beginning, not an end. It would be wrong to refuse the opportunity to define a relationship with Iran. We have to walk back the "Axis of Evil" speech. We have to earn trust again with Iran. Iran finds itself at the center of protections to the Shia. We need to do better in our relationships other than run game into countries like Iraq. The USA was wrong. We need to recapture the dignity taken from us.
"What if this agreement was conducted during the George W. Bush administration. The agreement would have expired already."
Then:
He states Henry Kissinger, age 97 years, expressed concern for non-state actors.
Non-state actors? Like Osama bin Laden living within the military university complex in Pakistan? Those non-state actors.
Hm. If al Qaeda hadn't obtained control of nuclear capacity already, there is no chance that is going to happen. Al Qaeda would have to control nuclear missile sites as well as centrifuges, etc. to be a threat. Dan Coates actually sees that happening in the Iran agreement? That is a joke and an insult to the American people.
If there were ever any non-state actors with nuclear capacity it would be detected. Which brings the issue to ambassadors and embassies in all countries by the USA. There should be productive relationships with countries around the world to enhance a far better outcome to economic security as well as a country's national security.
I remind, there was absolutely no movement by George Walker Bush to capture bin Laden. None. He was looking in the mountains for a decade without finding him. But, never once sought to expand his understanding of where bin Laden was living to end the al Qaeda leader. Bin Laden was within reach of a military institution in Pakistan and never once did George Walker Bush find him a threat enough to end his prowess of terrorist attacks. Now, the American people are suppose to believe Iran is going to be a threat because of non-state actors. Given the history of the Republican presidents they might have a point. It actually does depend on the President in the Oval Office to secure the USA.
Senator Pat Roberts is stating the USA should have a treaty. So where is it? There is absolutely nothing stopping Pat Roberts from negotiating a treaty with Iran. Not a thing.
The only treaties the Republicans know how to write are treaties like TPP or the TIPP.
In his book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, (click here) John Perkins pulls back the curtain to reveal how exactly the globalization machinery works. The signing of the TTIP and TPP treaties create the framework for a one world government....
I could get into a lot of speculation about this mess, but, the facts cannot be disputed. For decades American family farmers were scared to death of the "Trilateral Commission" (click here) because of it's POTENTIAL to develop a one world government. Those that see the idea conspiracy theories as childishness always called such accusations as silliness and lack of sophistication.
Today the Republican majority has given the President permission to give away the American economy to other countries. So much for conspiracy theorists and their silliness.
Membership in the Trilateral Commission is by invitation only. (click here)
It is not an international organization based in democracy. Every President of the USA have been members.
The point is today in 2015 we are looking at treaties drawn up that is to benefit Wall Street by dismantling the American economy from local control and independent of foreign trade of that is what the people want. There are provisions in the TPP that requires commodities from the partnership be sold in the USA regardless of what the people want. The TPP removes democracy to benefit Wall Street. That is simply a fact. So, was the agricultural community correct to the outcome of decades of stating conspiracy theory? It sure as heck looks like it.
When it comes to treaties the Republicans only see THEIR world through Rose Colored Wall Street glasses that line the pockets of cronies, including the banks of 2008. As far as treaties that actually work to make the world safer? Why? Why do that, when the USA military has a huge shadow over the entire world? The Republicans don't have to understand international treaties for peace and the end of a nuclear threat to the world. As a matter of fact they embrace the idea of 'break out' nuclear capacity of other countries, it provides for their fear mongering. For decades we have heard the Republicans war monger to only see the USA military larger than than all first world nations and China and Russia combined. Along with that military size is just as interesting a budget and wasteful spending such as the F35.
The F35 has had more than a trillion dollars spent on it with no end in sight. The bird doesn't fly without problems.
The Republicans only speak to fear and the 'idea' all people can find wealth in just being an American. Neither are realistic.
The reason there was a failure of the American mission in Iran is because people like Henry Kissinger backed the lies and deceptions of nuclear power by the USA to Iran. The American mission in Iran failed because the USA backed a leader that never provided for the well being of Iran's people. It is up to the USA to begin to find it's way back to being an economic partner with Iran. Will it ever happen again? We have to try.
It is too easy to be the world's largest and most dangerous military. It is a reputation we cannot afford and it only provides barriers to peace.
This agreement within the authority of the P5+1 is a beginning, not an end. It would be wrong to refuse the opportunity to define a relationship with Iran. We have to walk back the "Axis of Evil" speech. We have to earn trust again with Iran. Iran finds itself at the center of protections to the Shia. We need to do better in our relationships other than run game into countries like Iraq. The USA was wrong. We need to recapture the dignity taken from us.
